{"id":4,"date":"2008-10-29T12:49:41","date_gmt":"2008-10-29T16:49:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/?p=4"},"modified":"2008-10-29T12:49:41","modified_gmt":"2008-10-29T16:49:41","slug":"handheld-fingerprint-readers-and-the-british-surveillance-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/2008\/10\/29\/handheld-fingerprint-readers-and-the-british-surveillance-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Handheld fingerprint readers and the British surveillance state"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hundreds of years ago, with the passage of the Magna Carta, Great Britain took a bold step in outlining basic civil liberties for the common man. Unfortunately, over the past few years, the UK has switched from being a basic rights trend-setter, to a surveillance innovator. What ever happened?<\/p>\n<p>Last year, a troubling new law came into effect which makes it a criminal offense to refuse to hand over one&#8217;s encryption key to law\u00a0 enforcement engaged in a &#8216;legitimate&#8217; investigation. This was tested out in court a couple weeks ago, and unfortunately, the right to privacy lost. As <a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/news.ars\/post\/20081020-your-privacy-is-an-illusion-uk-attacks-civil-liberties.html\">Ars Technica described<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Court stated that although there was a right to not self-incriminate, this was not absolute, and that the &#8220;public interest&#8221; can supersede this right in some circumstances.fd<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Just last week, the British government <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nowpublic.com\/tech-biz\/passports-will-be-needed-buy-mobile-phones-uk\">floated a proposal<\/a> to require that a passport be shown in order to purchase a mobile phone or SIM card. After all, whats the point in spending all that money <a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/news.ars\/post\/20080522-uk-to-streamline-identity-fraud-with-data-retention-proposal.html\">recording calls<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/8301-13739_3-10030134-46.html\">real-time location information<\/a> if you can&#8217;t be sure who is speaking on the other end of the line.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the latest nail in the privacy coffin has been announced: Starting in 2009, British police will be issued <a href=\"http:\/\/www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk\/news\/local-national\/handheld-fingerprint-scanners-to-be-used-in-uk-from-2009-14017418.html\">hand-held fingerprint readers<\/a>, connected to a central server via a wireless\/cellular connection. Given the existing (and troubling) powers that police have to arbitrarily <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2008\/feb2008\/poli-f13.shtml\">stop and question people in the street<\/a> due to &#8220;terrorism&#8221; concerns, this&#8217;ll allow them to immediately determine someone&#8217;s identity on the spot, with or without a national ID card.<\/p>\n<p>Thankfully, it isn&#8217;t yet a crime to not have working fingerprints. Thus, it&#8217;s quite quite easy to imagine the privacy-aware crowd turning to acid, glue or other techniques to erase the ridges and swirls from their own fingertips.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hundreds of years ago, with the passage of the Magna Carta, Great Britain took a bold step in outlining basic civil liberties for the common man. Unfortunately, over the past few years, the UK has switched from being a basic rights trend-setter, to a surveillance innovator. What ever happened? Last year, a troubling new law [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1961,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3407,279,3408],"class_list":["post-4","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-fingerprints","tag-privacy","tag-surveillance-state"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1961"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/surveillance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}