{"id":2923,"date":"2010-06-22T23:20:15","date_gmt":"2010-06-23T06:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=2923"},"modified":"2010-06-22T23:20:15","modified_gmt":"2010-06-23T06:20:15","slug":"job-markets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2010\/06\/22\/job-markets\/","title":{"rendered":"Job markets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On June 20, the local paper (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescolonist.com\/\">Times-Colonist<\/a>) published a fascinating letter-to-the-editor by Reed Kirkpatrick, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timescolonist.com\/opinion\/letters\/arts+committee+Connections+everything+this+market\/3178310\/story.html\">Connections everything in this job market<\/a>. Kirkpatrick&#8217;s letter was a rebuttal to an earlier June 13 article by Maclean Kay, <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.canada.com\/victoriatimescolonist\/news\/comment\/story.html?id=147e4f32-5d59-473e-8006-918d80bd52cc\">Rooting for the promised labour shortage<\/a>. Kay&#8217;s somewhat rambling article eventually focused on a recent prediction about a coming labor shortage, and included (on <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.canada.com\/victoriatimescolonist\/news\/comment\/story.html?id=147e4f32-5d59-473e-8006-918d80bd52cc&amp;p=2\">page 2<\/a>) the following bit:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Victoria&#8217;s job market is breathtakingly tight and what is available tends to be scandalously low-paying &#8212; I found an ad asking for a chef with 10 years&#8217; experience and offering $10 an hour. Victoria is also an infamously cliquey town; if you don&#8217;t know the person who posted the ad, you&#8217;re probably not getting the job.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not to say networking isn&#8217;t important or worthwhile, but there&#8217;s networking and there&#8217;s something more like employment incest.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Employment incest&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s an excellent turn of phrase! Kay ends, however, on an optimistic note: that &#8220;an influx of well-trained, educated, talented job seekers&#8221; will be a &#8220;healthy correction&#8221; of Victoria&#8217;s job market.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yellow_brick_road\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"border: 6px solid white\" title=\"Yellow Brick Road\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/4\/40\/OzYellowAndRedBrick.JPG\" alt=\"\" width=\"134\" height=\"99\" \/><\/a>Will it? Can it?<\/p>\n<p>Kirkpatrick&#8217;s letter takes issue with Kay: <em>been there, done that<\/em>, he seems to be saying. He goes back to 2002 (incidentally the year that I moved back to Victoria) to describe a <em>Times-Colonist<\/em> initiative of publishing a &#8220;Jobs Wanted&#8221; section during that period&#8217;s 7% unemployment rate labor market. He describes how, in 2001, the BC government had laid many people off, which flooded the labor market with &#8230;um, &#8220;well-trained, educated, talented job seekers&#8221; (to use Kay&#8217;s words). And who got jobs in that climate? The well-connected:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Realizing that as an independent consultant I would experience difficulty in finding work, I contacted a number of professional people from the Jobs Wanted section. Eventually, we incorporated a business: our bread and butter would be bidding on government contracts. After submitting a number of unsuccessful proposals, we opted for a &#8220;debriefing.&#8221; I vividly recall being informed &#8220;your company had the best proposal but we had never heard of you.&#8221; I interpreted this to mean that we were not sufficiently connected.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve heard the same thing from quite a few people. Jobs are also described in such narrow terms that if a candidate is missing even one qualification, s\/he is eliminated from the pile of applicants. There&#8217;s no chance of taking a risk with a new hire, no expectations of being able to learn on the job.<\/p>\n<p>Kirkpatrick&#8217;s letter ends with the kind of realism that Thomas Hardy might approve:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The reality is that many skilled professionals are already here working as cleaners, taxi drivers, housekeepers and security guards. Unconnected, their professional lives have quite literally faded away.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I could add to that stories of people who are connected, but it doesn&#8217;t matter: if the jobs aren&#8217;t there, they aren&#8217;t there. End of story.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Unless you do that classic &#8220;reinvention&#8221; thing, which is a very popular thing to do around here. People want to live here for the lifestyle, for the natural beauty, but they can&#8217;t work in their careers &#8211; so they opt to reinvent themselves in new careers. This sometimes results in amazing creative journeys &#8211; or not. In usually means downsizing\/ earning less money, too.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know what other people have observed in their communities and cities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On June 20, the local paper (Times-Colonist) published a fascinating letter-to-the-editor by Reed Kirkpatrick, Connections everything in this job market. Kirkpatrick&#8217;s letter was a rebuttal to an earlier June 13 article by Maclean Kay, Rooting for the promised labour shortage. Kay&#8217;s somewhat rambling article eventually focused on a recent prediction about a coming labor shortage, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99,1242,1418],"tags":[6631,2150,16181],"class_list":["post-2923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-just_so","category-victoria","tag-careers","tag-labor","tag-reinvention"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2923"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2936,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2923\/revisions\/2936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}