{"id":2779,"date":"2010-06-05T23:22:55","date_gmt":"2010-06-06T06:22:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=2779"},"modified":"2010-06-05T23:22:56","modified_gmt":"2010-06-06T06:22:56","slug":"gentrification-2-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2010\/06\/05\/gentrification-2-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Gentrification 2.0?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The title of my post is semi-serious, semi-ironic. I&#8217;m ambivalent about gentrification: if it means unslumming, I figure it&#8217;s good; if it means homogenization toward a single class (typically privileged) at the expense of economic diversity, it&#8217;s probably not-so-good, right?<\/p>\n<p>When I write &#8220;Gentrification 2.0,&#8221; I&#8217;m saying that I&#8217;m not sure how this particular example &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Woodward%27s_building\">The Woodward&#8217;s  Project<\/a> in Vancouver &#8211; will play out. It&#8217;s 2.0 insofar as it&#8217;s not unslumming in Jane Jacobs&#8217;s sense, nor is it private market gentrification. It&#8217;s an interesting hybrid.<\/p>\n<p>Canada&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/news.nationalpost.com\/\">National Post<\/a> newspaper has started a series of articles about <a href=\"http:\/\/news.nationalpost.com\/category\/posted\/the-woodward%E2%80%99s-project\/\">the Woodward&#8217;s Project<\/a>. The reporter is <a href=\"http:\/\/news.nationalpost.com\/author\/bhutchinson\/\">Brian Hutchinson<\/a>, who focuses on the neighborhood (Downtown East Side) and the social implications of putting a spiffy mixed-use high-rise development into its center. This is an unusual development, however: it has &#8220;125 fully equipped apartments reserved for low-income singles, and 75 spacious units reserved for families; 80% of the family apartments are rented at below-market rates&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/news.nationalpost.com\/2010\/06\/05\/the-woodwards-project-from-high-above-to-down-below\/\">source<\/a>), while at the same time it also boasts market-rate condos valued at over $1million and provides the better-off residents with rooftop luxuries that afford (to use a word Hutchinson used) &#8220;bacchanalian&#8221; excess.<\/p>\n<p>I <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2010\/03\/12\/vancouver-day-trip\/\">wrote about<\/a> the Woodward&#8217;s Project after taking my daughter to lunch in Vancouver for her birthday. It&#8217;s a fascinating project, and I&#8217;m looking forward to reading the entire series. Hutchinson is &#8220;embedded&#8221; at Woodward&#8217;s for a whole month.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"border: 6px solid white\" title=\"Woodward's Atrium 2\" src=\"http:\/\/lh3.ggpht.com\/_Rg-tSGYurlI\/S5ngKRD4nbI\/AAAAAAAAAu0\/ZIovz0zf8_o\/s512\/CIMG0530.JPG\" alt=\"\" width=\"269\" height=\"358\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The title of my post is semi-serious, semi-ironic. I&#8217;m ambivalent about gentrification: if it means unslumming, I figure it&#8217;s good; if it means homogenization toward a single class (typically privileged) at the expense of economic diversity, it&#8217;s probably not-so-good, right? When I write &#8220;Gentrification 2.0,&#8221; I&#8217;m saying that I&#8217;m not sure how this particular example [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2357,1061,1419,1642,2071,259,1494,2233,1002,1830],"tags":[16014,16015],"class_list":["post-2779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-affordable_housing","category-architecture","category-cities","category-homelessness","category-housing","category-innovation","category-jane_jacobs","category-land_use","category-social_critique","category-vancouver","tag-gentrification","tag-unslumming"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2779"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2786,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2779\/revisions\/2786"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}