Archive for October, 2008

Vista discriminates poor

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

This is yet another post ranting on the negative aspects of having Vista as an operating system.

I went to the CEX store in Boston today, with high hopes of finding a good PC simulation game. Not being a programmer, I don’t know how hard it is to make a simulation game, but the number of titles seems to be plummeting every year. Well, yes, there are all those SIMS title and Spore (still counts as part of the SIMS family) but other than that, there really is nothing.

In fact, the situation is so bad I’ve actually been paying Oberon to download their simulation games. (No offense to Oberon) It’s a waste of money because you can finish it very quickly and the graphics are an eyesore. So far, I’ve played Westward Bound 2, one about developing settlements (this one was actually okay, except it had a lot of graphics bugs) and Youda Camper. I finished Youda Camper in two hours, I think. (You have to pay once you pass the free 1-hour period so I felt really cheated of my money) I long for StarCraft or Caesar.

But I digress. Back to the CEX store, where I planned to get some good old used simulation games. I had a $59 voucher with me so I was greedily looking over the shelves when it suddenly struck me that I can’t play any of the games that are on the PC game rack because none of them support Vista.

It’s just so sad when you think about it because in this financial crisis, game developers are not going to make simulation games because of the teeny market and poor gamers can’t play old games because their computers have Vista.

Waiting for an election bomb

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

As mentioned earlier in a post about my thoughts on citizen reporting (NOT journalism), NYT Noam Cohen writes about the recent Apple drop after unverified news regarding Steve Jobs’ health. Noting this trend way before Cohen, Prof. Harry Lewis fears that a similar thing will happen with the election at the last minute.

Although not related to journalism, a similar thing did happen with the 2002 presidential election in Korea. It was somewhat a close campaign between the conservative Lee Hoi-chang and more liberal Roh Moo-hyun. (One must note that in Korea, the concept of conservatism, liberalism, and so forth are quite different in dimension than that of the U.S. Given political history and surrounding countries, lefties are more closely associated with socialism in Korea than lefties in the U.S.)

Roh had already had quite a savvy Internet-centered campaign, very much like Obama (only in terms of Internet savviness- Roh didn’t have any higher education) whereas the Lee campaign was extremely ignorant of the Internet, no thanks to campaign organizers who ignored consultants and younger net-savvy campaign members. It was a close campaign, but many polls showed that Lee still had a slight edge. What gave Roh the final push, however, was in the last hours of election day.

Now on election day, unless one is terribly committed to a certain candidate, one sometimes is too lazy to go to the poll. Netizens, however, stirred up a frenzy towards the end of the day, claiming that Roh was extremely far behind and each vote was of crucial matter. These messages, posted on forums and passed through mobile text messages mainly among young people, urged many young voters to go to the polls at the last minute. The interesting thing was that the % of young people who actually voted at all was lower than that of previous elections, but those who voted were more Roh’s fans than Lee’s. Analysts said that these votes were crucial in Roh’s victory. He only won by 580,000 votes.

I felt in the case of Korea, the Internet fostered a terrible echo chamber that supported an underqualified candidate and strongly disagree with a Berkman report that suggests that the citizen journalism site OhMyNews played a role in promoting democracy in its coverage of the elections. (OhMyNews’ role and its effect on freedom of speech and its involvement in the election coverage was an entirely different matter. That is, unless democracy is seen as something on par with echo chambers)

Social Network vs. Sociable Network

Monday, October 13th, 2008

So-called social networks are encouraging digital narcissism. They aren’t doing their job. Or at least people in my networks aren’t socializing in social networks. I suppose it’s because the “social” in “social network” has multiple meanings. Although people are socializing on a certain level, I find that more and more people are just using the network as a platform to boost their ego and promote themselves. This kind of digital narcissism greatly affects the kind of content they post their sites, since they are hugely interested in how others perceive them. (I’ve already talked about this in a previous post about political twittering.)

I am not against these networks that are becoming more and more of a profile database, but I believe that social networks can be used for actual networking and human interaction; which was one of the founding missions of Ewhaian. Perhaps we need a new social network where we can be more comfortable being an individual in a group instead of being a group of individuals. Though I dread that I may sound like a commie, I want a sociable network, not a social one (I wonder if there is such a term?). That is something Facebook- and all the other American SN sites lack. In some sense, I want to go back to the atmosphere that was generated in forums and “communities” back in the old days when the Internet was harnessed through services like CompuServe. (Being in Korea, I used Hitel, Chollian, Nownuri, and Netsgo- all of which have since disappeared.)

For instance, I am part of the Harvard network and have subscribed to a number of “groups” but the activity going on in those groups is very minimal and they don’t provide enough incentives for me to actively engage in them. I am a fan of MOMA, but aside from emails regarding exhibition updates, there is no real interaction with me and MOMA, nor me and other fans of MOMA. You may blame us- saying that we could take more initiative, but I think it’s also a matter of the interface; the current interface is terrible in making a generative community.

I think it’s terrible that at the end of the day, Internet services are based on programs consisting of 0s and 1s and as someone who doesn’t know how to write these programs, I can’t implement any ideas without an engineer.

Sociable Network: a network of people who socialize based on mutual interest of a certain topic, person, or network. The difference between a social network and a sociable network is that the latter places less importance on the individual, and more on the common interest.

Obama Campaign and Games

Monday, October 13th, 2008

When Alec Ross said that the Obama campaign was “citizen-centered” and that it invested in new media tools, I bet he wasn’t referring to games. But Obama fans have taken it into their own hands to utilize games for political support. It is somewhat ironic, since Obama has spoken of video games in a negative context regarding child education. Rather, Obama fans are expanding their interpretation of his policy stance on technology and freedom on the Internet.

* Video game maniac Rey Gutierrez is going to host a five-day gaming marathon to support Obama and Biden from Oct. 20 to 25. The “Gaming for Obama” marathon will be broadcast on Justin.tv. Gutierrez is also a VH1 personality from Brooke Knows Best. There is no fund-raising, just gathering of people to play games- the act of gaming itself will be considered an act of support for Obama (hm….) Gutierrez is targeting the Hispanic community, something that will be great for the Obama campaign.

A screenshot from Burnout Paradise taken by JeffSon (click pic for link)
A screenshot from Burnout Paradise taken by JeffSon

*This product placement (person placement?) ad in Burnout Paradise shows an Obama ad on a billboard. Companies have been using a lot of these billboard ads (especially in racing games), so the concept isn’t new- just interesting because it’s a form of political campaigning that hasn’t really been seen before. More about this in GamePolitics.

*Midcourt, a Second Life citizen, held a fund raising campaign at a SL nightclub. The money was raised in Linden dollars, and later added up to slightly over $600. Quite impressive, considering the Linden-U.S. Dollar exchange rate.

Disclaimer: I am a non-U.S. citizen and not an Obama fan (nor a McCain fan for that matter)