When film buffs hear “Antitrust: the Movie,” they probably think of the 2001 flick,
starring Ryan Phillippe, Claire Forlani, and Tim Robbins. Well, expand your mind and your
book shelf for another antitrust video, with a more realistic plot and plenty of heroes — Antitrust the
Documentary. The new video will be made for tv and for classrooms, and made possible by an award
of $496,000 granted as part of the Vitamin Cases Consumer Settlement Fund (Judicial Council Coordination
Proceeding No. 4076 Master File No. 301803, San Francisco County; approved September 8, 2004).
As a press release posted today by the American Antitrust Institute explains:
A California court has awarded to the American Antitrust Institute a grant of nearly
half-million dollars to educate California consumers and businesses about the benefits
of the antitrust laws, including the production of a half-hour documentary video for a
television audience and educational materials for high school classrooms.1 The video
will present stories about several actual antitrust cases, demonstrating the harm to
consumers and ways in which the federal government, state government, and private
attorneys brought relief.
A blue ribbon panel of attorneys, economists, and educators in California will advise
on the cases to be presented and a diverse “project team” will provide continuing advice
on quality and tone of the film and other materials.
AAI has selected The Filmmakers Collaborative in
San Francisco to produce and distribute the video. In addition, the video will be modified
for use within a high school curriculum.
The AAI, in conjunction with Street Law, Inc., and the Constitutional Rights Foundation,
will develop and distribute teaching and text materials, and train teachers in California so
that an antitrust section can be inserted into various social science curricula.
With his usual flair for understatement, AAI President Bert Foer explained further:
“Although antitrust may sound like an esoteric and painfully dry topic, it is actually full of drama
with important economic and political implications that often escape public attention. Our film and
materials will be objectively presented, colorful and provocative. They should stimulate a great deal
of interest about the need for promoting and protecting competition in our economy.”
Our Prof. Yabut wonders just what the folks at Von Mises Institute (see Antitrust: The Case for Repeal),
the Competitive Enterprise Institute , and the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism [f/k/a. Center for
the Moral Defense of Capitalism] will have to say about this. Perhaps, they’ll be pleadin’ “Mamas, don’t let
your babies grow up to be antitrust lawyers.”
If you’d like to learn right now about the benefits of antitrust for consumers, go to the annotated links in AAI’s
Guide to Antitrust Resources on the Web. (We suggest the EU brochure.) Click here to learn about other
projects funded through the Vitamin Case Settlement Fund.
While you have AAI and Bert Foer on your mind, I suggest reading his op/ed piece on
Social Security and Antitrust (FTC:WATCH, Jan. 31, 2005). Bert summarizes:
“We seem to have made the choice to place more stress on the individual
by putting the individual ever more at risk within the economic sphere,
while reducing the role of the safety net. How much more stress will people
accept before they rebel against the very idea of free markets? Protect or
protectionism: that is the question.”
the thief
is just as he is…
hazy moon
first frost–
flower sellers in a row
hitting their bells
Kobyashi Issa, translated by David G. Lanoue
February 10, 2005
antitrust: the video (and textbook)
1 Comment
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
[…] As explained in “Antitrust the Video” (f/k/a, Feb. 10, 2005), an award of $496,000 was granted to the American Antitrust Institute to educate California consumers and businesses about the benefits of the antitrust laws by producing an educational video on the history, purpose and benefits of the antitrust laws. The award came from the Vitamin Cases Consumer Settlement Fund (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4076 Master File No. 301803, San Francisco County; approved September 8, 2004). The case was brought by the State of California and private plaintiffs under antitrust law, alleging that consumers were harmed by a price-fixing scheme of the vitamin manufacturers. […]
Comment by shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress » Blog Archive » antitrust primer video wins Silver Telly Award — March 7, 2007 @ 1:37 am