{"id":212,"date":"2006-10-19T20:18:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-20T00:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2006\/10\/19\/plain-language-forms-make-a-difference\/"},"modified":"2006-10-19T20:55:50","modified_gmt":"2006-10-20T00:55:50","slug":"plain-language-forms-make-a-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2006\/10\/19\/plain-language-forms-make-a-difference\/","title":{"rendered":"Plain Language Forms Make a Difference"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The California Courts have been changing some of their standard forms to make them more readable. Now there is a report of the first study of the readability of court forms, and it concludes that the changes did make a difference &#8212; a big one. Maria Mindlin, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.transcend.net\/pdf\/Comp_Read.pdf\"><em>Is Plain Language Better? Comparative Readability Study of Plain Language Forms<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(undated pdf); a version of the article is in 10 Scribes J. Legal Writing 55-65 (2005-2006). <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The researchers used 60 members of a jury pool in Sacramento County. Thirty were tested on a recent version of a subpoena duces tecum form and a &#8220;treated&#8221; (plain language) version of a form for proof\u00a0of service of process in a harassment case. The other thirty were tested on the former service of process form and the treated subpoena duces tecum form (renamed &#8220;Court Order: Go to Court\/Provide Documents&#8221;).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The people in the study were asked questions about the forms, such as &#8220;What do you think this\u00a0document is for?&#8221; and &#8220;What does this form tell you to do, exactly?&#8221; The percentages answering correctly were strikingly lopsided. Most people were baffled by the old forms and could understand and follow the directions in the new forms.<\/p>\n<p>This, of course, is good news for the ordinary people who have to use the forms.<\/p>\n<p>It is also good news for the courts, because compliance with the forms will be much higher. And interesting side benefit: &#8220;The Administrative Office of the Courts experienced a 43% reduction in translation fees (which are billed on a per word basis) when they transitioned the Domestic Violence forms to plain language.&#8221; (p. 5 n.11)<\/p>\n<p>In the short term, attorneys and other people experienced with the old forms will find\u00a0the new forms less\u00a0readable. They are used to &#8220;subpoena duces tecum&#8221; and will\u00a0have to adjust to &#8220;Court Order: Go to Court\/Provide Documents.&#8221; The good news for them is that they are skilled readers and will be able to become familiar with the new forms.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"559\" alt=\"Proof of Service.GIF\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/10\/Proof%20of%20Service.GIF\" width=\"696\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Excerpt from new <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/forms\/documents\/ch130.pdf\">proof of service form<\/a>, from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/cgi-bin\/forms.cgi\">California Admin. Ofc. of the Courts forms page<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The California Courts have been changing some of their standard forms to make them more readable. Now there is a report of the first study of the readability of court forms, and it concludes that the changes did make a difference &#8212; a big one. Maria Mindlin, Is Plain Language Better? Comparative Readability Study of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":502,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[898],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-studies-reports"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/502"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}