{"id":1038,"date":"2008-07-19T05:30:34","date_gmt":"2008-07-19T12:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2008\/07\/19\/diigo-bookmarks-07192008-pm\/"},"modified":"2008-08-22T09:52:27","modified_gmt":"2008-08-22T16:52:27","slug":"diigo-bookmarks-07192008-pm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/2008\/07\/19\/diigo-bookmarks-07192008-pm\/","title":{"rendered":"Diigo Bookmarks 07\/19\/2008 (p.m.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul class=\"diigo-linkroll\">\n<li>\n<p class=\"diigo-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ryanavent.com\/blog\/?p=1252\">The Bellows \u00bb How Good is Houston?<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"diigo-description\">Ryan Avent of &#8220;The Bellows&#8221; critiques Ed Glaeser&#8217;s piece for the New York Sun, which, according to The Bellows, is riddled with errors and is undermined by Glaeser&#8217;s own research.  Glaeser&#8217;s neo-con thesis in the NY Sun article is that Houston is middle-class-friendlier and somehow more affordable due to its libertarian anti-regulationist stance, and that NYC is unaffordable because it&#8217;s regulated to the nines.  It&#8217;s a very familiar argument in some circles, and it&#8217;s interesting to see Ryan take it apart quite deftly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"diigo-tags\">tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/nyc\">nyc<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/edward_glaeser\">edward_glaeser<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/ryan_avent\">ryan_avent<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/urban_development\">urban_development<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/regulation\">regulation<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.diigo.com\/user\/lampertina\/affordability\">affordability<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Bellows \u00bb How Good is Houston? Ryan Avent of &#8220;The Bellows&#8221; critiques Ed Glaeser&#8217;s piece for the New York Sun, which, according to The Bellows, is riddled with errors and is undermined by Glaeser&#8217;s own research. Glaeser&#8217;s neo-con thesis in the NY Sun article is that Houston is middle-class-friendlier and somehow more affordable due [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":311,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[290,2149],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-links","category-urbanism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/yulelog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}