You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Isn’t That Counter-Productive?

I’m a bit perplexed about something. Back in the good ole’ days, when Americans weren’t buying McMansions and didn’t feel the sense of entitlement that they do today, people would put 20% down to purchase a home or a condo. The rest would be financed.

As the economy soared in the 1990’s and 2000’s, that threshold was reduced to 10% and 5%. As real estate prices skyrocketed to absurd levels, mortgages were offered with no money down. Now, I’m the first to admit that I find that insane. And, quite frankly, I feel no sympathy towards the people who purchased homes well beyond their means when they couldn’t even prove themselves capable of saving enough money to put down even a modest down payment. I mean, come on, the fact that you had no money saved to even purchase a residence in the first place should be the biggest warning sign to any lender that you’re not ready for ownership.

Anyway, although I find “no money down” to be absurd, in areas of the country where real estate is rather high (northeast, west coast, etc…) I can understand requiring 10% down.

But now with banks no longer lending as freely as they once did, and the economy effectively in the shithole, banks are increasing the down payment requirement to 25% for condos. TWENTY-FIVE percent! That’s insane. Considering Boston area condos start in the $200K range and can go for as much as $500K for a decent 2 bedroom place (even in areas like Somerville, Medford, and Arlington), this means some people will need to have $50,000 to $125,000 (or more) in cash up front.

Add to that the fact that you should keep a reserve of 3-6 months worth of expenses in savings, and this is going to severely limit the ability of many (if not most) people to purchase a new residence. I thought the whole purpose of these stimulus packages was to increase bank lending and increase purchasing? If somebody has 10% ($50,000 in cash), plus 6 months in reserves, plus a solid job, plus a stellar credit rating….shouldn’t they be able to buy?

I don’t think there should be exceptions to the rule…that’s how this whole mess started. But is it too much to ask to just implement some realistic rules in the first place?

No Comments

No comments yet.

Comments RSS

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.