You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Category Archives: Pierre de Vries

Internet and Politics 2008: Moving People, Moving Ideas

A Working Hypothesis Responses include: The New Activism: Why Volunteering Declined in Campaign 08, by Ari Melber, Participation and Polarization in the Networked Public Sphere, by Henry Farrell, A Response to Working Hypothesis for Internet and Politics 2008, by Sunshine Hillygus, The Revolution of the Online Commentariat, by Peter Daou, Not the Digital Democracy We […]

Learning to Love the Rules

essay by Wendy Seltzer, a response to David Weinberger. “Rules are norms that have failed,” David Weinberger says in “Tacit Governance.” While his description rings true, the need for formalized governance is a sign of success, not failure. Our challenge is to move from norms to rules, building rules for the Internet that offer the […]

Internet Forestry: A Principles Approach to Governance

essay by Pierre de Vries, a response to David Weinberger. Are forests governed tacitly or explicitly? In the woodland near my house, only the red alder knows how to make its leaves, and the red huckleberry and skunk cabbage pick their ideal spots without having to be told. The shrews and raccoons decide what to […]

Why Tacit Governance of the Net is an Imperative

essay by JP Rangaswami, a response to David Weinberger and David Johnson. Human beings are complex adaptive systems. We’re surrounded by such systems, in nature and in society: our immune systems, our bodies, the natural ecosystems around us, the very society we live in. The Net is no different, both in its complexity as well […]

The Virtues of Being Explicit – A Reply to “Tacit Governance”

essay by David Johnson, a response to David Weinberger. David Weinberger’s essay suggests that we are better off, at least in the realm of “governance” of online activities, when we don’t (or don’t have to) write things down. His point makes sense with regard to certain types of online groups, engaged primarily in discussion rather […]

Steering to the Edge of Trust

essay by Kevin Werbach, a response to David Weinberger. David Weinberger’s essay demonstrates that what we do know, but don’t formalize, can actually help us. His analysis is characteristically deep and provocative. However, the parts he leaves out demand a closer look. The real action lies at the interface between tacit and explicit governance mechanisms […]

Governance – Tacit or Explicit?

essay by Esther Dyson, a response to David Weinberger. The whole point of the net is that it is decentralized and heterogeneous: One size need not fit all. Thus there is no need to resolve the question of whether tacit or explicit rules are better for online communities. But you can ask when to use […]

Tacit Governance

Since governance is, like speaking, co-extensive with the rise of civilization, it’s curious that it has such a bad name. Or perhaps it’s not so curious. Governance, as an explicit social structure, codified and implemented, arises when tacit governance fails. At its best, explicit governance is a response to a breakdown. It rarely restores a society to its prior, unbroken state…