Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway), a recent Northwestern University journalism grad went to a job interview millions of other girls would kill for: working at the elite fashion magazine Runway. After a few minutes sitting in the waiting area, she was surprised by finding out all employees there worked for an emperor-typed editor, Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep). Andy got this job. But she soon found out it torture for her. Miranda was never pleased, though poor Andy had tightened every muscle of hers.
With the help from a colleague, Andy realized the ultimate reason was her detached passion. As an Ivy grad, she never took the fashion industry seriously. It’s only “stuff” in her mind while all others embrace it heart and soul, though maybe only for money. Andy decided to change, turning 180 degrees to become a fashion girl.
Miranda let her perform increasingly impossible errands. She asked for the unfinished new Harry Potter manuscript for her twins, but Andy handled it easily and pleased her for the first time. She went to her role, fashionable, work-oriented and Miranda-slaved. She broke up with her boy friend, after many years of mad-love. Her friends left her.
Finally, Miranda told her she became one of them in the industry and had a promising future. Andy suddenly realized something wrong. She recalled her dream of life and left Miranda decidedly.
This movie is a delicate defense of the inequality and hierarchy, which it seems to oppose and fight back.
One scenario in the movie that makes the point evident is that a writer, who is also a suitor of Andy, questioned her why she made a 180 degree turn to defend Miranda. Andy was shocked, recalling her attitude of looking down to the fashion industry in the very beginning. What happened?
Well, Andy had changed during the long period of trying to please Miranda. Though it is true that Miranda caused her painful experience of adapting this job, she also gave her satisfaction. After all, this is a job a million girls will kill for, standing on the frontier of the fashion industry, working with a woman that ruling the whole fashion world. Andy defeated her old self, the one labeled the fashion work as “stuff”.
It is truly just “stuff”. But Andy changed her idea towards that stuff and believed it might have some value. What is the good of a 1,900$ purse or 1,000$ perfume? It is just the waste of money by people to display a higher status than others, which Thorstein Veblen coined the term “conspicuous consumption” to describe. Conspicuous consumption has become a form of addiction arising from consumerism, creating hedonic expectations among the population.
One may be disciplined to accept the status quo, or even to defend it. This is a vivid lesson.