Whether NPR or FOX, the news reporters’ currency is fair, objective
reporting… except when it comes to the weather. As the New Yorker’s
“Dawn Patrol” (August 8/15, no longer online) pointed out, the weather
report is really for entertainment and reassurance value, not its
factual content. Newspapers and TV stations have ombudsmen and some
semblance of professional commitment to minimize the impact of
editorial opinion on news reporting, but all such pretensions are shed
when it comes to the weather.
Recently, for example, WBUR’s morning edition has had no problem
proclaiming “beautiful weather on tap today” (btw, why is weather
always “on tap” in WBUR-land;
is it ever really good enough to get drunk on?), even when the opinion
behind the claim is questionable. Highs in the upper 80s is
“beautiful”? Only if broadcasting live from the beach!
My point is simply that one man’s “beautiful day” is another’s
nightmare. Besides, how do you think the day feels when it’s judged to
be “beautiful” or, more commonly, not? Sure is a heavy expectation to
lay on a single day.
I remember arching an eyebrow at a series of New York Times weather
boxes that predicted “brilliant” weather for the day back in early
summer, 1997. Amazingly, the Times later ran an article somewhat
abashedly retracting its over-exuberant reporting (this was the Times,
after all). So, how about it WBUR — a little bit more objectivity in
your weather reporting? After all, highs in the mid-70s and low
humidity pretty much speaks for itself.