{"id":3545,"date":"2010-09-01T23:08:46","date_gmt":"2010-09-02T06:08:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=3545"},"modified":"2010-09-01T23:08:46","modified_gmt":"2010-09-02T06:08:46","slug":"connect-the-dots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2010\/09\/01\/connect-the-dots\/","title":{"rendered":"Connect the dots"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Three articles popped up on my radar in the last few days. I got the impression there is a connection between them &#8211; all three chronicle a kind of hijacking of democracy and &#8211; dare I say it? &#8211; meritocracy in favor of expedience and will to power. Prepare to be disposable, they seem to suggest.<\/p>\n<p>First, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wadhwa.com\/\">Vivek Wadhwa<\/a> on <a href=\"http:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2010\/08\/28\/silicon-valley%E2%80%99s-dark-secret-it%E2%80%99s-all-about-age\/\">Silicon Valley\u2019s Dark Secret: It\u2019s All About Age<\/a>. Brilliant piece, reminds me of his talk on the difficulties in finding the women and minorities in tech:\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/wilkins.law.harvard.edu\/events\/luncheons\/2010-07-20_wadhwa\/2010-07-20_wadhwa640.mov\">video here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Wadhwa&#8217;s most recent article builds as well on his observations in a 2008 <em>Business Week<\/em> article, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/smallbiz\/content\/apr2008\/sb20080430_430663.htm\">How to Foster Tech Entrepreneurship<\/a>. The thread that ties these pieces together (to my mind) is in how they illustrate a disconnect between reality &#8220;on the ground&#8221; and its various mediated forms.<\/p>\n<p>And what of that mediation? Read the August 28 opinion piece by Frank Rich in the <em>NYT<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/08\/29\/opinion\/29rich.html\">The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party<\/a>, and follow that up with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/books\/feature\/2010\/08\/25\/german_usa_working_life_ext2010\">&#8220;Were You Born on the Wrong Continent?&#8221;: America&#8217;s misguided culture of overwork<\/a> in the August 25 issue of <em>Slate<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Consider:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tea Partiers may share the Kochs\u2019 detestation of taxes, big government  and Obama. But there\u2019s a difference between mainstream conservatism and a  fringe agenda that tilts completely toward big business, whether on  Wall Street or in the Gulf of Mexico, while dismantling fundamental  government safety nets designed to protect the unemployed, public  health, workplace safety and the subsistence of the elderly.<\/p>\n<p>Yet inexorably the Koch agenda is morphing into the G.O.P. agenda&#8230;   Their program opposes a federal deficit, but has no objection to  running up trillions in red ink in tax cuts to corporations and the  superrich; apologizes to corporate malefactors like BP and derides money  put in escrow for oil spill victims as a \u201c<a title=\"An article from The Hill newspaper about Angle\u2019s reference to BP\u2019s escrow account.\" href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/e2-wire\/677-e2-wire\/107711-angle-reids-foe-calls-bp-claims-account-a-slush-fund\">slush fund<\/a>\u201d;  opposes the extension of unemployment benefits; and calls for a freeze  on federal regulations in an era when abuses  in the oil, financial,  mining, pharmaceutical and even egg industries (among others) have been  outrageous. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/08\/29\/opinion\/29rich.html\">Frank Rich\/ NYT<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Then, turn to Slate&#8217;s interview with <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Geoghegan\">Thomas Geoghegan<\/a>. Here&#8217;s his comment on measuring economic worth (especially if using GDP):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We don\u2019t have any material value of leisure time, which is extremely  valuable to people. We don\u2019t have any way of valuing what these European  public goods are really worth. You know, it\u2019s 50,000 dollars for  tuition at NYU and it\u2019s zero at Humboldt University in Berlin. So NYU  adds catastrophic amounts of GDP per capita and Humboldt adds nothing.  Between you and me, I\u2019d rather go to school at Humboldt.<\/p>\n<p>So much of the American economy is based on GDP that comes from  waste, environmental pillage, urban sprawl, bad planning, people going  farther and farther with no land use planning whatsoever and leading  more miserable lives. That GDP is thrown on top of all the GDP that  comes from gambling and fraud of one kind or another. It\u2019s a more  straightforward description of what Kenneth Rogoff and the Economist  would call the financialization of the American economy. That  transformation is a big part of the American economic model as it has  morphed in some very perverse directions in the last 30 or 40 years.  It\u2019s why the collapse here is going to take a much more serious  long-term toll in this country than in the decades ahead. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/books\/feature\/2010\/08\/25\/german_usa_working_life_ext2010\">Thomas Geoghegan in Slate<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The idea that&#8217;s mediated is to keep working harder, to keep bootstrapping, to innovate and to be entrepreneurial. This is great &#8211; seriously. Who wants to live in a world where everything is preordained? I don&#8217;t, so I agree it&#8217;s a nice ideal to believe in merit, in change, and all that. But at the same time there&#8217;s a reality working against that ideal &#8211; the reality created by those who either already have power or who are (in the case of the insane politics taking hold in the US) working to consolidate something quite different.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Three articles popped up on my radar in the last few days. I got the impression there is a connection between them &#8211; all three chronicle a kind of hijacking of democracy and &#8211; dare I say it? &#8211; meritocracy in favor of expedience and will to power. Prepare to be disposable, they seem to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[415,397,20138],"class_list":["post-3545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-economics","tag-economy","tag-vivek_wadhwa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3545"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3545\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3548,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3545\/revisions\/3548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}