{"id":160,"date":"2021-03-13T03:09:59","date_gmt":"2021-03-13T03:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/?p=160"},"modified":"2021-03-13T03:09:59","modified_gmt":"2021-03-13T03:09:59","slug":"reality-check-how-friendships-draw-us-to-reality-tv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/2021\/03\/13\/reality-check-how-friendships-draw-us-to-reality-tv\/","title":{"rendered":"Reality Check: How friendships draw us to reality TV"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The reality-competition game show Survivor is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year, with 40 seasons aired since the American show started in 2000. The Survivor franchise has become almost cult-like: with around 7 million viewers, it continues to be one of CBS\u2019s most popular shows (TV Series Finale). But what makes this show so captivating? Why are we as humans drawn to reality television so much? Well, there\u2019s a lot there\u2014 so buckle in and stay tuned for our take on it!\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/media.giphy.com\/media\/lTGOPHlq1oRySRRvop\/giphy.gif\" width=\"450\" height=\"295\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you haven\u2019t watched Survivor, one, you should (I\u2019ve been binging it all semester) and two, I\u2019ll break down the format for you. Basically, a group of strangers are marooned together in an isolated location competing to be the sole-survivor and winner of one million dollars. The group competes in physical challenges that earn them benefits; safety, resources, and special prizes. Here\u2019s the catch; every few days, one member is voted out of the tribe by the others. So beyond the physical challenges and surviving in the wild, this game show has a huge psychological component. Forming friendships, allies, and trust is integral to making it through the show for the chance to win $1,000,000.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Watching along from my couch at home, it is impossible not to think about the social dynamics within the show&#8211; especially this week as we learn about friendship and acquaintances. Along with fulfilling their basic need to survive like finding food and water, contestants must also form social connections and bonds in order to stay in the game. This mirrors our backbone Baumeister &amp; Leary paper&#8211; that social connections are a <\/span><b>fundamental human need<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (1995). In order to win, contestants <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">must<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> form connections.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Forming and maintaining friendships are the only way to stay and get to the end of the show&#8211; so how do contestants form these bonds and know who to trust? We learned this week that friendships form based on proximity and chance which can be directly seen in the show (Back, Schmukle &amp; Egloff, 2008). At the start, contestants are randomly split into two tribes and when they connect back together further on in the season, alliances are almost always along original tribe lines.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Maintaining these friendships and allies on Survivor are mostly based on trust&#8211; and the willingness to reciprocate that trust to prove your alliance. As we see in the study by Lount mentioned in the lecturette, \u201ctrusting another person requires a willingness to be vulnerable in potentially costly interactions, with the hope that one\u2019s partner will act with positive intentions\u201d (2010). This is continuously seen as the contestants build allies and friends&#8211; by putting their trust in others and being vulnerable in the hopes their partner will stay true and not vote them off the island, they build a reciprocal relationship.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">However, this trust gets broken throughout the 40 seasons over and over by the players. It has been shown that humans will compromise their values when there is a monetary reward present&#8211; and with $1,000,000 on the line, people are more willing to cheat, lie, and play the game to stay ahead (M\u00e9t\u00e9reau et al. 2019). That\u2019s a whole other blog post though\u2026\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When I watch Survivor, I always ask myself, \u201cWhat would I do if I were on this show in this situation?\u201d We are entertained by shows like this because we can in some part experience and feel joy from these relationships without having the negative consequences of actually being in them.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">However, the use of friendships for entertainment is not at all exclusive to Survivor. One could make a strong case that friendships are part of what draws us to the realm of reality television in the first place. Reality television combines the human love for stories with our craving for relationships, friendships, and of course, the ~juicy drama~ that comes with it. Without actually experiencing the drama firsthand, we are able to invest ourselves emotionally into the characters\u2019 lives and friendships through the plot.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cMuch narrative entertainment is about characters and social interactions\u2026People who love exploring relationships and friendships might like shows that emphasize the \u2018unscripted\u2019 social interactions and small scale personal dramas, such as soap operas or reality TV,\u201d explains Brendan Rooney, an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University College Dublin who researches the emotional and cognitive engagement with entertainment (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rte.ie\/author\/1060099-aoife-ryan-christensen\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ryan-Christensen<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, 2020). When thinking about what makes \u201creality TV\u201d what it is, the storytelling mechanisms and \u201creal-life\u201d editing it uses makes perfect sense why we are attracted to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Assuming we watch these shows with a big \u201creality check\u201d knowing they are warped, the exploration of reality TV relationships and the scenarios they endure becomes, in some ways, \u201cpractice\u201d for our friendships in actual reality. Although the interactions are fabricated from our perspective, the ability to \u201cexperience\u201d these low-cost friendships through reality TV reflects research that suggests there are rewards in \u201cweak tie\u201d and \u201clow-stakes\u201d friendships. Entertainment \u201cfriendships\u201d are likely not a substitute for true acquaintances, but they may be a complement; maybe there exists a connection between the enjoyment we feel when watching these shows and the higher positivity ratings of more \u201cweak tie\u201d interactions in experiments such as Epley &amp; Schroeder (2014). Sandstrom &amp; Dunn (2014) also note higher happiness ratings associated with the number of weak tie interactions an individual makes in a given day relative to their average (Sandstrom, G. M., &amp; Dunn, E. W., 2014). If watching reality TV allows us to, in some ways, \u201csimulate\u201d these interactions, could this also be an explanation for why we choose to binge watch these series?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A large shortcoming of this hypothesis is that reality TV interactions are not necessarily \u201cinteractions\u201d in the sense that there is communication between two individuals. The benefits discussed by Volpe (2019) emphasize the potential for developing social networks among acquaintances and low-cost friends. Volpe\u2019s argument also uses conversation as an almost necessary cause. The experiments conducted by Epley &amp; Schroeder (2014) and Sandstrom &amp; Dunn (2014) observe humans interacting with other humans. Of course, watching a reality TV show does not allow the viewer to hold a conversation with or introduce themselves to the character. In this respect, it brings to question whether or not the interaction has to be two-sided in order to reap certain benefits of \u201cexperiencing\u201d friendships.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nonetheless, reality TV still stands as a great manifestation of the fundamental need to belong within the entertainment industry. By making it an integral component of success within the game, Survivor quite literally places the need to belong with other fundamental needs of food, water, and shelter. The examples don\u2019t stop here; from The Kardashians to The Bachelor (but more on where romance fits into all of this next week), we are drawn to the experience of friendships through reality TV\u2019s storytelling mechanism. Although it may not directly fulfill our need to belong, it is clear that reality TV provides practice in friendships that is both applicable to real life and fun to watch.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Tess + Kara<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><strong>Works Cited:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Baumeister, Roy F.,Leary, Mark R. The Need to Belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Psychological Bulletin, Vol 117(3), May 1995, 497-529. https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/buy\/1995-29052-001<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;font-size: 10pt\">Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B. Becoming friends by chance. Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):439-40. doi: 10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2008.02106.x. PMID: 18466403.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">CBS 2019-20 Season Ratings. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">TV Series Finale<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. October 29, 2020. https:\/\/tvseriesfinale.com\/tv-show\/cbs-2019-20-season-ratings\/\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Epley, N., &amp; Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(5), 1980\u20131999. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/a0037323\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0037323<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lount, R. B., Jr. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(3), 420\u2013433. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/a0017344\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0017344<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Qu, C., M\u00e9t\u00e9reau, E., Butera, L., Villeval, M. C., &amp; Dreher, J. C. (2019). Neurocomputational Mechanisms at Play when Weighing Concerns for Extrinsic Rewards, Moral Values, and Social Image. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">PLOS Biology<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">17<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(6), [e3000283]. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000283\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000283<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rte.ie\/author\/1060099-aoife-ryan-christensen\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ryan-Christensen<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rte.ie\/author\/1060099-aoife-ryan-christensen\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aoife<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (January 2020). What\u2019s the psychology behind our obsession with reality TV? RT\u00c9.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canvas.harvard.edu\/courses\/85306\/files\/11877440?wrap=1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sandstrom, G. M., &amp; Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(7), 910-922.<\/span><\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/05\/06\/smarter-living\/why-you-need-a-network-of-low-stakes-casual-friendships.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Volpe, A. (May 2019). <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why you need a network of low-stakes casual friendships.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> New York Times<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The reality-competition game show Survivor is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year, with 40 seasons aired since the American show started in 2000. The Survivor franchise has become almost cult-like: with around 7 million viewers, it continues to be one of CBS\u2019s most popular shows (TV Series Finale). But what makes this show so captivating? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9938,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9938"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":161,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions\/161"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/socialconnection\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}