{"id":18,"date":"2003-08-19T22:21:06","date_gmt":"2003-08-20T02:21:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/stepno\/when-is-blogging-for-the-record\/"},"modified":"2007-03-30T09:48:32","modified_gmt":"2007-03-30T13:48:32","slug":"when-is-blogging-for-the-record","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/when-is-blogging-for-the-record\/","title":{"rendered":"When is blogging &#8216;for the record&#8217;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Do you fix old blog entries?<\/p>\n<p>Can readers tell?<\/p>\n<p>I notice that my weblog editing programs, Radio and Manila, maintain an item&#8217;s original post date and time, even if I modify it a day or two later &#8212; as I&#8217;ve done a couple of times with the items on this page. At least that&#8217;s the case with the programs&#8217; default templates and settings.<\/p>\n<p>I doubt that I have enough of a readership to notice when I update something&#8230; However, the general issue has me curious:<\/p>\n<p>When and why do people go back and edit blog entries?<\/p>\n<ul><a name=\"a17\"><\/a><\/p>\n<li><a name=\"a17\"><\/a>Do you update things by adding a comment or a whole new page?<\/li>\n<p><a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a><\/p>\n<li><a name=\"a17\"><\/a>Do you correct errors, add details or make changes when you think of a way to say something more elegantly?<\/li>\n<p><a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a><\/p>\n<li><a name=\"a17\"><\/a>If you do, do you note or  date the change?<\/li>\n<p><a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a><\/p>\n<li><a name=\"a17\"><\/a>Do you add a comment or link to a fixed version?<\/li>\n<p><a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a> <a name=\"a17\"><\/a><\/p>\n<li><a name=\"a17\"><\/a>Or do you have a whole &#8220;corrections&#8221; section, like some newspapers? (Examples: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/corrections\/\">The Guardian<\/a><span style=\"font-style: italic\">, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/nytimes.com\/corrections.html\">The New York Times<\/a>.)<\/li>\n<li>Do you document your own update policy anywhere?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The question isn&#8217;t very significant for a casual blog, but imagine a candidate saying &#8220;If you want to know my stand on abortion, look what I said in my blog last March&#8230;&#8221; Readers would not be able to tell whether the original document had been modified.<\/p>\n<p>(Of course, they could also check the archives of the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Times<\/span> and <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Washington Post<\/span>&#8230; On a major issue those &#8220;newspapers of record&#8221; would have information &#8212; and their reporters certainly would raise a red flag if a candidate was engaging in Stalinist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newseum.org\/berlinwall\/commissar_vanishes\/vanishes.htm\">revisionism<\/a> online.)<\/p>\n<p>Minor case in point&#8230; I&#8217;m typing this in a rush, but I may come back later and link it to some sample corrections pages or other resources. I&#8217;ve done that once already&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>It got a bit longer, so I wrote a short summary, changed the headline and made the longer version this linked story-page. Tomorrow I could decide it was all a dumb idea and erase the whole thing. Or I might just replace it with a link) if I discover that someone else has already written a master&#8217;s thesis, Poynter essay or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ojr.org\/ojr\/glaser\/1061336081.php\">Online Journalism Review article<\/a> on a closely-related subject.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the reference to OJR as a possible source was in my first draft, but the link wasn&#8217;t&#8230; a day later I discovered the actual Mark Glaser article. A week later, I noticed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bostonphoenix.com\/medialog\/index.asp\">Dan Kennedy, Boston Phoenix columnist<\/a>, handling a correction in an Aug. 17 story by presenting both a new Aug. 21 item and a &#8220;Note: This item was later corrected&#8221; entry, with link, on the old version. And then I stumbled on Adrian Holovaty&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/holovaty.com\/blog\/archive\/2003\/08\/21\/0137\">blog transcript<\/a> of Glaser&#8217;s interview with him for the OJR article.<\/p>\n<p>(For the record, I also came back  to this page August 27 to do some editing, add links and bullets.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Do you fix old blog entries? Can readers tell? I notice that my weblog editing programs, Radio and Manila, maintain an item&#8217;s original post date and time, even if I modify it a day or two later &#8212; as I&#8217;ve done a couple of times with the items on this page. At least that&#8217;s the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1089,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-18","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1089"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/stepno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}