{"id":37,"date":"2017-11-21T02:34:03","date_gmt":"2017-11-21T02:34:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/?p=37"},"modified":"2017-11-21T02:34:03","modified_gmt":"2017-11-21T02:34:03","slug":"looking-to-the-future-to-solve-problems-of-the-present","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/2017\/11\/21\/looking-to-the-future-to-solve-problems-of-the-present\/","title":{"rendered":"Looking to the Future to Solve Problems of the Present"},"content":{"rendered":"

Looking back at today and the past topics that were presented, it seems that we touched on philosophy a lot more than science or even public policy. \u00a0Until taking this class, I never had been exposed to philosophy or had to think as critically as I had to about the unintended consequences of an action. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Compared to the past discussions, Professor Sweeney\u2019s one takes the cake when it comes to the \u201csomewhat-unsolvable-problems\u201d of the Internet. \u00a0And it is the most frustrating because it is so difficult to come up with any sort of solution that fits every situation. \u00a0There is just so much nuance and unique cases that come with the Internet. \u00a0It is as if that if there was any law that needs to be passed, it would only apply to a super-specific case. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Today\u2019s post will touch base on some more philosophy and some observations and thoughts that I had about the Internet. \u00a0First, we will cover some philosophy about truth on the Internet. \u00a0Finally, we will talk about some observations about the prevalence of technology in our lives and the trends in communication. <\/span><\/p>\n

When Professor Sweeney talked about the fake Facebook ad that Cher is dead, it reminded me of the time when my friends mom announced that Jackie Chan was dead. \u00a0Where she got that information was Facebook, and none of us bothered to check whether or not Jackie Chan really did pass away. \u00a0At the time, I did not really care that he passed, but as I watched more of his movies with my dad and my sisters, I began to feel sad that such a great actor passed away. \u00a0No one would be able to see any of his movies. \u00a0Fortunately, I was wrong because I saw a movie that featured him, and to add on to this, he even visited Saipan one time to check out the newly casino. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Although I\u2019m glad that I was wrong about Jackie Chan being dead, looking back I am not happy about the fact that I was deceived and did not bother to corroborate information that I heard from someone else who heard it from Facebook. \u00a0My friend\u2019s mom did not mean any harm, but we were all victims of misinformation. \u00a0However, it did not matter whether or not we learned the truth later on. \u00a0What mattered was the fact that a lie could have the power to make us reconsider the truth. \u00a0Corroboration of sources helps us purge doubt about the truth of a statement, but the Internet cannot really help us with the corroboration because it could return more information that support the lie. \u00a0The Internet is a place where we have access to information, but as far as we know, there is no tool that can fact-check every piece of information that goes online. \u00a0We can propose AI or machine learning, but what would be their standards, and who get to decide what standards are being programmed? \u00a0It is not an easy question to answer or a straightforward problem to solve, but it is better to create some sort of solution that attempts to reduce the risk of fake news rather than do nothing about it, and I think that AI could help us with that. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Expanding on the idea about how technology could help us determine the truth, technology has been ever present in our lives. \u00a0Although it is quite obvious, it is quite frightening to see how integrated in our lives it has been. \u00a0I grew up without much technology or an Internet connection, but now, if I do not have Wifi, it feels as if the electricity has gone out. \u00a0It is so weird and scary to have that feeling. \u00a0And this is not limited to me. \u00a0There are many others who feel as if an Internet connection is one of the most fundamental needs of humans. \u00a0And the rate at which people are using technology is not changing within generations, but rather siblings. \u00a0My first two younger sisters and I, who were born around the turn of the 21st century, grew up with the idea that screen time could be limited, but my youngest sister, who was born in 2011, lived in a time where everyone had access to a screen. \u00a0I\u2019m glad that my mom limits my baby sister\u2019s screen time not because I am jealous of her, but because she is trying to make her remember that there is a real world out there. \u00a0This problem would only get worse as technology evolves, and technology is not evolving linearly, but rather exponentially. \u00a0The generation before me know of a time when there was no Internet. \u00a0My generation was born at the turning point of the Internet. \u00a0My baby sister was born into the Internet. \u00a0This difference is going to create a really interesting dynamic between generations\/siblings as technology progresses.<\/span><\/p>\n

Touching on the last point, I would like to circle back to the later part of the first point I made. \u00a0The Internet is basically a tool that helps us obtain information, whether it is in the form of an article, a YouTube video, or a Snapchat post. \u00a0This is not the first time that a tool has revolutionized the way we obtained information. \u00a0First it was the development of human language. \u00a0Next it was writing. \u00a0Then it was the printing press, then the telegraph, then the telephone, then radio, then television, and then the Internet. \u00a0I might have missed other technologies, but what I want to point out is the rate that these technologies appeared. \u00a0Majority of them were developed within 200 years past of today, which is not a every long time considering the timeline of humanity. \u00a0Our access to information has been exponential. \u00a0However, what is also interesting to point out is the speed that we receive this information. \u00a0It too is exponential. \u00a0Writing takes time to disperse, and television and radio are not widely accessible as a smartphone with an Internet connection. \u00a0It appears that the faster we obtain information, the more radical changes are appearing in society. \u00a0And further tying this to the first point, the easier it is to spread doubt about the truth. \u00a0Writing has the risk of preserving lies. \u00a0TV and radio are ways to spread those lies quickly. \u00a0The Internet combines the worst of both words. \u00a0Access to information may have brought us to where we are in the technology tree, but it does not appear that our biology and psychology can handle this much information. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There is no clear-cut solution to any of this, and these problems are only going to get bigger and much worse. \u00a0However, what Dean Smith said about looking to the future for solutions to the present appears to be the best way to solve these issues. \u00a0We cannot look back into the past because the past has never experienced a problem at this scale. \u00a0Looking ahead would be the best solution because by predicting unintended consequences early on, we have the ability to minimize that damage that it could cause. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Looking back at today and the past topics that were presented, it seems that we touched on philosophy a lot more than science or even public policy. \u00a0Until taking this class, I never had been exposed to philosophy or had to think as critically as I had to about the unintended consequences of an action. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8865,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8865"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37\/revisions\/38"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}