You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

SEMing the Inevitable

ø

After a restorative run and morning squash game with Mark, I spent the morning preparing a second set of SEM stubs of the diatoms I had sonicated and cleaned yesterday afternoon (the batch I’d made yesterday seemed a little too dense, having left behind a thick chalky white dot where the water dried up). I booked the next available SEM slot, which—miraculously—was at 1pm today, raced to get the stubs sputter coated, and checked them out.

The results are not far off what I expected to see—a lot of flimsy, warped diatoms—and also indicated that even the little sonicating I did yesterday (one blast of about 30 seconds or so, then three more short blasts of <5 seconds) was too much for these weakly silicified things, turning most of the material into rubble.

Here a selection of what I saw.

Each sample had a sharp edge where the water droplet was—with a lot of indiscriminate goop (organic matter?)/fine-grained debris over most of the surface, except at the edge, where some coarser material was visible:

There were some moderately intact valves amidst the debris:

Many of those looked like they were so flimsy they were essentially warping or folding; some had very large-pored/flimsy “skirts”:

The second set of samples I made were a little less crowded, but still far too dense:

Even the best-preserved specimens didn’t look like much:

For comparison, this is what the species I’m looking at here —Lithodesmium undulatum—is actually supposed to look like (courtesy of this website):

previous:
Disappointment Returns By Way of a Poke in the Eye With a Flimsy Diatom
next:
Back from Amsterdam

Comments are closed.