{"id":1084,"date":"2008-10-27T21:02:18","date_gmt":"2008-10-28T04:02:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/?p=1084"},"modified":"2008-10-27T21:02:18","modified_gmt":"2008-10-28T04:02:18","slug":"what-a-good-online-candidate-matrix-should-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2008\/10\/27\/what-a-good-online-candidate-matrix-should-do\/","title":{"rendered":"What a good online candidate-matrix should do"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I posted the following comment to my <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2008\/10\/25\/whats-wrong-with-victorias-business-community\/\">Oct. 25 vent-a-thon against the Chamber&#8217;s $45-admission mayoral-candidates meeting<\/a>, and realized that it has enough substance to be a blog post:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To the Chamber&#8217;s credit, their <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.victoriachamber.ca\/elections\/municipal\">municipal election site for candidates<\/a> (questions, with candidates posting their answers) is quite good and informative.<\/p>\n<p>It goes some way toward satisfying <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davingreenwell.com\/\">Davin<\/a>&#8216;s request for an online candidate-matrix.<\/p>\n<p>The problem I see with this format is that it&#8217;s difficult to compare candidates &#8212; each one is on a separate page, and voters\/ citizens have to wade through an awful lot of pages, clicking between tabs to get close to comparing candidates&#8217; stances.<\/p>\n<p>It would be cool if users (of the site) had the option to click on a question (eg., &#8220;Do you believe the region has sufficient protective services? Please explain your answer&#8221;) and by doing so call up all the responses to date (some candidates are so unserious that they don&#8217;t bother responding to these surveys at all), with names of candidates appended (which would give users information on who has bothered to respond: another criterium for voters as to whether we should take the candidate seriously).<\/p>\n<p>An additional feature I&#8217;d like is then, as a user of the site, to be able to &#8220;score&#8221; each candidate, so I can keep track of how they do (for me) on each question.<\/p>\n<p>At the end, I could then print out a score card.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Matrix!<\/strong>, dudes and dudettes&#8230; This would be useful &#8212; fun, too.  Might get more people engaged in local politics.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s the first time that &#8220;scoring&#8221; made sense for me in a vivid sort of way.  I can really see the point of a built-in score card functionality now, though.<\/p>\n<p>And like I said, I could see how a scoring functionality could grab voter attention, especially the attention of younger \/ alienated voters.\u00a0 Apply some gaming strategies to the process, get those brain juices revved up.\u00a0 All in a smart, awesome, and kick-ass way, of course&#8230; \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I posted the following comment to my Oct. 25 vent-a-thon against the Chamber&#8217;s $45-admission mayoral-candidates meeting, and realized that it has enough substance to be a blog post: To the Chamber&#8217;s credit, their municipal election site for candidates (questions, with candidates posting their answers) is quite good and informative. It goes some way toward satisfying [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[96,1418],"tags":[3356,3386],"class_list":["post-1084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-victoria","tag-municipal_election_08","tag-scorecard"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1084\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}