What’s In a Name?: Navigating the Internet with a Real Name
Comments: 6 - Date: January 29th, 2009 - Categories: Identity
My more sensible fellow interns post here under their real names, whereas my WordPress username is a funny, nonsensical “kurquoise.” (Look up, it says “Posted by kurquoise” in light green letters.) This pseudonym is a holdover from when we were first launching the blog, and out of convenience, it has just stuck around, but it alludes to an interesting point.
As the Internet has “grown up” over the past few years, one of the major trends has been a move away from anonymity toward the credibility of real names. That’s not to say anonymous and pseudonymous corners of the web are not still thriving, but simply that there’s a greater movement toward aggregating our various online avatars into one coherent identity. More concretely, what do I mean why this? Services like Friend Connect or Facebook Connect or FriendFeed or DISQUS — essentially services that pull information from across the Internet and feed it into one name. Of course, there’s no digital Big Brother forcing to use a real name, but if you’re going through all that trouble to aggregate everything – from blog entries to Flickr comments – aren’t you constructing digital identity so complete as to almost mirror your nondigital one? In the world of social media, your identity – your real name – has value. I mean this completely uncynically: your name is a brand.
Facebook was one of the first social networks to capitalize on the credibility of real names, and it succeeded precisely because of this. The barriers to online interaction were drastically lowered; you no longer needed to exchange an email or a phone number – just a name was enough. Facebook is a closed system though, and Facebook Connect is an attempt to extend it over the rest of the Internet. But people are already blogging, tweeting, and commenting under their real names – building a digital network that has real value. Using a real name undoubtedly adds credibility to that they do.
Nikki and Diana have both written fantastic posts here on the motivations, strategies, and sometimes of using your real name online. Unlike Nikki and Diana, I don’t own my own domain name (alas, there is a Sarah Zhang more famous and accomplished than me), and I use my real name sparingly online. I’ve often been on the verge of purchasing my own domain or simply keeping a blog under my own name, but there’s something that has been holding me back.
Part of my reluctance to define myself online is related to me grappling with my own shifting identities as a young adult. Forgive me for being existential here, but how do I tell others who I am when I’m not even completely sure of it myself? One of the first legitimate Google hits on my real name is a bio page for an internship I did the summer after my freshman year. The bio, which I wrote as a freshman (less than a year ago), is now completely outdated, listing an different major, activities, etc. In the same vein, my Xanga posts from middle school or Livejournal posts from high school and the other various “blogs” I kept throughout the years reflect a very different person from who I am today. My attitudes and interests change, and I don’t necessarily want my teenage self to exist as a digital representation of myself or future employers.
When are teenagers ready to manage their reputations? It’s a tricky question because my interactions with the Internet, even posting anonymously or pseudonymously, have shaped a large part of who I am. How do you feel about using your real name online? Would you have entrusted your teenage self with your real name?
-Sarah Zhang
Comment by Laura - January 29, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Oh my goodness! I was just thinking about this too. When I was younger (I’m 30 now) and email was just surfacing for the average Joe, I made up some ridiculous email address that referred to sunflowers in French. It took days to give it out to friends, having to spell it out and then add the underscores, etc. In my twenties, I went by sunschyne because sunshine was already taken and I thought I was cool spelling it so uniquely, but ugh! I had the same problem. Finally, I’ve learned my lesson and stuck with my name. It was a hassle having to send out all those emails explaining my change of internet identity, but it’s so much easier now to give out my email and I don’t even have to explain what it means or how I chose it!
Great observations in your post!
Comment by thinkingdifference - January 31, 2009 @ 1:20 pm
i’ve also checked quite often to see what comes out when i google my ‘IRL’ name and my online pseudonyms, and frankly, it’s a bit worrying. it’s not only the private info, but it’s also the static image of my thoughts and comments that worries me. i blog, but i do not go back on older posts to change them as my ideas change over time. i wonder how i’ll feel 10 yrs from now about my ideas today. i think this is why i dislike the idea of using just one single online name/ identity. you’re right, the name becomes your identity, but i’m still bothered by the static and one-dimension of this identity, in spite of the optimistic discourse on how the internet allows the multiple self to unravel itself.
Comment by Still anon - February 2, 2009 @ 4:08 pm
And don’t forget the fact that employers do google potential hires, so that permanent record of your younger self can haunt you in unexpected ways. The web world is a fantastic place to learn and experiment with technologies and ideas, but the everlasting nature of the medium is a huge reason to be careful with your own name.
For me, I have three or four different pseudonyms for various online activities that I hope can’t be linked to each other without some work. I do have a couple of places where I use my own name, but they are few and far between. And even with those pseudonyms I try to be careful about what I post, just in case.
It might sound paranoid, but for me it’s about privacy as much as it’s about reputation management – and it’s also about the freedom to play with a bit less worry than I would have if everything I did online was clearly connected to my real identity. I want to be sure that when I do put things out there with my IRL name it reflects the person I really am – not the person who was venting off after a bad day.
Comment by Jon aka Ephricon - February 4, 2009 @ 2:42 pm
Sarah,
Good thoughts here. While a made-up name can be more memorable in the short-term, it can also potentially be handicapping in the long-run. If you build a brand and some reputation behind a screenname than that will only stick with you as long as the screenname does. Assuming its not trademarked or somehow registered, it can also be easier for a competitor to imitate you on other sites. Someone could set up an account at flickr.com or whatever and pose as you. You’d have little recourse. But if they put an account at flickr.com than your case may be more clear.
That said, a screenname – especially a unique one – has many advantages too. My company name – Ephricon – means nothing. Its completely made up. The day I decided to use that name (roughly 7 years ago) I did a Google search and there were 0 results. Now I can search on that and basically everything I find will in some way relate to my firm.
…but there is the problem! I hate the name! I want to change it, but doing so would mean I’d have to start over – at least in some sense – with building a reputation in my industry that has taken a lot of hard work to develop. Thus, I choose to stick with a nonsense brand name that I don’t really like.
Comment by Jon aka Ephricon - February 4, 2009 @ 2:43 pm
oops, those URLs didn’t come through b/c of the spam filter… the first should be (flickr)/kurquoise and the second (flickr)/sarahzhang
Comment by venkat - February 7, 2009 @ 11:35 am
@Kurquoise it’s up to indivdual to decide they want to use their real name or other name on web.Whatever we said is recorded in internet,making comments ,positng posts in blog,tweets through twitter its relating to that perticluar person than nothing else.Here name is the one which everyone recognises .