{"id":25,"date":"2017-10-24T02:32:05","date_gmt":"2017-10-24T02:32:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/?p=25"},"modified":"2017-10-24T02:32:05","modified_gmt":"2017-10-24T02:32:05","slug":"between-xanadu-and-1984","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/2017\/10\/24\/between-xanadu-and-1984\/","title":{"rendered":"Between Xanadu and 1984"},"content":{"rendered":"

To be honest, I did not expect to be so engaged by the topic of Digital Citizenship. \u00a0By just reading the sources given to us, it appeared that there was not too much to talk about how the Internet will affect the government. \u00a0On the surface, it appeared to be optimizing things left and right, but after having this session with Professor Eaves, my views of the Internet started to change to be less optimistic and hopeful about it.<\/span><\/p>\n

The one analogy that I cannot forget from this discussion was the one Professor Eaves made about how the printing press and the Internet are very similar in their effects. \u00a0Both made access to information easier, which in turn, has caused revolutions from the national-level to the individual level. \u00a0The effect on individuals is quite clear: increased access to information has broadened our knowledge of the world, enabled us to dig into the diverse past, and peer into what the future can potentially be. \u00a0It is really empowering for individuals, but according to Professor Eaves, not as empowering as it was for governments. \u00a0He gave the example of Napoleon and how without the printing press, would have not been able to organize an army of a million to invade Russia. \u00a0The printing press enabled standardization to occur, which in turn helped created nationalism. \u00a0A common identity, history, and language is shared easily because of this invention, and it is this unity that enables governments to become stronger. \u00a0Professor Eaves argues that we are now in the age where the Internet is going to help the state, which might not be as sunshine and daisies was we expect. <\/span><\/p>\n

Let us look at the Snowden leaks, which frankly deserves its own chapter in human history. \u00a0Snowden exposed to the world that a government has the capability of spying upon its own people. \u00a0He believes that although they might use it for the sake of national security, the fact that they have this ability to invade the privacy of millions is something that we should have a conversation about. This level of surveillance could have not happened if it was not for the rise of the Internet. \u00a0From this, one could see that we are at the point in time that the government has the potential to radically change the way it rules over the people. \u00a0Dystopias where government surveillance is omnipresent, such as that of <\/span>1984<\/span><\/i>, is now possible in the foreseeable future. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

However, the caveat is how fast can a government adapt to this change. \u00a0Just as Jeff Bezos has said to HBS, large, established organizations have a hard time changing itself. \u00a0Physical retail stores never caught up to using the Internet the way Amazon has because they did not catch on quickly enough. \u00a0Usually, I facepalm at the thought of slow progress, whether it is in business or government, but this is the time where I start to think that a slow government is something worthwhile to have. \u00a0It gives us time to think and to come up with a solution to the problems that could arise. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Before I end, I want to cover two more things, identity and the law, both of which are at stake when it comes to the rise of Digital citizenship. \u00a0Governments want to keep track of who is a citizen of their country, both for good purposes and not-so-seemingly good purposes. \u00a0For example, they want to know who will pay taxes or who receives welfare, which is good for the people, but they also want to know what are we searching or looking at online for the sake of \u201cnational security,\u201d which is not so good. \u00a0Digital citizenship can pave the way for instantaneous passport renewal, but it can also pave the way for increased surveillance. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Before leaving, I asked Professor Eaves what would be a potential solution to the possibility of <\/span>1984 <\/span><\/i>happening, and his answer was surprising. \u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s the law, not technology, that would protect us.\u201d \u00a0Being a technophile, I find this disappointing, but thinking about it, it really is the law that would enable us to live in a world with an uncorrupt, efficient government that does not trample upon our privacy. \u00a0Laws enable us to take the nuanced choice rather than a binary one. \u00a0One might be worried that governments are the ones who make the laws and are in control, but if you live in a democracy, laws are made for the people and by the people. \u00a0Laws might appear to chain us from progress, but they could be what prevents us from jumping into an abyss. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Sometimes we think that outcomes are black and white, but we forget about the shades of grey that occur in between. \u00a0Almost nothing in this world is binary, and that is what makes the Internet both beautiful and complex. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To be honest, I did not expect to be so engaged by the topic of Digital Citizenship. \u00a0By just reading the sources given to us, it appeared that there was not too much to talk about how the Internet will affect the government. \u00a0On the surface, it appeared to be optimizing things left and right, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8865,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8865"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions\/26"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/thinker670\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}