{"id":640,"date":"2004-08-14T23:47:04","date_gmt":"2004-08-15T03:47:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/metasj\/2004\/08\/14\/the-seamy-underbelly-of-reviewing\/"},"modified":"2004-08-14T23:47:04","modified_gmt":"2004-08-15T03:47:04","slug":"the-seamy-underbelly-of-reviewing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/2004\/08\/14\/the-seamy-underbelly-of-reviewing\/","title":{"rendered":"The seamy underbelly of reviewing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a497'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered whether and how large companies coordinated touting for their products in online fora.  I remember fake Amazon book reviews going back to 1998; even today, most books get so few reviews that it pays to throw in a few fake reviews from friends of the author.<\/p>\n<p>For years, it seemed as though only <b>individuals<\/b> bothered to do this &#8212; again, see the small number of reviews for most products.  But they&#8217;re wising up; just today I ran across someone who is clearly now a professional &#8220;Yahoo movies&#8221; reviewer, trained in the ways of Writing Like an Enthusiastic Average Joe, Proper Mispellign, and Mimcking a Hard-core Fan. His <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.yahoo.com\/profiles\/kuzeh2\">Yahoo user profile<\/a> lists just three reviews, two of them terrible, but I&#8217;d guess that this person has a hundred accounts just like it&#8230; and I wonder what a review like his Alien v. Predator review is worth.  <\/p>\n<p>It reads like a film-industry pro who&#8217;s had just enough training not to give it away &#8212; mentions &#8220;the Novel&#8221;, the director, and the movie names by abbreviations that few fans use, but that someone who uses the term hundreds of times a week might.  And, hmm,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nI strongly believe that there will be an extended version on DVD<br \/>\nbut that&#8217;s just a thought of mine, so don&#8217;t take it as a fact.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>by the same articulate guy who then closes with<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMy Final thought!<br \/>\nI&#8217;M GONNA WATCH THIS BABY 5 MORE TIMES!!\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And the film he&#8217;s writing about?  Right, <i>Alien v. Predator<\/i>.  About which real reviewers tend to say things like &#8220;you can just burn a ten dollar bill and get more enjoyment out of that then sitting through this horrible movie.&#8221; (damianisnice)<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s not the only toadie out there.  And there must be lots of reasons to be a toad other than being paid for it.  But Damian makes the good point that anyone who gives AvP high marks is likely associated with the film somehow, and there are a *lot* of A reviews for this one; check out <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.yahoo.com\/mvc\/drv?mid=1808496111&amp;s=&amp;st=10&amp;tot=1619&amp;ys=QnbNvhsDeqhudOW_PVJ0pw--\">the list<\/a> and you&#8217;ll find some reviewers with&#8230; unusual histories.  Some traits shared by the best of them:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li> no personal information; only a few sporadic reviews; could be one of a long list of dummy accounts&#8230; OR <i>lots<\/i> of detailed personal information, w\/conflicting information coming out in individual reviews to make the reviewer fit more squarely into the target audience (See chickmagnet, below);<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>\nFor instance, <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.yahoo.com\/profiles\/chickmagnet262000\">chickmagnet<\/a>, whose profile says hes &#8220;19&#8221; and heading into the Air Force, but who claims to be 15 when reviewing <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.yahoo.com\/mvc\/dfurv?mid=1807768423&amp;iid=255-1360174&amp;s=rc_d&amp;rvid=255-128431&amp;i=48&amp;ys=V5zsL6ITPq_qQzZ3GYte3g--\">SpongeBob Squarepants<\/a>.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<li> lots of A+\/F movie reviews the day\/weekend a movie is released (don&#8217;t forget that an F review for the other movies in your space is almost as good as an A review for your own)\n<li> PR speak in the middle of a rambling, misspelled teenage post.<br \/>\n<blockquote><p>this battle between the Queen and the Predator and scientist is much more fast-paced, suspensful and action-packed, that is actually the way the whole movie was compared to other Alien and Predator films, more fast-paced, slightly more suspenseful, and much more action. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<li> Combine detailed knowledge about backstage details (never EVER misspell the director&#8217;s name) with atrocious orthography.<br \/>\n<blockquote><p><i>The way Paul W. Anderson created the story was just fenominle.<\/i> (<a href=\"http:\/\/movies.yahoo.com\/mvc\/dfurv?mid=1808496111&amp;iid=255-604739&amp;s=rc_d&amp;rvid=255-281377&amp;i=0&amp;ys=CF25n9XaUSxEwo1OFnYhig--\">bushead<\/a>)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<li>Don&#8217;t forget to hype the DVD.  &#8220;I can&#8217;t wait for the DVD!&#8221;,  &#8220;I hear there&#8217;s going to be a director&#8217;s cut DVD, that would be so cool&#8221;, etc.\n<li>Don&#8217;t forget the hype, period.  &#8220;This was, without a doubt, one of the best movies I have ever seen.&#8221;  &#8220;i don&#8217;t care what others say it the best movie i&#8217;ve ever seen!&#8221;\n<li>Compare favorably with a recent major success (&#8220;I, Robot&#8221; seems to be the fave here)\n<\/ol>\n<p>Perhaps the most interesting upside of this look at the AvP reviews, is what it suggests about other recently-touted films &#8212; Fahrenheit 9\/11, Punisher, and Spiderman 2 tended to get similar boosts&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered whether and how large companies coordinated touting for their products in online fora. I remember fake Amazon book reviews going back to 1998; even today, most books get so few reviews that it pays to throw in a few fake reviews from friends of the author. For years, it seemed as though [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":135,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[212],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-null"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7iVvB-ak","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/135"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/640\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}