Devaluing anonymous political feedback

I was talking to Robert Winters this week at the Citizen Media Unconference and he mentioned talking to someone on the Cambridge (MA) school board who just tossed any anonymous messages about school board issues.

He admitted that he devalues any anonymous message. What if it’s from a political shill? Yes, but what if it’s from someone who feels chilling effects against expression?

Since I started working for Tor I’ve heard lots of stories about chilling effects. I can imagine a dozen reasons for people to want to give anonymous feedback to the school board. What if it gets back to my kid’s teacher and impacts her treatment? What if I have a contract with the city? What if I am involved in a private school, but my kid attends public schools — but if I comment, it could be taken to be sniping because of my job?

But even devaluing the feedback is better than tossing it. Go figure — the calculation still works. A political shill giving illegitimate feedback has their feedback devalued, which minimizes damage. But the chilled response gets heard, at least a little, which is better than if that person had never spoken out at all.

Ideally, as trust is built, perhaps the formerly chilled person will contact the school board member in person and say, “I sent you that anonymous message about [this issue], and I want to tell you, I’m glad I did because you did something about it.” It could help build the fabric of participation by allowing a trust-building phase.
Of course, this works for folks like Robert Winters, who would read but devalue the message, but not for the school board member using the round file.

23 Responses to “Devaluing anonymous political feedback”

  1. Линукс says:

    I was talking to Robert Winters this week at the Citizen Media Unconference and he mentioned talking to someone on the Cambridge (MA) school board who just tossed any anonymous messages about school board issues.

  2. Ideally, as trust is built, perhaps the formerly chilled person will contact the school board member in person and say, “I sent you that anonymous message about [this issue], and I want to tell you, I’m glad I did because you did something about it.” It could help build the fabric of participation by allowing a trust-building phase.

  3. Sanyo says:

    He admitted that he devalues any anonymous message. What if it’s from a political shill? Yes, but what if it’s from someone who feels chilling effects against expression?

  4. thank you master very nice comp We hope this year will end the economic crisis

  5. v3n says:

    Thank you, anonymous.

  6. Hi, I hope it’s good for my writing assignments, if I get a note if I do not repeat here

  7. Cabinets says:

    There is a lot of great information here.

  8. if I get a note if I do not repeat here

  9. I agree that some things probably could be done differently and to greater effect

  10. I had trouble finding this information on the Internet!

  11. I would like to appreciate the great work done by You

  12. AC says:

    Really usefull info.Thanks!!!

  13. I agree with you, thanks, good article.

  14. toner dolum says:

    I agree with you, Thank you for follwings.

  15. What if it’s from a political shill? Yes, but what if it’s from someone who feels chilling effects against expression?

    Thanks and keep doing this good work!

  16. gcse says:

    You make a good point about the feedback getting back to the teachers at school.

  17. jonipopi says:

    It’s a complicated topic but you did it well.

  18. The value of anonymous feedback continues to fall as spiteful social media comment increases

  19. Just because a comment is anonymous doesen’t necessarily mean it is untrue

  20. Ivto says:

    Great post, tnx for the article!