{"id":729,"date":"2011-03-12T15:28:28","date_gmt":"2011-03-12T20:28:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/?p=729"},"modified":"2013-03-17T16:49:09","modified_gmt":"2013-03-17T20:49:09","slug":"the-importance-of-dark-deposit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2011\/03\/12\/the-importance-of-dark-deposit\/","title":{"rendered":"The importance of dark deposit"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hubble’s Dark Matter Map from flickr user NASA Goddard Photo and Video, used by permission<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The Harvard repository, DASH<\/a>, comprises several thousand articles in all fields of scholarship. These articles are stored and advertised through an item page providing metadata \u2014 such as title, author, citation, abstract, and link to the definitive version of record \u2014 which typically allows downloading of the article as well. But not all articles are distributed. On some of the item pages, the articles themselves can’t be downloaded; they are “dark”. The decision whether or not to allow for dark articles in a repository comes up sufficiently often that it is worth rehearsing the several reasons to allow it.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Posterity: <\/strong>Repositories have a role in providing access to scholarly articles of course. But an important part of the purpose of a repository is to collect the research output of the institution as broadly as possible. Consider the mission of a university archives, well described in this Harvard statement: “The Harvard University Archives<\/a>\u00a0(HUA) supports the University’s dual mission of education and research by striving to preserve and provide access to Harvard’s historical records; to gather an accurate, authentic, and complete record of the life of the University; and to promote the highest standards of management for Harvard’s current records.” Although the role of the university archives and the repository are different, that part about “gather[ing] an accurate, authentic, and complete record of the life of the University” reflects this role of the repository as well.Since at any given time some of the articles that make up that output will not be distributable, the broadest collection requires some portion of the collection to be dark.<\/li>\n
  2. Change:<\/strong> The rights situation for any given article can change over time \u2014 especially over long time scales, librarian time scales \u2014 and having materials in the repository dark allows them to be distributed if and when the rights situation allows. An obvious case is articles under a publisher embargo. In that case, the date of the change is known, and repository software can typically handle the distributability change automatically. There are also changes that are more difficult to predict. For instance, if a publisher changes its distribution policies, or releases backfiles as part of a corporate change, this might allow distribution where not previously allowed. Having the materials dark means that the institution can take advantage of such changes in the rights situation without having to hunt down the articles at that (perhaps much) later date.<\/li>\n
  3. Preservation: <\/strong>Dark materials can still be preserved. Preservation of digital objects is by and large an unknown prospect, but one thing we know is that the more venues and methods available for preservation, the more likely the materials will be preserved. Repositories provide yet another venue for preservation of their contents, including the dark part.<\/li>\n
  4. Discoverability:<\/strong> Although the articles themselves can’t be distributed, their contents can be indexed to allow for the items in the repository to be more easily and accurately located. Articles deposited dark can be found based on searches that hit not only the title and abstract but the full text of the article. And it can be technologically possible to pass on this indexing power to other services indexing the repository, such as search engines.<\/li>\n
  5. Messaging:<\/strong> When repositories allow both open and dark materials, the message to faculty and researchers can be made very simple: Always deposit<\/a>. Everything can go in; the distribution decision can be made separately. If authors have to worry about rights when making the decision whether to deposit in the first place, the cognitive load may well lead them to just not deposit. Since the hardest part about running a successful repository is getting a hold of the articles themselves, anything that lowers that load is a good thing. This point has been made forcefully by Stevan Harnad. It is much easier to get faculty in the habit of depositing everything than in the habit of depositing articles subject to the exigencies of their rights situations.<\/li>\n
  6. Availability: <\/strong>There are times when an author has distribution rights only to unavailable versions of an article. For instance, an author may have rights to distribute the author’s final manuscript, but not the publisher’s version. Or an art historian may not have cleared rights for online distribution of the figures in an article and may not be willing to distribute a redacted version of the article without the figures. The ability to deposit dark enables depositing in these cases too. The publisher’s version or unredacted version can be deposited dark.<\/li>\n
  7. Education: <\/strong>Every time an author deposits an article dark is a learning moment reminding the author that distribution is important and distribution limitations are problematic.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    For all these reasons, I believe that it is important to allow for dark items in an article repository. Better dark than missing.<\/p>\n

    [Hat tip to Sue Kriegsman<\/a> for discussions on this issue.]<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Hubble’s Dark Matter Map from flickr user NASA Goddard Photo and Video, used by permission The Harvard repository, DASH, comprises several thousand articles in all fields of scholarship. These articles are stored and advertised through an item page providing metadata \u2014 such as title, author, citation, abstract, and link to the definitive version of record […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2110,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[618,68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-open-access","category-scholarly-communication"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5pLfN-bL","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2445,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2022\/07\/25\/moderating-principles\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":0},"title":"Moderating principles","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Monday, July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Some time around April 1994, I founded the Computation and Language E-Print Archive, the first preprint repository for a subfield of computer science. It was hosted on Paul Ginsparg\u2019s arXiv platform, which at the time had been hosting only physics papers, built out from the original arXiv repository for high-energy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "computational linguistics"","block_context":{"text":"computational linguistics","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/linguistics\/computational-linguistics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":588,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2010\/09\/07\/for-publishers-using-pmc-to-kill-multiple-birds-with-one-stone\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":1},"title":"For publishers, using PMC to kill multiple birds with one stone","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Tuesday, September 7, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's a clever way for a journal to efficiently and cost-effectively provide open access to its articles (at least in the life sciences): Use PubMed Central as the journal's article repository. This expedient has all kinds of advantages: You have to allow for PMC distribution anyway, in fields where much\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "open access"","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"PubMed Central logo","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/corehtml\/pmc\/pmcgifs\/pmclogo.gif?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":56,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2009\/05\/27\/some-background-on-open-access\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":2},"title":"Some background on open access","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, May 27, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"I assume that readers of the open access discussions on this blog are familiar with the state of play in the area, but just in case, here's some background. Peter Suber defines open access in his A Very Brief Introduction to Open Access as follows: \"Open-access (OA) literature is digital,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "meta"","block_context":{"text":"meta","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/meta\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":456,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2010\/05\/27\/green-oa-as-appropriation\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":3},"title":"Green OA as “appropriation”","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Thursday, May 27, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Sandy Thatcher feels \"very uneasy about the massive postings of Green OA articles at sites like Harvard\u2019s, which given that university\u2019s great prestige may well lead to the widespread appropriation of those versions by scholars who find it easier to access them OA than to hunt down (and perhaps pay\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "open access"","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":471,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2010\/06\/09\/a-proposal-to-simplify-the-university-of-north-texas-open-access-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":4},"title":"A proposal to simplify the University of North Texas open-access policy","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, June 9, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"\"In High Places\", statue by Gerald Balciar, University of North Texas - Denton campus, installed 1990. Image via Wikipedia. The University of North Texas is engaged in a laudable process of designing an open-access policy for their community. Draft language for their policy is now available at their site on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "open access"","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/thumb\/c\/c4\/UNT_Eagle_statue.jpg\/300px-UNT_Eagle_statue.jpg","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1515,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2012\/09\/17\/is-the-harvard-open-access-policy-legally-sound\/","url_meta":{"origin":729,"position":5},"title":"Is the Harvard open-access policy legally sound?","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Monday, September 17, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"...evidenced by a written instrument... \"To Sign a Contract 3\" image by shho. Used by permission. The idea behind rights-retention open-access policies is, as this year\u2019s OA Week slogan goes, to \u201cset the default to open access\u201d. Traditionally, authors retained rights to their scholarly articles only if they expressly negotiated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "open access"","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2110"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=729"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":752,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729\/revisions\/752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}