{"id":4265,"date":"2017-02-22T10:51:38","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T15:51:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/?p=4265"},"modified":"2017-02-22T10:56:47","modified_gmt":"2017-02-22T15:56:47","slug":"etiquette-at-washington","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/2017\/02\/22\/etiquette-at-washington\/","title":{"rendered":"Etiquette at Washington"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n

The\u00a0Industrial Revolution in America created a consumer economy, shifting traditional wealth and power away from the long standing blue-blood families\u00a0and towards the capitalist magnate and a\u00a0developing new middle class. The idea of the “self-made” American was clearly at odds with the traditional aristocratic and elitist mores of the past centuries. Yet at the same time, this “new” class hungered for similar\u00a0customs of\u00a0exclusivity to differentiate themselves from the working class and the less fortunate. The\u00a0new middle class, built on wealth and economic clout, wanted to purchase an American code of mores and manners, similar to\u00a0buying opulent homes, fashionable\u00a0clothing, or new technology. During this period, a proliferation in etiquette books were printed, providing social rules\u00a0for a new American “polite society”. The “Etiquette at Washington” publication was promoted as an “insider’s guide” by a local citizen, aimed at educating those visiting or moving to Washington D.C. \u00a0It has some interesting sections on social conventions for the presidency and other federal institutions and officials.<\/p>\n

“This is a modest little volume, purporting to be the <\/span>Oracle of <\/span>fashion and good-breeding, in <\/span>which one may learn like Sheridan’s heroine, to “start by <\/span>rule and blush by <\/span>example”\u2014 to take wine with <\/span>grace\u2014eat with <\/span>ease\u2014enter a room with <\/span>dignity\u2014sustain one’s self with <\/span>all possible sangfroid under the <\/span>most trying circumstances\u2014and finally to be buried according to the <\/span>strictest notions of <\/span>propriety. This book must be esteemed available acquisition by <\/span>those who hold a solecism in <\/span>taste as worse than a crime, and more readily pardon the <\/span>neglect of <\/span>a bill, than a failure to answer an invitation to dinner. Nothing escapes the <\/span>attention\u00a0of the <\/span>writer.” \u00a0 \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

—<\/i>a review from the\u00a0Southern Literary Messenger, v.15<\/strong><\/p>\n

Some excerpts:<\/p>\n

The President:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Every citizen of the United States who visits Washington, considers that he has a claim to visit the Chief Magistrate of the Union, and he is accordingly presented to him, and after shaking hands and conversing for a few moments, retires, delighted with the suavity of the President, and elevated in his own estimation. Strangers who are awaiting an audience in the ante-room, are frequently much annoyed at witnessing individuals who come long after, admitted before them….<\/em>An invitation to dine with the President cannot be declined, except under the most pressing circumstances, without the greatest breach of respect to the Chief Magistrate of the Union. An invitation from him, is a sufficient apology for declining an invitation previously given and accepted.<\/em><\/p>\n

General Society:<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is no place in the United States where less attention is paid to mere money than at the seat of government; and the millionaire, whose magnificent equipage attracts such attention in the commercial cities, is surprised at the little influence he exercises here. The truth is that the great personages who form the centre\u00a0of attraction are generally not rich men, and make but little attempt in their style of living. It is no unusual thing to find a Senator, whose lofty talents and gifted eloquence are the theme of every tongue, plainly lodged with his family at furnished apartments, provided for him by a French cook, or forming a part of a mess composed of six or eight of his fellow Senators.<\/em><\/p>\n

Customs:<\/strong><\/p>\n

It sometimes becomes necessary to perform the unpleasant duty, of ridding oneself of a disagreeable or improper acquaintance, and in no situation is true politeness more necessary\u00a0than in this. The object is not to produce an open rupture, but simply to inform the proscribed person of a desire for a discontinuance of the acquaintance, which can usually be accomplished by an adherence, more rigid than ordinary, to the strict observances of ceremony. If he is too dull to observe this, more decided measures are warrantable.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
<\/dt>\n
Description:<\/dt>\n
Etiquette at Washington together with the customs adopted by polite society in the other cities of the United States. To which is added an appendix, containing an accurate description of the public buildings in Washington. Baltimore :: John Murphy & Co., printers and publishers, 1850.<\/span><\/dd>\n
Persistent Link:<\/dt>\n
http:\/\/nrs.harvard.edu\/urn-3:FHCL:30211081<\/a><\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n
Repository:<\/dt>\n
Widener Library<\/dd>\n
Institution:<\/dt>\n
Harvard University<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The\u00a0Industrial Revolution in America created a consumer economy, shifting traditional wealth and power away from the long standing blue-blood families\u00a0and towards the capitalist magnate and a\u00a0developing new middle class. The idea of the “self-made” American was clearly at odds with the traditional aristocratic and elitist mores of the past centuries. Yet at the same time, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2559,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2559"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4265"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4280,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4265\/revisions\/4280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/preserving\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}