Pi Pi Pi



Something bothers me about a foolish assumption I keep hearing. Many Democrats but also Republicans, including Olympia Snow of Maine and Bob Dole, have declared that we know the soldiers who perpetrated the abuses against Iraqis were following orders because these reservists couldn’t have thought of the various humiliations themselves.


P-lease. Go to any college fraternity or sorority in the country during hazings; go the bathroom in a tough high school (not my old high school, but I’ve heard). Forget that, go to domestic prisons and jails. These declarations assume that “ordinary” folks (the frequent use of “reservists” condescendingly implies simpletons from Iowa or some other vowel-starting state) couldn’t come up with the torments we’ve seen because (1) they’re too decent and (2) they’re not clever enough. That’s how I read the comments, anyway.


The abuses may very well have been ordered. But the images of the abuses themselves don’t prove that or, the way I see it, even imply it. In any given population, there’s a number of people capable of deep sociopathic behavior (not the same as saying there’s a number of sociopaths) — especially when put in groups. The abuses were so sloppy and pointless, as far as interrogation methods go, it actually seems to suggest that the plans for them (to whatever extent they existed) didn’t go very far up. I saw Lyndie England interviewed and she claims her actions were ordered by soldiers of “higher rank.” Now, England is a private first class. I’m not an expert on military rank, but wouldn’t anyone be of higher rank than her? Gene I think you’re higher rank than she is. Obviously a handful (small or large) of soldiers were involved and probably were a grab-bag of ranks. An aside: she seemed to me barely coherent.


That’s not to say there weren’t orders from above — or the equivalent through neglect or poisoned atmosphere. But the pictures aren’t evidence in themselves for that point.


Oh, a related gripe. All the talk of how the humiliation was specifically mortifying to Muslims. Hm. Maybe. But again — humiliation, hazing, are pretty similar here, aren’t they? I mean, would the same soldiers, if they wanted to humiliate Americans, have overdressed them in heavy clothes? Not to make light of it, I just think it’s a projection.


Wow, a heavy first post. Gene, I’ll have to listen to that O’Reilly interview. I saw him talking about it on his show and he persuaded me he was sandbagged. But I didn’t hear the actual NPR interview. I think I have some thoughts on TV commercials and comics, too. Am on a slow computer because I’m visiting my family. Where are all the other ex-roommates?

Globe needs better columnists, part I: the token conservative

Every morning, in place of coffee, I read the Globe to wake myself
up. This works because the Globe publishes an infuriating mix of sloppy
journalism and sloppier opinions. (Actually I start first with the comics because their general banality and lack
of artistry are a good way to warm up). It’s the opinion pieces I agree
with that annoy me the most, because, well, they’re often
embarrassingly insipid. But let’s save that for Part II.

I feel bad criticizing Jeff Jacoby because I’d be picking on the token
[fill in the oppressed minority group here], and we liberals like to
stroke the self-esteem of those people. Well, except when we think
they’re morons. Like today, in response to media coverage of the Abu
Ghraib scandal:

What exactly is the governing rule here? That incendiary images sure to
enrage our enemies and get more Americans killed should be published
while images that show the world just how evil those enemies really are
should be suppressed?

It amuses me how, with this attack on the media, Jacoby
also manages to prop up the image of the omnipotent American media, and
by extention, himself. Yes, Jeffrey, local Arab media publish
“incendiary images” too. No, I don’t think CBS News or Newsweek reaches
quite the same target demographic of enraged enemies as, let’s just pick one
randomly… Al Jazeera.
(Jacoby tries to cover up the big hole in his argument with creative
use of the passive tense: “Nick Berg lost his life because the Abu
Ghraib pictures were turned into a worldwide media event” — but who,
exactly, did the turning?)

But, let’s put aside media self-aggrandizement, which
basically all journalists engage in. Jacoby’s just a crappy writer.
What is his use of the “Yes, Virginia
clich

Arlo & Janis Makeover!

Jimmy Johnson’s giving Janis another makeover… I can remember the
last time he did this and ended up with the current saucepan-for-hair
look, which honestly, I rather like… though I do agree Janis — and
Arlo — can sometimes look somewhat baboonish. I guess I’d vote for “the tweak,” though there are still more candidates to be seen.

I’m also excited that A&J’s now got its own website. I had a brief correspondence with Johnson in ’99 (I admit feeling a bit like Jumpstart’s Frank with his obsession for “Klondike Ike“), and he told me at the time there were no plans for a new A&J book (the only one I know of is out of print from ’89). The website serves up some great strips and somewhat makes up for the lack of a bound-paper archive.

(BTW, I hope Gene hasn’t disappeared into the great blue… he’s a great character, and I miss him too!)


Update (5/14/04): You can now vote for Janis’s hairstyle. I was waivering between the “Tweak” and the “Waif” and decided to go for the less popular one. By the way, you should absolutely read Johnson’s description of each style — they are hilarious.

Casting Shame on Westbury (or is it Levittown?)

I’m ashamed that Bill O’Reilly hails from my own neighborhood, the Salisbury part of Westbury (which he calls the “Westbury part of Levittown”) — ashamed that we had produced such an uncivil, demagogic bully. 

(By the way, whatever you call Salisbury, it ain’t  Levittown; on the contrary, kids from the real “Westbury part of Levittown” went to Clarke High School,
in the East Meadow School District, which extended halfway through
W-bury and conveniently stopped at Old Country Road, right where the
African-American
community begins. That’s the real “Westbury part of Westbury,” if there is such a place).

So, O’Reilly choreographs a hissy-fit on Fresh Air with Terry Gross so he can bash NPR and sell more books — surprise. And now he refuses to relicense segments of their interview.
Still, after listening to the bad behavior (and bad acting) that passes
for a celibrity tantrum, I think O’Reilly doesn’t hold a candle to Gene Simmons.