{"id":1276,"date":"2009-06-14T12:19:19","date_gmt":"2009-06-14T19:19:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=1276"},"modified":"2009-06-14T12:19:19","modified_gmt":"2009-06-14T19:19:19","slug":"made-me-comment-brendon-wilson-on-canada-and-its-tech-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2009\/06\/14\/made-me-comment-brendon-wilson-on-canada-and-its-tech-future\/","title":{"rendered":"Made me comment: Brendon Wilson on Canada and Its Tech Future"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I came across Brendon J. Wilson&#8217;s excellent blog post, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brendonwilson.com\/blog\/2009\/06\/11\/does-it-matter-if-the-future-isnt-available-in-canada\/\">Does it matter if the future isn&#8217;t available in Canada?<\/a> last week and felt compelled to comment.<\/p>\n<p>Brendon&#8217;s post addresses a response to Macleans Magazine&#8217;s article <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.macleans.ca\/2009\/06\/09\/you-can%E2%80%99t-buy-that-here\/\">You can&#8217;t buy that here<\/a>, which, as he wrote, mirrored concerns he already expressed in a March 2009 post, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brendonwilson.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/30\/borders-keep-out-innovation-too\/\">Borders keep out innovation, too<\/a>. If you&#8217;re Canadian (or maybe thinking of doing business in Canada) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brendonwilson.com\/blog\/2009\/06\/11\/does-it-matter-if-the-future-isnt-available-in-canada\/\">Does it matter if the future isn&#8217;t available in Canada?<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brendonwilson.com\/blog\/2009\/03\/30\/borders-keep-out-innovation-too\/\">Borders keep out innovation, too<\/a> are both excellent must-read pieces.<\/p>\n<p>The Macleans article Brendon references had prompted a defense of the Canadian condition by another writer.  Brendon&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brendonwilson.com\/blog\/2009\/06\/11\/does-it-matter-if-the-future-isnt-available-in-canada\/\">Does it matter if the future isn&#8217;t available in Canada?<\/a> addresses both positions. He ends in favor of Macleans\u2019, however, and writes that its &#8220;attempt to point out how Canada is missing out on the future, however small a piece of it, seems like a valid tactic despite the weakness of its execution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I agree, and also left a long comment on his post. I&#8217;m using my blog to remind me of what I wrote in response (most of which I excerpt, below), but really encourage people to check out Brendon&#8217;s original post(s). My comment (abridged):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I think you get at something very essential with your observations, Brendon, for example when you write about missing \u201cthe experience of using the device in your daily life, of truly understanding the implications, applications, and untapped potential of the device\u201d (and while you were talking about the iPhone in that example, I think the point translates across the technology landscape.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s conditions like the ones that exists around technology and innovation in Canada that make the issue of Canadian culture so difficult, too, because the words \u201cpaternalism\u201d and \u201ctutelage [from authorities on high]\u201d come to mind, not independence, liberation, freedom. And that, too, contributes to the niggling sense of inferiority.<\/p>\n<p>Do you know what the wealthy establishment fathers of Canada told young artists in the Group of Seven (now recognized as the founders of national Canadian landscape painting) back in the early 20th century? \u201cIt\u2019s bad enough having to live in this country. Why bother hanging pictures of it up on one\u2019s walls?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>They preferred to collect Old European Masters instead &#8211; Dutch landscapes in shades of brown with brown cows. Instead of embracing the innovation that the Group of Seven artists offered, they turned to the past and haughtily told those innovators to learn to paint like the *Old* Masters instead. The innovators wanted to look to other innovators in Europe instead &#8211; Cezanne, cubism, futurism, abstraction. But the paternalists knew \u201cbetter\u201d &#8211; and with their \u201cwisdom\u201d helped stunt Canadian culture instead of furthering it. Take a look at the museums built on private collections in the US and you\u2019ll see that contemporary American captains of industry collected European and American avant-gardists, not brown pictures of brown cows. Consequently, American culture benefited from their support, and &#8211; as a spin-off many decades later &#8211; there are now many seminal collections for the public to enjoy. Canadian collections from that period are small miseries in comparison, and viewing them isn\u2019t nearly as satisfying. That\u2019s how a culture of old-fashioned paternalism (with its flip side of \u201cmade in Canada\u201d solutions &#8211; the Group of Seven worked often in isolation) has ripple effects that are felt for generations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I came across Brendon J. Wilson&#8217;s excellent blog post, Does it matter if the future isn&#8217;t available in Canada? last week and felt compelled to comment. Brendon&#8217;s post addresses a response to Macleans Magazine&#8217;s article You can&#8217;t buy that here, which, as he wrote, mirrored concerns he already expressed in a March 2009 post, Borders [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1823,99,1824,358,678,259,1903],"tags":[6192,781,142],"class_list":["post-1276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arts-canada","category-business","category-canada","category-comments","category-ideas","category-innovation","category-writing","tag-brendon_j_wilson","tag-culture","tag-technology"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1276"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1281,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276\/revisions\/1281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}