{"id":798,"date":"2007-09-03T21:22:38","date_gmt":"2007-09-04T04:22:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2007\/09\/03\/more-on-black-press-scandal\/"},"modified":"2007-10-09T09:26:51","modified_gmt":"2007-10-09T16:26:51","slug":"more-on-black-press-scandal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2007\/09\/03\/more-on-black-press-scandal\/","title":{"rendered":"More on Black Press scandal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2007\/08\/21\/another-victoria-newspaper-scandal-being-ignored-by-newspapers\/\">August 21<\/a> I wrote about the scandal brewing at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bcnewsgroup.com\/\">Black Press<\/a> here in Victoria, which I learned about through &#8212; and which was otherwise consistently covered <em>only<\/em> by &#8212; local political writer and blogger <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publiceyeonline.com\/\">Sean Holman<\/a>.  The whole story was otherwise <em>largely<\/em> ignored.  (On Aug.28, I added an update to the original entry, again adding more information from Holman&#8217;s updates.)<\/p>\n<p>The story appears to be fading slowly from view, which I find pretty appalling.  There is one other update, again from Sean Holman, who on August 29 wrote his last (to date) entry on the topic: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publiceyeonline.com\/archives\/002624.html\">Black on Black<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Go read it for yourself &#8212; it&#8217;s lengthy and complex, and shows that when corporations put out fires, it&#8217;s not necessarily a fine art, but rather something conjured by sheer &#8220;because I say so&#8221; power.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s also depressing to see that comments have apparently dried up around this topic.  It&#8217;s as if the reporters and some staff cared, initially, but the reading public is dumb, oblivious, and anaesthetized.  Or jaded, which may be the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>And as predicted by many, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaymag.com\/\">Monday Magazine<\/a>, despite its pretence of being critical and anti-corporatist, has been breathtakingly silent on the issue.  Why?  Ever-so-alternative &lt;kof&gt; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaymag.com\/\">Monday<\/a> is owned by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bcnewsgroup.com\/\">Black Press<\/a>, and I guess staff at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaymag.com\/\">Monday<\/a> know which side of the ass their cheek is buttered on.<\/p>\n<p>Also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publiceyeonline.com\/archives\/002624.html\">read Holman&#8217;s entry<\/a> and see that the other thing that&#8217;s alive and well is the corporate art of playing &#8220;po&#8217; me,&#8221; as in: claiming that the big ol&#8217; daily newspaper (the <em>Times-Colonist<\/em>) has it easy because people pay to read it, so therefore the &#8220;free&#8221; community newspapers have to put themselves in bondage to their masters, the advertisers, upon whom they rely for revenue.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, give me a break already.  If that&#8217;s your business model, I suppose it explains why you don&#8217;t have to care about the quality or integrity or timeliness of your editorial content.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, I believe the <em>Times-Colonist<\/em> already scooped <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bcnewsgroup.com\/\">Black Press<\/a> on how to bend over for advertisers, in the process eschewing quality editorial content: who can forget the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2006\/07\/20\/something-about-not-blogging-anymore\/\">Vivian Smith affair<\/a>?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On August 21 I wrote about the scandal brewing at Black Press here in Victoria, which I learned about through &#8212; and which was otherwise consistently covered only by &#8212; local political writer and blogger Sean Holman. The whole story was otherwise largely ignored. (On Aug.28, I added an update to the original entry, again [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2052,1899,1898,1895,1418],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-black_press","category-free_press","category-newspapers","category-times_colonist","category-victoria"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}