Earlier today, ethicalEsq hijacked this website in order to discuss religious law schools 
(see our previous post), raising the ire of the customarily stoic haikuEsq. Thankfully,
Prof. Yabut came out of retirement to compose the following exercises in issue-spotting.
Go, ahead, test your legal knowledge and your faith.
Family Law: In the case of Joseph of Nazareth v. B.V. Mary, the husband is suing for
divorce and custody of the couple’s infant child, Jesse. Petitioner claims that Respondent
will not fulfill her marital obligations and has been seen in the company of Three Magi, using
frankincense. Respondent counters that Joseph is not the biological father of the infant and
married her knowing of her condition and commitments; she refuses to speak the name of the
purported father. DNA evidence is not admissible in this jurisdiction. Should the divorce
be granted, which party should have custody, and is another Visitation appropriate?
Landlord-Tenant In the matter of Noah v. Al. God . . . — click here to read this entire posting, which also covers Criminal and Constitutional Law issues, plus
an ark-full of other questions for Additional Credit —
today even the pigeon
says a prayer…
first winter rain
a hot bath
a prayer
then cherry blossoms!
Issa, translated by David G. Lanoue
p.s. The various alter egoes responsible for this weblog wish one and all a Thanksgiving
filled with love and gratitude. We also promise to return to one-breath punditry immediately.