You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.
25 July 2006

Floyd and doping

I wanted to believe that Tyler Hamilton hadn’t doped two years ago. I think Lance Armstrong probably doped at some point or another (which I don’t think takes away from his achievement at winning 7 straight Tours). (His achievements as a person, however….) And I hope that the only doping that Floyd did was this sort:

Dopez vous au lait!

Here’s some of the reasoning that I think helps to support the idea that Floyd hasn’t doped:

The numbers on Wednesday, Lim said, showed that Landis’s collapse was not caused by a single factor like lack of food or water. Rather, his bad day was much like what eventually happens to a sleep-deprived student at exam time: his overtaxed body forced him to take a break. After he slowed down and lost the lead, Mr. Landis’s average power output fell by about one-third.

Before cyclists began adopting illicit methods for boosting their levels of oxygen-rich red cells during the 1990’s, such events were so common that French riders called them “jours sans,” or “days without.” During this year’s Tour, which saw several favorites excluded because of doping investigations, jours sans have made something of a comeback.

For Landis, Lim said, the enforced break from the action during his collapse probably gave him an edge on the following, winning day.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “Floyd and doping”

  1. PP Says:

    keep hoping. Story right now is he tested positive for high levels of testosterone after the big comeback. Then again after pulling off one of the greatest single day comebacks ever, maybe the boys would be overproducing naturally, who knows.

  2. Fritz Says:

    Major bummer. *sigh*

  3. andrew Says:

    B sample came back positive.