{"id":1123,"date":"2009-01-12T23:23:44","date_gmt":"2009-01-13T06:23:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=1123"},"modified":"2009-01-12T23:23:44","modified_gmt":"2009-01-13T06:23:44","slug":"notes-mystery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2009\/01\/12\/notes-mystery\/","title":{"rendered":"Notes: Mystery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I was on a sort of nostalgia rag (see my <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2009\/01\/04\/freshness\/#comment-9764\">comments<\/a> to the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2009\/01\/04\/freshness\/\">Freshness<\/a> post, for example), I was reminded of a book by Louise Huebner (go ahead, google her), which I read when I was 14. Her book, while having an eccentric title, was about power and control, a topic of keen interest to any adolescent.<\/p>\n<p>Huebner pithily critiqued people who try to give themselves airs through mysterious behavior. She basically called bullshit on this; her remarks stayed with me from that moment on.<\/p>\n<p>She asked, &#8220;What has being mysterious to do with [control]?&#8221; (And if that&#8217;s not a question every teenager wants resolved, I don&#8217;t know what is. It was certainly of pressing concern to me.)<\/p>\n<p>At this point, Huebner continued with pure gold, or balm: &#8220;I&#8217;ve known a lot of dull and stupid women who were mysterious. They had no control and were accomplishing nothing. They were a mystery to themselves, and this is what they projected.&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/satanicsingles.com\/library\/wicca04.pdf\">Source<\/a>, p.65. Note: it&#8217;s a PDF.)<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the labored effort to come across as a woman-of-mystery essentially covers up a lack of power.<\/p>\n<p>(Aside: as an art historian, I can attest that entire &#8220;movements&#8221; were built around the representation of stupid, powerless women as mysterious <em>femmes fatales<\/em>. The entire <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pre-Raphaelite_Brotherhood\">Pre-Raphaelite<\/a> movement springs to mind, for example. Goo-y <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dante_Gabriel_Rossetti\">Pre-Raphaelitism<\/a> is still a favored trope of adolescents, or those stuck there. Hm, kitsch and powerlessness: perhaps a rewarding subject for another &#8220;notes&#8221; excursion?)<\/p>\n<p>Today, I&#8217;m intrigued by how Huebner&#8217;s comments articulate something salient about blogging and online presence, too. Mystery (wo)men aren&#8217;t nearly as interesting as people who are open and who have actual stories to tell. They have the power, and possibly authenticity, the must-have accessory of the virtual age. (I&#8217;m still stuck in adolescence, of course, trying to figure it all out&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>And privacy? Well, at the least we have to consider that unless you&#8217;re a secret agent working for the CIA or something, mystery is no shield against an invasion of privacy. The open person&#8217;s shield of defense is his or her friends. Why? Because they know who you really are and will vouch for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I was on a sort of nostalgia rag (see my comments to the Freshness post, for example), I was reminded of a book by Louise Huebner (go ahead, google her), which I read when I was 14. Her book, while having an eccentric title, was about power and control, a topic of keen interest [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[630],"class_list":["post-1123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes","tag-mystery"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1123"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}