{"id":15,"date":"2008-10-22T17:59:45","date_gmt":"2008-10-22T21:59:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/?p=15"},"modified":"2008-10-22T18:15:50","modified_gmt":"2008-10-22T22:15:50","slug":"proposition-9-what-the-editorial-boards-are-saying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/2008\/10\/22\/proposition-9-what-the-editorial-boards-are-saying\/","title":{"rendered":"Proposition 9: What the editorial boards are saying"},"content":{"rendered":"

Los Angeles Times<\/a>,<\/em> “No on Proposition 9,” September 26, 2008.
\nPasadena Star News<\/a>,<\/em> “Vote ‘no’ on props. 6 and 9,” October 6, 2008.
\nPress Democrat<\/a>, <\/em>“Wrong Way,” September 8, 2008.
\nPress Enterprise<\/a>, <\/em>“No on 9,” September 12, 2008.
\nTracy Press<\/a>,<\/em> “Proposition 9 has victims as a concern, but it would put too much burden on our prison system if it passes,” September 23, 2008.
\nSan Diego Union Tribune<\/a>,<\/em> “No on Prop 9: Measure is poorly drafted and wrongheaded,” September 25, 2008.
\nOrange County Register<\/a>,<\/em> “California Prop. 9 Editorial: Unnecessary tinkering with constitution,” October 2, 2008.
\nSacramento Bee<\/a>,<\/em> “Proposition 9,” October 9, 2008.
\nSan Francisco Chronicle<\/a>,<\/em> “Props. 6 and 9 are budget busters,” October 9, 2008.
\nBakersfield Californian<\/a>,<\/em> “Ballot-box budgeting: Vote NO on Props 6 and 9,” October 9, 2008.
\nLa Opinion<\/a>, <\/em>“Two Measures to Reject,” October 12, 2008.
\nFresno Bee<\/a>,<\/em> “Vote ‘no’ on Proposition 9, an ill-considered crime victims bill,” October 13, 2008.
\nWoodland Daily Democrat<\/a><\/em>, “Voters should turn down Props. 5, 6, and 9,” October 14, 2008.
\nSan Jose Mercury News<\/a>,<\/em> “Editorial: Proposition 9 would increase prison costs; vote no,” October 14, 2008.
\nChico Enterprise-Record<\/a>, <\/em>“Flawed measures should be rejected,” October 16, 2008.
\nStockton Record<\/a>,<\/em> “Proposition 9 – No,” October 16, 2008.
\nNew York Times<\/a>,<\/em> “Fiscal Disaster in California,” October 9, 2008.
\nContra Costa Times<\/a>, <\/em>“Times recommendations on California propositions,” October 19, 2008.
\nSan Gabriel Valley Tribune<\/a>, <\/em>“Propositions in Review,” October 19, 2008.
\nNapa Valley Register<\/a>, <\/em>“Vote No On Proposition 9,” October 16, 2008.
\nSalinas Californian<\/a>,<\/em> “Vote no on state Props. 5, 6 and 9,” October 18, 2008.
\nMonterey County Herald<\/a>,<\/em> “Proposition endorsements,” October 17, 2008.
\nLong Beach Press-Telegram<\/a>,<\/em> “No on Proposition 9,” October 4, 2008.
\nDesert Dispatch<\/a>,<\/em> “Victims’ Rights Yes, Amendment No,” October 8, 2008.
\nThe Vacaville Reporter<\/a>,<\/em> “Vote No on Prop. 9,” October 22, 2008.
\nLos Angeles Daily News<\/a>,<\/em> “No on Props. 5, 6, and 9.
\nSanta Cruz Sentinel<\/a>,<\/em> “As We See It: Vote No on Props. 6 and 9,” October 15, 2008.
\nThe Modesto Bee<\/a>,<\/em> “Prop. 9 is too ambitious,” October 9 2008.<\/p>\n

Newspaper endorsements against Proposition 6, here<\/a>. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Los Angeles Times, “No on Proposition 9,” September 26, 2008. Pasadena Star News, “Vote ‘no’ on props. 6 and 9,” October 6, 2008. Press Democrat, “Wrong Way,” September 8, 2008. Press Enterprise, “No on 9,” September 12, 2008. Tracy Press, “Proposition 9 has victims as a concern, but it would put too much burden on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1956,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1956"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/votenoprops6and9\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}