For a person to desire to create a blog is only natural – and therefore regrettable. The love of novelty is a pleasant sort of cross, it’s evidence of a naive don’t-give-a-damn attitude, a passing, positive, sign without rhyme or reason. But this need is out of date, too. By giving “this art” (the blog) the impetus of supreme simplicity – novelty – we are being human and true in relation to innocent pleasures; impulsive and vibrant inorder to crucify boredom. From a very shallow pond I’m writing a pronunciamento and there’s nothing I want, and yet I’m saying certain things, and in principle I am against pronunciamentos, as I am against principles (quantifying measures of the moral value of every phrase – too easy; and the approximations that were recently reinvented by the postmodernists).
Blog – this is a word that throws up ideas so that they can be shot down; every bourgeois is a little playwright, who invents different subjects and who, instead of situating suitable characters on the level of his own intelligence, like chrysalises on chairs, tries to find causes or objects (according to whichever psychoanalytic method he practices) to give weight to his plot, a talking and self-defining story.
Every linker, spectator and lurker is a plotter, if he tries to explain a word (as if one really knows the meaning!) from his padded refuge of serpentine complications, he allows his instincts to be manipulated. Whence the sorrows of conjugal life.
Do the amusements of bloggers lie in the mills of empty skulls?
Del manifiesto postbloggerista, hallado via Gonzo Engaged, donde son capaces de explosiones verbales tan brillantes como