{"id":154,"date":"2010-04-25T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2010-04-25T03:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shortword\/2010\/04\/25\/the-death-of-scripture-and-the-rise-of-biblical-studies\/"},"modified":"2010-04-25T15:41:03","modified_gmt":"2010-04-25T06:41:03","slug":"the-death-of-scripture-and-the-rise-of-biblical-studies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/2010\/04\/25\/the-death-of-scripture-and-the-rise-of-biblical-studies\/","title":{"rendered":"The Death of Scripture and the Rise of Biblical Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>This book offers a new account of the origins of biblical studies, illuminating the relation of the Bible to churchly readers, theological interpreters, academic critics, and people in between. It explains why, in an age of religious resurgence, modern biblical criticism may no longer be in a position to serve as the Bible&#8217;s disciplinary gatekeeper.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is how Oxford University Press describes <em>The Death of Scripture and the Rise of Biblical Studies<\/em> by Michael Legaspi (Assistant Professor of Theology at Creighton University). You can find the publisher\u2019s full description of the book, as well as brief reviews by Gary Anderson (Notre Dame), Walter Moberly (Durham), and Jon D. Levenson (Harvard), at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oup.com\/us\/catalog\/general\/subject\/ReligionTheology\/BiblicalStudies\/?view=usa&amp;ci=9780195394351\">OUP\u2019s website<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>I predict that Michael Legaspi\u2019s book will quickly rise to the top of \u201cmust read\u201d lists for people who have academic interests in the Bible. But I think it will also be highly relevant for anyone else who wonders about the many ways people approach the Bible in modern times (and postmodern times, if you like). I make these predictions not only based on the impressive endorsements Legaspi&#8217;s book is already receiving, but also based on discussions with, and presentations by, the author about parts of the book. <\/p>\n<p>And that&#8217;s why I strongly recommend this book. I\u2019m about to place my own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0195394356?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=shogrenot-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0195394356\">order here<\/a> (my Amazon link).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shortword\/files\/2010\/04\/Lowth-cover.y1jQJ2VyjizP.jpg\" alt=\"Lowth-cover.y1jQJ2VyjizP.jpg\" width=\"347\" height=\"567\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Johann David Michaelis\u2019s Latin edition of Robert Lowth\u2019s <em>Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews<\/em> (<em>De sacra poesi Hebraeorum praelectiones<\/em>; 1758, 1761). Among other discussions, Legaspi explains how this publication played an important role in scholars\u2019 reconceiving \u201cdivinely inspired Scripture\u201d as sublime literature that should be approached according to the same methods scholars used when studying classical texts from the ancient world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This book offers a new account of the origins of biblical studies, illuminating the relation of the Bible to churchly readers, theological interpreters, academic critics, and people in between. It explains why, in an age of religious resurgence, modern biblical criticism may no longer be in a position to serve as the Bible&#8217;s disciplinary gatekeeper. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2122,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13928],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biblical-studies"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5k4cx-2u","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":159,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions\/159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shortword\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}