{"id":2539,"date":"2010-08-20T10:27:08","date_gmt":"2010-08-20T14:27:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/snarl\/?p=2539"},"modified":"2010-08-20T10:27:08","modified_gmt":"2010-08-20T14:27:08","slug":"why-dont-they-just-listen-to-me","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/2010\/08\/20\/why-dont-they-just-listen-to-me\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Don&#8217;t They Just Listen to Me?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I received something in the mail from Harvard&#8217;s flexible splending plan administrator describing some changes that will take effect next year. Primarily, over-the-counter medications (such as aspirin, cough medicine, and allergy-relief pills) will no longer be covered as a result of the health care overhaul implemented by, as FoxNews would say, &#8220;the democrats.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, my understanding of this program was that it was supposed to improve (or provide) coverage for many who are not covered adequately, but I didn&#8217;t realize it was supposed to take away coverage from those already PAYING for their health plans through payroll deductions. Still, I can accept that. I mean, the way\u00a0flexible spending\u00a0works is that you have money withdrawn from your paycheck each payperiod and you can use that money pre-tax to purchase your over-the-counter medications. That&#8217;s like a 30% discount. And considering 30% off a $3.00 bottle of generic aspirin is only 90 cents&#8230;I am willing to let the government keep that little bit of savings to help those in need.<\/p>\n<p>But then I read further into the document and it said that Band-Aids and saline solution will continue to be covered. Huh? Why do they need to complicate things? Why can&#8217;t they just say &#8220;No over-the-counter&#8221; drugs are included. Whenever they allow exceptions like this\u00a0it just leads to confusion. And why such random exceptions like Band-Aids and saline solution?\u00a0 Exclude all or nothing. No inbetweens, please.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s just like taxes. I have no problem paying taxes. Generally speaking, I think we&#8217;re undertaxed and with proper taxes (and a necessary reduction in state and federal employees), we wouldn&#8217;t be having so many issues with failing infrastructure (come on&#8230;3 bridges in Massachusetts crumbling just this past week alone? an under-funded\u00a0public transit system in the red every single year?).<\/p>\n<p>So why in the hell can&#8217;t we just have a flat income\u00a0tax? I&#8217;ve read reports that over 50% of the population doesn&#8217;t pay any tax at all because they make less than the allowable thershold. That means less than half of the country is paying for entire country&#8217;s upkeep. That&#8217;s just wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of all these insane tax credits and tricks that benefit some and not others (homeowners can claim mortgage interest in their taxes while renters can&#8217;t claim their rent), people receive tax credits for having kids while they should be paying MORE since they&#8217;re using more\u00a0of the programs), people stop contributing to social security after they reach a certain threshold (somewhere around $100,000) meanshile social security is in such dire straits everbody should continue contributing to it? That money would do a lot of good.<\/p>\n<p>Long story short&#8230;.I say charge everybody\u00a0the same flat tax rate for all income: salary, investments, capital gains. The tax forms would be a helluva lot easier to read. And either allow ALL over-the-counter drugs to be approved for flexible, or none at all.<\/p>\n<p>Why do we insist on complicating things that just don&#8217;t have to be?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I received something in the mail from Harvard&#8217;s flexible splending plan administrator describing some changes that will take effect next year. Primarily, over-the-counter medications (such as aspirin, cough medicine, and allergy-relief pills) will no longer be covered as a result of the health care overhaul implemented by, as FoxNews would say, &#8220;the democrats.&#8221; Now, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":74,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2539"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2540,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2539\/revisions\/2540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/snarl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}