{"id":563,"date":"2007-02-27T15:59:27","date_gmt":"2007-02-27T19:59:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2007\/02\/27\/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-s"},"modified":"2007-02-27T15:59:27","modified_gmt":"2007-02-27T19:59:27","slug":"california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2007\/02\/27\/california-chief-justice-has-a-lot-to-say\/","title":{"rendered":"California Chief Justice has a lot to say"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 An article in today&#8217;s <em>California Progress Report<\/em> summarizes yesterday&#8217;s State of the Judiciary\u00a0Address by the state&#8217;s top judge, Ronald M. George, and\u00a0is aptly headlined, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.californiaprogressreport.com\/2007\/02\/californias_chi.html\">California&#8217;s Chief Justice Had a Lot to Say<\/a>\u00a0(Feb. 27, 2007)\u00a0[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/reference\/soj022607.htm\">full text<\/a>\u00a0of the Address, dated Feb. 26, 2007]\u00a0 CJ George specifically asks for 150 new judgeships (over the next three years), massive building\/renovation projects, higher salaries for judges and staff, signifcantly more self-help funding and interpreters, and support for an independent judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>Here are excerpts from CJ Ronald George&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/reference\/soj022607.htm\">2007 annual address<\/a>\u00a0that are especially relevant to <em>pro se<\/em> litigants and the issue of full access to justice:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"43\" alt=\"expect delays\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/08\/delays.gif\" width=\"60\" \/>\u00a0 &#8220;Last session, we proposed to you and the Governor a plan to create <strong>150 new judgeships<\/strong> to alleviate the most acute needs in the state.<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n&#8220;The reason is basic. Our shared focus on providing meaningful access to justice \u2014 and on employing various means to enable the court system to better meet the needs of our diverse population \u2014 all are aimed at the same goal: ensuring that individual litigants can have their matters fairly adjudicated. We can devise all sorts of innovative procedures to improve the way courts handle the disputes that litigants bring to the courts, but these measures will be meaningless if there is no judge to decide the cases.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"51\" alt=\"questionDude\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/08\/questionDudeS.gif\" width=\"50\" \/>\u00a0 &#8220;But meaningful access for all Californians requires much more. . . . The number of <strong>self-represented litigants<\/strong> continues to increase, and their needs will, in my opinion, pose the single most challenging issue for the courts in the coming decade. In some counties litigants appear without an attorney in 85 to 90% of family law and landlord\/tenant matters. The costs to the judicial system and to the public are high \u2014 impairing the ability of self-represented litigants to effectively vindicate their rights, undermining the ability of courts to efficiently process heavy caseloads, and eroding the public\u2019s confidence in our judicial system.&#8221;Self-help services provided at courthouses and other locations and on the judicial branch\u2019s website, augmented by legal aid and pro bono contributions by lawyers, are making a difference. But these activities are far from sufficient to meet the urgent needs of unrepresented litigants.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Beneath the fold, you will find excerpts on &#8220;Civil Gideon rights,&#8221; the need for interpreters, and the success of the JusticeCorps, along with information about JusticeCorps.<!--more--><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"61\" alt=\"ScalesRichPoor\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/08\/scales%20rich%20poor.jpg\" width=\"48\" \/>\u00a0<strong>[&#8220;Civil Gideon&#8221;]<\/strong>\u00a0&#8220;[S]ome cases simply are too complex for self-representation, or for particular litigants who are unable to navigate the legal process because of language or educational difficulties.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0At our request, the Governor has proposed $5 million in this year\u2019s budget for a pilot program to make legal representation available in a limited number of civil cases when the judge determines critical rights and issues are at stake. These include child custody matters, domestic violence, probate, housing and other matters with outcomes that affect basic rights. Three counties, one large, one medium, and one small, will be selected for the initial study. I can tell you that counties from every part of the state are vying to take part in this program. I strongly urge you to take the first steps to answer these pressing needs.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"26\" alt=\"black check\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/08\/black%20check.gif\" width=\"30\" \/>\u00a0&#8220;Moreover, Last year, because of funding concerns, resources were withheld from a bill to provide <strong>interpreter services<\/strong> in critical civil proceedings. There can be no access to justice for one who cannot understand the proceedings. Information and forms increasingly are available in Spanish and other languages in courthouses and on the Judicial Council\u2019s award-winning self-help website, but the need for interpreter services in the courtroom remains acute.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Meeting these needs will not be easy. There are numerous challenges, including the inadequate supply of qualified and certified court interpreters that we are working to supplement. But we must cope with the reality that every year more than 100 languages are spoken in California\u2019s courts, sometimes interpreted by the young children of non-English-speaking parties.&#8221;\u00a0\u00a0<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"50\" alt=\"JusticeCorpsLogo\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2007\/02\/JusticeCorpLogo.jpg\" width=\"50\" \/>\u00a0&#8220;No one approach to ensuring justice for all will answer every need. We also are expanding the <strong>JusticeCorps<\/strong>. This program trains college students to work as assistants in court-based self-help legal access centers.\u00a0 These students provide a unique source of assistance. Last year, the second class of JusticeCorps members in Los Angeles spoke 24 different languages and helped make it possible for self-help centers there to serve more than 122,000 persons. The response from those they help and from the courts in which they are providing assistance has been uniformly enthusiastic.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"50\" alt=\"JusticeCorpLogoN\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2007\/02\/JusticeCorpLogoN.jpg\" width=\"50\" \/>\u00a0 Click to learn more about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/programs\/justicecorps\/\">California JusticeCorps program<\/a>\u00a0(you will find, for example, a public service announcement in video and transcript form, plus contact information and news).\u00a0 The program is funded through an AmeriCoprs grant.\u00a0Here is information from the JusticeCorps <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/programs\/justicecorps\/jcorps_about.htm\">About<\/a> page:<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nAbout the California JusticeCorps Program<\/p>\n<p>What Is JusticeCorps?<\/p>\n<p>The JusticeCorps program presents an innovative approach to solving one of the more pressing issues faced by courts around the country today: providing equal access to justice. JusticeCorps recruits and trains 100 diverse university students annually to augment overburdened court and legal aid staff who are assisting self-represented litigants in court-based self-help programs in select locations throughout California. These highly motivated and well-trained students provide in-depth and individualized services to self-represented litigants, often in their own languages.<\/p>\n<p>Parties are given clear information and options, and then connected quickly to the right resources. Litigants are assisted in completing appropriate and accurate pleadings, written orders, and judgments under attorney supervision and, in the process, provided with a better understanding of the court system. \u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>JusticeCorps was first launched as a pilot program in Los Angeles County in 2004. One hundred volunteers were trained and placed in 10 legal self-help centers and at the county small claims advisor&#8217;s office. JusticeCorps members commit to serving 300 hours in the self-help centers and receive approximately 30 hours of training as well as a $1,000 education award when they complete the program. Visit the news section to see a summary of the program&#8217;s second year accomplishments. Based on the success of the Los Angeles pilot, the JusticeCorps Program expanded to the San Francisco Bay Area in fall 2006.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 An article in today&#8217;s California Progress Report summarizes yesterday&#8217;s State of the Judiciary\u00a0Address by the state&#8217;s top judge, Ronald M. George, and\u00a0is aptly headlined, California&#8217;s Chief Justice Had a Lot to Say\u00a0(Feb. 27, 2007)\u00a0[full text\u00a0of the Address, dated Feb. 26, 2007]\u00a0 CJ George specifically asks for 150 new judgeships (over the next three years), [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":437,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[991],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-items"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/437"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}