{"id":5502,"date":"2014-08-28T06:55:59","date_gmt":"2014-08-28T10:55:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.martinkramer.org\/sandbox\/?p=5502"},"modified":"2014-08-28T06:55:59","modified_gmt":"2014-08-28T10:55:59","slug":"gaza-auschwitz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/2014\/08\/gaza-auschwitz\/","title":{"rendered":"“Gaza = Auschwitz”"},"content":{"rendered":"

First published<\/a> in<\/em> Mosaic Magazine, August 26, 2014.<\/em><\/p>\n

Five years ago,<\/strong> during an earlier Israeli operation in Gaza, the British novelist Howard Jacobson explained<\/a> why \u201ccall[ing] the Israelis Nazis and liken[ing] Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto\u201d goes far beyond mere \u201ccriticism\u201d of Israel:<\/p>\n

Berating Jews with their own history, disinheriting them of pity, as though pity is negotiable or has a sell-by date, is the latest species of Holocaust denial. . . . Instead of saying the Holocaust didn\u2019t happen, the modern sophisticated denier accepts the event in all its terrible enormity, only to accuse the Jews of trying to profit from it, either in the form of moral blackmail or downright territorial theft. According to this thinking, the Jews have betrayed the Holocaust and become unworthy of it, the true heirs to their suffering being the Palestinians.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Experts call this Holocaust inversion. Based in the claim that Israel now behaves toward the Palestinians as Nazi Germany behaved toward the Jews, it originated in post-World War II Soviet propaganda, and from there spread to the Soviets\u2019 Arab clients. It is now fully embedded in the Arab-Muslim world, where it grows and mutates in symbiosis with outright denial that the Holocaust occurred or a radical reduction of its genocidal scale, ferocity, and number of victims. Holocaust inversion has a graphic omnipresence in cartoons<\/a> all over the Arab and Iranian press, where Israelis are regularly portrayed in Nazi regalia. Elsewhere in the Middle East and beyond, it has surfaced in the rhetoric of populist demagogues and the media. In Turkey\u2019s new president and long-time prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, it now has a champion<\/a> in a head of state. In Europe, Holocaust inversion is busy spreading beyond its original locus of infection and finding a home among intellectuals and activists, especially on the Left.<\/p>\n

Thankfully, the disease is still rather hard to find in America, where it festers in only a few dark places. Some of those places, regrettably, operate as institutions of higher learning, and in one of them\u2014Columbia University\u2014a number of professors, mainly instructors in Middle East studies, have distinguished themselves in the black art of defaming Israel as a Holocaust emulator. Only a decade ago, Columbia was compelled to investigate<\/a> departmental instructors who had been accused of intimidating their students with extreme anti-Israel diatribes. Not only did the university absolve its professors, however, it even granted tenure to the one faculty member against whom its own investigators found<\/a> a student\u2019s claims to be \u201ccredible.\u201d Encouraged by this green light, the extremists have been tunneling under Morningside Heights ever since, fortifying their positions and waiting for a signal to emerge firing.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The recent war in Gaza<\/strong> has supplied the signal. Columbia now boasts three American exponents of the process described by Jacobson as \u201chabituation to a language of loathing.\u201d<\/p>\n

The first is Hamid Dabashi, the Hagop Kevorkian professor of Iranian studies and comparative literature. Almost exactly ten years ago, Dabashi sized up the security personnel working at Israel\u2019s Ben-Gurion airport\u2014a \u201cfully fortified barrack,\u201d he called it\u2014in these words<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Half a century of systematic maiming and murdering of another people has left its deep marks on the faces of these people, the way they talk, the way they walk, the way they handle objects, the way they greet each other, the way they look at the world. There is an endemic prevarication to this machinery, a vulgarity of character that is bone-deep and structural to the skeletal vertebrae of its culture.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now, ten years later, Dabashi hasn\u2019t lost his capacity for demonizing Jews. In an article<\/a> entitled \u201cGaza: Poetry after Auschwitz,\u201d Dabashi borrows a title and what he imagines is a license from the post-Holocaust theorist Theodor Adorno to make his key point:<\/p>\n

What are Israelis? Who are Israelis? They are Israelis by virtue of what? By a shared and sustained murderous history\u2014from Deir Yassin in 1948 to Gaza in 2014. . . . After Gaza, not a single living Israeli can utter the word \u201cAuschwitz\u201d without it sounding like \u201cGaza.\u201d Auschwitz as a historical fact is now archival. Auschwitz as a metaphor is now Palestinian. From now on, every time any Israeli, every time any Jew, anywhere in the world, utters the word \u201cAuschwitz,\u201d or the word \u201cHolocaust,\u201d the world will hear \u201cGaza.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Once again, there is the conflation of Israel with \u201cmurder\u201d\u2014and not just murder but, in a new step for Dabashi, a \u201csustained murderous history\u201d that has finally achieved Holocaust-class status: in Gaza, he writes, Israel has created an Auschwitz. As a \u201chistorical fact,\u201d the real Auschwitz\u2014the one where 500 totally innocent Jews perished for every single innocent or guilty Palestinian killed in Israel\u2019s recent operation\u2014is now merely \u201carchival.\u201d Now, the world\u2019s most infamous death camp has become a \u201cmetaphor\u201d for a place where, as it just so happens, the population grows by almost three percent per year. Such is the abyss of ignorance, bigotry, and casual mendacity inhabited by Columbia\u2019s chaired professor of Iranian studies and comparative literature.<\/p>\n

Next up is Joseph Massad, associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history and the man who, having compiled the clearest record of classroom intimidation at the very time he was being considered for promotion to permanent faculty status, stood at the center of the last Columbia scandal. Then, in his struggle for academic survival, Massad had protested<\/a> to the university\u2019s investigating committee that the \u201clie . . . claiming that I would equate Israel with Nazi Germany\u201d\u2014the essence of one student accusation\u2014\u201cis abhorrent. I have never made such a reprehensible equation.\u201d In a moment that won\u2019t be remembered as Columbia\u2019s finest, President Lee Bollinger and his board, succumbing to the bullying of radical faculty members, granted him tenure.<\/p>\n

By 2009, after another Gaza flare-up, Massad no longer had any need for dissimulation. The professor who had found \u201creprehensible\u201d the equation of Israel with Nazi Germany published an article<\/a> entitled \u201cThe Gaza Ghetto Uprising.\u201d Illustrated by the famous image of a surrendering child in the Warsaw ghetto, the article invoked an alleged Israeli plan to \u201cmake Israel a purely Jewish state that is Pal\u00e4stinener-rein<\/em>,\u201d and characterized the Palestinian Authority\u2014or, rather, \u201cthe Israeli-created Palestinian Collaborationist Authority\u201d\u2014as \u201cthe judenrat<\/em>, the Nazi equivalent\u201d in this scenario. Al Jazeera<\/em> ran a pathetic response<\/a> by an American Jewish critic of Israel who scolded the author for damaging the Palestinian cause.<\/p>\n

Last year, Massad penned another effort<\/a>, \u201cThe Last of the Semites,\u201d carrying the equation back in time. It was, he, postulated, their \u201cshared goal of expelling Jews from Europe as a separate unassimilable race that created the affinity between Nazis and Zionists all along.\u201d Massad ended the article by anointing the Palestinians as the true \u201cheirs\u201d of the pre-Holocaust Jewish struggle against anti-Semitism. So great was the revulsion caused by this piece of Holocaust inversion that its publisher, Al Jazeera<\/em>, pulled<\/a> it for a time.<\/p>\n

Massad views each Israeli-Palestinian crisis as an opportunity to extend the range of his \u201clanguage of loathing.\u201d The Nazi analogy no longer sufficing, he has now seized upon the latest conflict in Gaza to promote yet another loaded trope: Israel as the international Jew engaged in child sacrifice. In an piece<\/a> devoted to the role of foreign volunteers in the Israeli military, Massad slips in a crucial phrase denouncing these \u201cinternational Zionist Jewish brigades of baby-killers.\u201d<\/p>\n

There\u2019s an irony here, and a tragic one. During Columbia\u2019s investigation of the complaints against him, Massad was most vigorously defended by an unlikely student supporter, who once showed up<\/a> on campus in a sandwich board inscribed \u201cI served in the Israeli army. I love Massad.\u201d The student, who insisted that \u201cnobody calls me a baby-killer when I go to office hours,\u201d later committed suicide, and is memorialized at Columbia through a summer travel scholarship<\/a> for students in the Middle East program. With Massad\u2019s own airing of the \u201cbaby-killer\u201d canard, the professor has now betrayed the ghost of his most ardent Jewish defender.<\/p>\n

And then there is Rashid Khalidi, holder of the Edward Said chair of modern Arab studies and a professor of a somewhat higher class. While Dabashi and Massad find it difficult to place their effusions in publications other than the death-to-Israel Electronic Intifada<\/em> or the angry-Arab Al Jazeera<\/em> and Ahram Weekly<\/em>, Khalidi has entr\u00e9e to the elite liberal New York press. He also knows enough not to try his editors\u2019 patience with naked examples of Holocaust inversion. Yet here he was, in a piece<\/a> for the New Yorker<\/em>, creeping up to the edge. Decrying the \u201ccollective punishment\u201d being meted out to Gaza, Khalidi introduces his telltale allusion: \u201cThe truth of ghettos . . . is that, eventually, the ghetto will fight back. It was true in Soweto and Belfast, and it is true in Gaza.\u201d<\/p>\n

Soweto and Belfast? Where\u2019s Warsaw? It\u2019s there, hovering in the background, as was pointed out<\/a> by two political scientists examining the increasingly popular use of \u201cthe language of genocide and the Holocaust with reference to Gaza\u201d:<\/p>\n

An example of this trend [they write] is a growing use of the word \u201cghetto,\u201d a term associated directly (but in no way exclusively) with the Holocaust to describe the Gaza Strip. . . . While [Rashid] Khalidi does not directly compare the Gaza violence to the Holocaust (he uses the examples of Belfast and Soweto), the image of a fighting ghetto is strongly associated with the Warsaw ghetto.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Indeed, a few days after his article appeared, Khalidi confirmed<\/a> just which ghetto he meant by denouncing \u201cthe siege, the blockade, the starvation of these people\u201d in Gaza. The Nazis did indeed starve<\/a> the Warsaw ghetto, and famine killed thousands. But not a soul has died of starvation in Gaza, and if stunted growth in childhood is a measure of poor nutrition, Gaza\u2019s rate is lower<\/a> than that of any Arab state but Qatar. Philip Gourevitch, also writing<\/a> in the New Yorker<\/em>, characterized Khalidi\u2019s ghetto-referencing piece as an instance of \u201cmagical thinking.\u201d He was being charitable.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Beyond these three cases<\/strong>, another Columbia-related episode is worth noting. Probably the cleverest of the anti-Israel lot on Morningside Heights is Nadia Abu El-Haj, associate professor of anthropology at Barnard College. A few years back, she, too, won a bruising tenure battle. But in her case, the outcome was never in doubt because (unlike Massad) she trod lightly. \u201cI\u2019m not a public intellectual,\u201d she said<\/a> at the time. \u201cI\u2019m drawn to archives, to disciplines where the evidence sits for a while. I don\u2019t court controversy.\u201d This, despite the fact that her entire \u201cacademic\u201d project is aimed at casting<\/a> Zionism as the fabrication of a totally specious national identity. \u201cIsrael is a settler<\/em>-nation,\u201d she writes, \u201cthat is, a project of European colonial settlement that imagined and believed itself to be a project of national return.\u201d Those deceiving Zionists\u2014they even duped themselves<\/em> into thinking they were going home!<\/p>\n

Much too smart to indulge in Holocaust inversion, Abu El-Haj hit upon an alternative in a recent contribution<\/a> to the London Review of Books<\/em>:<\/p>\n

The IDF\u2019s tactics [in Gaza] recall the logic of the British and American firebombing of German and Japanese cities during World War II: target the civilian population. Make them pay an unbearable price. Then they will turn against their own regime. When Israel attacks hospitals in Gaza, when it wipes out extended families, when it mows down children running on a beach, it is engaged in a premeditated act.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

No Auschwitz or Warsaw ghetto for Abu El-Haj. But Dresden and Tokyo\u2014why not? So what if Israel, unlike the Allies in World War II, warns civilians of impending strikes and, again unlike the Allies, eschews area bombardment and incendiary bombs? So what if one night of bombing over Tokyo killed 50 times as many as Israel\u2019s month-long campaign in Gaza?<\/p>\n

When you see four boys dead on a Gaza beach, Abu El-Haj wants you to \u201crecall,\u201d with her, the 40,000 civilians killed in Hamburg. (Sorry, the actual figure was 42,000\u2014but what\u2019s another 2,000 here or there? Either way, the entire toll in Gaza fits into the margin of error of one firebombing in World War II.) Might the Israelis, in their targeting, ever commit something as human as a mistake, even a negligent one? No, they\u2019re far too inhuman for that: when they kill, it\u2019s always \u201cpremeditated.\u201d \u201cNothing Unintentional\u201d is the delicate title of Abu El-Haj\u2019s article, which might as well have been called \u201cBaby-Killers.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is such a thing as legitimate criticism of Israel, and there is such a thing as crossing the line into demonization and, to put it plainly, Jew-baiting. The analogies spewed by Columbia\u2019s tenured professors are of the latter kind, and are obscene. Jew-baiting covers a wider range than anti-Semitism, and Holocaust inversion is its favorite technique. Jew-baiting is the demand that Israel and its supporters explain<\/a> why Gaza isn\u2019t<\/em> like a Nazi extermination camp or a starved ghetto for the doomed, or why a targeted air campaign isn\u2019t<\/em> just like the incineration of Dresden. That it should be practiced so openly by tenured professors at New York\u2019s Ivy League home is a scandal, and a warning.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Holocaust inversion, casting Israelis as Nazis and Palestinians as their Jewish victims, finds advocates on the faculty of Columbia University. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1167,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[15067,101270,18945,101194,101310,21063],"class_list":["post-5502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-columbia","tag-hamid-dabashi","tag-holocaust","tag-joseph-massad","tag-nadia-abu-el-haj","tag-rashid-khalidi"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/sandbox\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}