{"id":191,"date":"2006-10-13T10:21:39","date_gmt":"2006-10-13T14:21:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2006\/10\/13\/coordinated-pro-se-tax-haters-clogging-"},"modified":"2006-10-13T10:27:28","modified_gmt":"2006-10-13T14:27:28","slug":"coordinated-pro-se-tax-haters-clogging-up-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2006\/10\/13\/coordinated-pro-se-tax-haters-clogging-up-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"coordinated pro se tax-haters clogging up courts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">An article in today&#8217;s <em>Legal Times<\/em> discusses a spate of coordinated, mostly-<em>pro-se<\/em> &#8220;tax revolt&#8221; cases &#8212; 108 of them &#8212;\u00a0that have been filed in federal district courts across the country since last Fall.\u00a0\u00a0 (Law.com, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/jsp\/article.jsp?id=1160643919877\"><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><strong>Tax Revolt<\/strong>: Plaintiffs File Coordinated Cases Against IRS<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">,&#8221; Oct. 13, 2006)\u00a0<\/font> Reporter Emma Schwartz writes that &#8220;The effort hasn&#8217;t seen much success; so far, 40 have been dismissed because of the plaintiffs&#8217; failure to exhaust their administrative remedies. But the cases managed to pique curiosity in judges&#8217; chambers.&#8221;\u00a0 It appears that Schwartz has unearthed the mystery man behind the suits, &#8220;Chicago-based anti-tax activist George Pragovich&#8221;.<\/font><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"> <\/font><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Although most of the\u00a0litigants have refused to say who is behind their judicial\u00a0tax revolt, the wife of plaintiff Paul Broward is quoted saying that Pragovich\u00a0is &#8220;one of the major coordinators of what we&#8217;re doing. I just fill out the forms and send them in.&#8221;\u00a0 <\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\" \/><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><\/p>\n<div><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"36\" alt=\"checkedBox\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/files\/2006\/08\/checkedboxS.gif\" width=\"40\" \/>\u00a0I&#8217;m sure that some observers are going to point to these cases as another good reason to require lawyes for all litigants in federal court &#8212; using the legal fee as a deterrent to baseless or harassing suits, with lawyers as toll-taking gatekeepers.\u00a0 I believe that dealing with such <em>pro se<\/em> suits is\u00a0an appropriate\u00a0&#8220;cost&#8221; of ensuring the fundamental right of Americans to represent themselves in court.\u00a0 As stated in <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/shlep\/2006\/09\/22\/frivolous-pro-se-litigants-whos-to-blame\/\">our prior post<\/a> on frivolous <em>pro se<\/em> litigants, the proprer approach is for courts to use their powers to quickly dispatch cases that do not belong before them &#8212; either because they are frivolous or premature.\u00a0\u00a0 Our Government knows how to accommodate First Amendment-type rights into the operation of its\u00a0agencies.\u00a0\u00a0 We can&#8217;t let those who abuse such rights become an excuse to limit appropriate behavior by the vast majority of Americans.\u00a0<\/font><\/div>\n<p><\/font><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An article in today&#8217;s Legal Times discusses a spate of coordinated, mostly-pro-se &#8220;tax revolt&#8221; cases &#8212; 108 of them &#8212;\u00a0that have been filed in federal district courts across the country since last Fall.\u00a0\u00a0 (Law.com, &#8220;Tax Revolt: Plaintiffs File Coordinated Cases Against IRS,&#8221; Oct. 13, 2006)\u00a0 Reporter Emma Schwartz writes that &#8220;The effort hasn&#8217;t seen much [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":437,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[991,900],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-items","category-viewpoint"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/437"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/shlep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}