{"id":227,"date":"2003-04-22T22:39:55","date_gmt":"2003-04-23T02:39:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2003\/04\/22\/the-bad-feng-shui-of-monumental-clutt"},"modified":"2003-04-22T22:39:55","modified_gmt":"2003-04-23T02:39:55","slug":"the-bad-feng-shui-of-monumental-clutter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2003\/04\/22\/the-bad-feng-shui-of-monumental-clutter\/","title":{"rendered":"The bad feng shui of monumental clutter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a45'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the weirdest thing: images seem to disappear off the web, or perhaps are never posted in the first place.  Yet I do know that there exist pictures &#8212; which I couldn&#8217;t find &#8212; that clinch the argument that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wtv-zone.com\/califPamela\/ww2memorial.html\">Friedrich St. Florian&#8217;s<\/a> design for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cornishproductions.com\/html\/ww2_original_design.html\">World War II Memorial<\/a> on the Mall in Washington DC uncannily resembles <a href=\"http:\/\/forum.fok.nl\/showtopic.php\/269357\/1\/25\">Albert Speer&#8217;s<\/a> proposal for <a href=\"http:\/\/images-eu.amazon.com\/images\/P\/B00007KGAK.03.LZZZZZZZ.jpg\">Germania<\/a>, his World War II era redesign of Berlin.  <\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.savethemall.org\/\">National Coalition to Save Our Mall<\/a> appeared on the scene early, in the Spring of 2000, to attempt to avert the approval of St. Florian&#8217;s proposed design.  Unfortunately, it was approved, but Save Our Mall continues to fight other battles: the mall appears up for grabs, ready to be cluttered up with more and more unnecessary stuff, rather like a shopping mall.  The other day, Judy Scott Feldman of Save Our Mall sent around a link to Christopher Knight&#8217;s LA Times article, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calendarlive.com\/galleriesandmuseums\/knight\/cl-ca-knight20apr20.story\">America&#8217;s Maul<\/a>, which presents a lucid argument for preserving the mall&#8217;s intended meaning.  Read it in its entirety; here is an excerpt:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The openness of the Mall is a central symbolic feature of Pierre Charles L&#8217;Enfant&#8217;s renowned 1791 plan for the new nation&#8217;s seat of government. In fact, disgust with 19th century clutter is responsible for the Mall we see today. After a disfiguring period of rapacious commercial development, the L&#8217;Enfant scheme was revived and modified in 1901 at the direction of a Senate committee, led by Michigan&#8217;s James McMillan. A brilliant team of artists that included landscape architect Frederick Law Olmstead, sculptor Augustus St. Gaudens and architects Charles F. McKim and Daniel H. Burnham devised the McMillan Plan.<br \/>\nTheir inventive ground plan embodies the rational order of Enlightenment thought. Shaped roughly like a kite, its long axis is anchored at one end by the Capitol, seat of the people&#8217;s representative government, and at the other by the Lincoln Memorial, shrine to the unbreakable union of the states. The short axis reaches from the White House, home of the nation&#8217;s civilian leader, to the Jefferson Memorial, which remembers the founding document &#8212; the Declaration of Independence.<br \/>\nNext to the point where the long and short axes cross, the great obelisk of the Washington Monument anchors the design. It&#8217;s the spindle around which the capital city turns. These individual components form a clear network of structures that, taken together, outline the late-18th century principles on which our social contract as a nation was written. The Mall is a physical emblem of democracy, constructed from buildings, memorials and sculptures.<br \/>\nAnd, not least of all, from open landscape. The glue for its five distinct structures is empty space &#8212; an open, unencumbered park. There, the citizenry is invited to gather.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps coincidentally, or perhaps because this sort of thing is on the march, Speer&#8217;s son, Albert Jr., submitted a <a href=\"http:\/\/hnn.us\/comments\/8583.html\">grand design<\/a> to develop China&#8217;s capital <a href=\"http:\/\/clta-gny.org\/speer.htm\">Beijing<\/a> in preparation for the 2008 Olympics.  It&#8217;s a project, however, that begs to be compared to his father&#8217;s plans for Germania.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- *** &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>And on the enviro-front in BC, finally some good news: The Sierra Legal Defense Fund is taking the Canadian federal government to court over the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canada.com\/victoria\/timescolonist\/story.asp?id=66955205-9EF0-4026-AA5C-A044E384CFBC\">disaster<\/a> wreaked on BC native salmon species by <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2003\/04\/14\">fish farms<\/a> in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farmedanddangerous.org\/maps.php\">Broughton Archipelago<\/a>, arguing that the government is breaching its constitutional duty to protect aboriginal fisheries.  I&#8217;m delighted that this issue is going before the courts, since all public protest and scientific evidence hasn&#8217;t brought about much of a change in government and industry promulgation of these harmful policies.  Native Pacific salmon, in BC, is a lynchpin species that connects to the environmental health of an entire ecosystem: ruin the salmon and you ruin First Nations&#8217; way of life along with the food chain upon which bears, wolves (yes, wolves: they fish salmon here), and even birds depend.  Mess up the bears and the wolves and you mess up the deer and the cougar, and so on down the line.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s the weirdest thing: images seem to disappear off the web, or perhaps are never posted in the first place. Yet I do know that there exist pictures &#8212; which I couldn&#8217;t find &#8212; that clinch the argument that Friedrich St. Florian&#8217;s design for the World War II Memorial on the Mall in Washington DC [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[600],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-yulelogstories"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}