CSRC Asks Fund Houses to Maintain Stability of Stock Market

证监会要求基金坚持长期理念价值投资

2008年03月31日03:45

来源:中国证券网.上海证券报
⊙本报记者 商文

为了更好地落实《基金管理公司特定客户资产管理业务试点办法》和《证券投资基金管理公司公平交易制度指导意见》,中国证监会基金部日前召开会议,对基金管理公司开展特定客户资产管理业务明确提出了三项要求。
Continue reading →

Caijing Magazine: Chinese Open-ended Securities Investment Funds Facing Massive Redemption

基金赎回快速增多

网络版专稿 记者 邓美玲 随着大盘的节节下挫,基金赎回也呈加速态势。各家地方媒体的报道显示,在全国各大主要城市均出现了赎回加速的现象。但对于赎回高潮何时出现,业界人士和专家看法不一。
Continue reading →

How will Chinese Securities Market change in 2008?

How will Chinese Securities Market change in 2008?

Maybe we can find some clue from Wen Jiabao’s 2008 government report, in which he defines the job of government in 2008 is to “… convert SOEs into stockholding corporations;” “…improve corporate governance, carry out policy-mandated closures and bankruptcies, separate SOEs’ secondary businesses from their core businesses, and convert the former into independent companies; “”…improve the structure of the capital market, promote steady and sound development of the stock markets, strive to improve the performance of listed companies, and maintain an open, fair and equitable market environment.”

Note that there is no such things in Wen’s report as “protection of minority shareholder” or “solve the problem of controlling shareholder’s abuse of power in securities market.” The government’s priority is rather the the reform of SOEs. The securities market is an instrument in such reform, not a goal by itself. Hence we can predict that in 2008, although securities market reform will continue, it will not bring in any fundamental change. Chinese minority shareholders–1600 million in total according to CSRC’s latest update–expected that the government could redeem the securities market from a casino style one, but the government now has let them down. The market will continue to be a playground of SOEs. If they do better this year, which is very unlikely to happen, the benefits may trickle down to the minority shareholders under the condition that the epidemic market speculation is uprooted, which is also very unlikely to happen.

It doesn’t sound good to securities investors. Well, don’t jump to conclusion so quickly. I have to stress that my comment is solely based on the publicly available government report, and it is well known that Chinese government does not always put everything under the sun. The government may very well have an agenda that does not closely follow the report.

See full text of the 2008 Chinese government report.

China is now called “authoritarian capitalism”

Joshua Kurlantzick published a comment on Boston Globe called State Inc.  Kurlantzick discusses “authoritarian capitalism,” by which he refers to the countries that have state owned companies and a capitalist economy, such as, China, the United Arab Emirates and Russia.

The author notices that

Over the past 25 years, while keeping firm control over its economy, China has adopted many of the tools of capitalism – ceding some operational power to a Western-trained executive class, inviting foreign investment and partnerships, and buying and selling on the global open market.

Beijing has also selected a range of strategic industries to develop, from oil to telecommunications to automobiles. By creating the state-owned China National Chemical Corporation in 2004, Beijing birthed a plastics manufacturing giant, one that quickly swallowed foreign companies like Qenos, one of the biggest plastics firms in Australia. State-owned Chinese automaker Nanjing Automobile bought up famed British car brand MG Rover, while Huawei, boosted by massive loans from state-linked Chinese banks, has expanded around the globe, even trying to take over US tech giant 3Com, a deal essentially scuttled by Congress.

The article can be found here.

黎曼兄弟看好中国跨国并购业务

Lehman Brothers’ China Strategy

Lehman Brothers sees lots of opportunity for Chinese companies making M&A plays outside their home border. But plenty of big banking fees hang on an important question: Will other countries accept China as a bonafide buyer or not?

WSJ colleague Rick Carew in Hong Kong interviewed Lehman Brothers’ head of investment banking for the Asia-Pacific region, Glenn Schiffman. Schiffman acknowledged that capital markets are not very strong in China right now, but had high hopes for cross-border M&A.

“Early last year, all our bankers gathered together to map out the opportunities for deals in Asia,” Schiffman told Carew. “One area they highlighted was cross-border M&A.”

…

Chinese firms struggle as state support flags

By Kirby Chien

BEIJING, March 18 (Reuters) – Soaring costs are squeezing Chinese companies, but pleas from executives for government relief are falling mostly on deaf ears.

As Beijing tempers the push for export-driven growth with concern for long-neglected worker rights and environmental protection, even powerful businesses have not been getting their own way at the annual gathering of China’s parliament.

Much of the corporate grumbling at the two-week-long National People’s Congress, which ends on Tuesday, has been about a labour contract law that went into effect on Jan. 1.

Critics say the law makes it harder to fire workers, hurts competitiveness and could lead to more bankruptcies.

Zong Qinghou, chairman of Hangzhou Wahaha Group, China’s top beverage firm, used his pulpit as a Congress delegate to complain that the law was a step backward to the days of the “iron rice bowl” when state-owned firms provided cradle-to-grave welfare for the world’s largest workforce.

“It isn’t reasonable,” Zong said. “We must protect workers, but uncompetitive businesses would hurt workers even more.”

That sentiment was widespread, but still seemed to carry little weight with officials.

“The issue now is not revision, but full enforcement,” Sun Baoshu, vice-minister of labour and social security, told reporters.

More…