{"id":5640,"date":"2013-11-29T14:22:48","date_gmt":"2013-11-29T19:22:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=5640"},"modified":"2013-11-29T14:22:48","modified_gmt":"2013-11-29T19:22:48","slug":"the-day-after-thanksgiving-no-wait-thanksgiving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2013\/11\/29\/the-day-after-thanksgiving-no-wait-thanksgiving\/","title":{"rendered":"The day after Thanksgiving. No, wait. Thanksgiving."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Today is Black Friday. It has for a long time been the start of the Holiday shopping season, and, went the thinking, if retailers could get shoppers into stores today \u2013 the day after our Thanksgiving holiday \u2013 they had a reasonable chance of getting &#8220;in the black,&#8221; that is, having a profitable season.<\/p>\n<p>Black Friday was supposed to be a kind of litmus test that would indicate whether consumers were willing to spend enough in the remaining days of the holiday season to bring up retailer profits (or whether there would be <em>any<\/em> profits at all).<\/p>\n<p>Well, that&#8217;s obviously all gone out the window because now some stores are opening <strong>on<\/strong> Thanksgiving. In a seemingly continuous non-stop race to the bottom, Thanksgiving, which had a certain magic about it <em>because it was non-religious and <strong>non-gifting<\/strong><\/em> (i.e., <em><strong>not<\/strong> linked to <strong>shopping<\/strong><\/em>),\u00a0 is now removed from that <em>privileged place of non-consumption<\/em>. Instead, it&#8217;s more and more a day like any other: <em>Go forth and shop<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>As one 18-year old Thanksgiving shopper put it while standing online with a pal at a suburban Chicago mall, \u201cThanksgiving dinner is over&#8230;\u00a0 And there\u2019s nothing else to do.\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/11\/30\/business\/young-bored-and-looking-for-a-deal.html?_r=0&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1385744985-4qJTiuviBza3ydao+RTqDg\">source<\/a>) I seriously expected her to say, &#8220;Thanksgiving dinner is\u00a0<em>so<\/em> over,&#8221; that is: we&#8217;re not doing that anymore.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings me to another pet peeve: the so-called politically correct crowd that gets its kicks from pointing out that white settlers screwed the indigenous population, that this happened at &#8220;the original&#8221; Thanksgiving, and that therefore <em>all<\/em> Thanksgiving festivities are a sham if not outright a white man&#8217;s plot to keep injustice alive.<\/p>\n<p>I have news for you, dear Leftie comrades of mine: you are the latter-day stirrup holders of the bourgeoisie, except now you&#8217;re holding the stirrups for the oligarchic disrupter class. Your corrosive criticism of Thanksgiving as a &#8220;white man&#8217;s&#8221; holiday that somehow represents the oppression of Native populations is the hand that reaches across an ever-diminishing Thanksgiving gathering table to shake the hand of today&#8217;s ultra-capitalism.<\/p>\n<p>Hey, if Thanksgiving <em>is<\/em> just a sham, if Thanksgiving <em>isn&#8217;t<\/em> actually the nice holiday we were told it was, then <em>why not turn it into a day like any other?<\/em> And so the capitalist disrupter smiles, sits down to his fully-larded table, while the rest of us are harried into ever-greater sacrifices &#8230;<em>for the effing economy!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Excuse me while my head explodes.<\/p>\n<p>To whit: yesterday I read an article in one of my favorite news sources that claimed it was ok to shop on Thanksgiving because <em>the economy needs it<\/em>. (<a href=\"http:\/\/qz.com\/152152\/go-ahead-and-shop-on-thanksgiving-the-us-economy-is-counting-on-you\/\">source<\/a>) Who is this &#8220;economy&#8221; and why does it need my blood? Ok, that&#8217;s a silly rhetorical question because of course I know why it needs my and your blood. But really? This is the best case the writer can make? It was also interesting to me, an immigrant twice over (first to Canada, then to the U.S.) to see the author, who was born in the U.S. but is of Indian extraction, born to immigrant parents, bolster her case this way:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Some countries actually embrace the US system of more work, less pay. Multinationals especially deal with large variances in different countries\u2019 holiday calendars. Their solution often is to offer a more liberal number of <strong>personal days<\/strong> so employees can <strong>pick and choose the holidays of importance to them<\/strong>. In countries such as India\u2014which, like the United States, has a polyglot of faiths and cultures across its workforce\u2014some state governments have been trying to limit the number of official holidays. [emphasis added]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t celebrate any religious holiday, I&#8217;m fine with that. But Thanksgiving was never an expressly religious holiday \u2013 it has <em>nothing<\/em> to do with &#8220;polyglot[s] of faiths and cultures.&#8221; It was simply a holiday: a day to stop, cook a good meal, sit down together, break bread, be peaceful (just for a bit), and give thanks. That&#8217;s all.<\/p>\n<p>But now, here we are: in all, Thanksgiving has been &#8220;exposed&#8221; by my Leftie friends as a vile white man&#8217;s holiday whose origins lie in the oppression of Native populations; youthful &#8220;innovators&#8221; tell us that the economy needs us to go shopping; and &#8220;disrupters&#8221; of all stripes tell us that we live in an age of extreme personalization, whether it&#8217;s in the Quantified Self movement or our social media personae, so why shouldn&#8217;t I <strong>pick and choose the holidays<\/strong>, too? I mean, isn&#8217;t social media all about creating my <em>tribe<\/em>, man, that ultra-personal self-expression of mine that&#8217;s just about the effing same as everybody else&#8217;s, except I can spend personalized money on mine? If I&#8217;ve got my tribe, why should I bother with something as corny (and destructive to our holier-than-thou 1%-enriching economy) as a non-gifting, non-shopping, boring old dinner-based holiday? (And by the way: if everybody is off in their personal and personalized <em>tribe<\/em>, there will be no more unions, and without unionized bargaining power, there will be more oppression of people, irrespective of whether their skin color is white or brown or black or anything in between. Continue to splinter into tribes, children, and The Man will eat your effing lunch.)<\/p>\n<p>As for the argument that shopping shopping shopping consumption consumption consumption is absolutely necessary to keep the economy going, ask yourself what kind of economy we&#8217;re enabling. Heck, back in the day that swine Henry Ford at least made sure his workers made enough money to buy a family car. Today&#8217;s equivalent industry moguls? Not so much. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/11\/29\/business\/on-registers-other-side-little-money-to-spend.html?hp\">see this<\/a>) We&#8217;re all in love with the Creepy Crawleys of Downton Abbey, worshiping their wealth and &#8220;glamor.&#8221; But even they took better care of &#8220;their&#8221; workers than the Waltons of Wal-Mart do.<\/p>\n<p><em>Was tun?<\/em> you may ask. Well, there is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.adbusters.org\/campaigns\/bnd\">Buy Nothing Day<\/a>, although I have to admit it always sat the wrong way with me (not sure why).\u00a0 And there&#8217;s the buy local movement (see <a href=\"http:\/\/creativemornings.com\/talks\/katrina-scotto-di-carlo\/1\">Katrina Scotto di Carlo&#8217;s excellent talk at Portland Oregon&#8217;s Creative Mornings<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Beyond that, it&#8217;s up to government and law makers to create protections for workers. Not sure however that there&#8217;s much to be done about the sheeple who take advantage of all the glorious opportunities to buy ever more junk no one (not even they themselves) need.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this brief rant I explain why I think the Left, with its critique of Thanksgiving as a holiday rooted in the white man&#8217;s oppression of Native populations, helps to enable hyper-capitalism&#8217;s 24\/7\/365 shopping encroachment on this holiday. Together, we&#8217;re in a race to the bottom.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99,1002],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-social_critique"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5640"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5646,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5640\/revisions\/5646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}