{"id":1139,"date":"2012-02-25T19:03:51","date_gmt":"2012-02-26T00:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/?p=1139"},"modified":"2012-05-15T09:16:08","modified_gmt":"2012-05-15T13:16:08","slug":"is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2012\/02\/25\/is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the pot calling the kettle black?"},"content":{"rendered":"<table width=\"200\" align=\"right\" bgcolor=\"#F7EFE5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/41597157@N00\/3053948214\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/3053948214_c446d6969b.jpg\" alt=\"...time to switch...\" width=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"color: #999999\">\u201c&#8230;the interpersonal processes that a student goes through&#8230;\u201d<br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 85%\"><em>Harvard students<\/em> (2008) by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/41597157@N00\/\">E&gt;mar<\/a> via flickr. Used by permission (<a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/2.0\/\">CC by-nc-nd<\/a>)<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Is the pot calling the kettle black? Oh sure, journal prices are going up, but so is tuition. How can universities complain about journal price hyperinflation if tuition is hyperinflating too?\u00a0Why can&#8217;t universities use that income stream to pay for the rising journal costs?<\/p>\n<p>There are several problems with this argument, above and\u00a0beyond\u00a0the obvious one that two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right.<\/p>\n<p>First, tuition fees aren&#8217;t the bulk of a university&#8217;s revenue stream. So\u00a0even if it were true that\u00a0tuition is hyperinflating at the pace of journal prices,\u00a0that wouldn&#8217;t mean that university revenues were keeping pace with journal prices.<\/p>\n<p>Second, a journal is a monopolistic good. If its price hyperinflates, buyers can&#8217;t go elsewhere for a substitute; it&#8217;s pay or do without. But a college education can be arranged for at thousands of institutions. Students and their families can and do shop\u00a0around\u00a0for the best bang for the buck. (Just do a search for &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=best+college+deals#sclient=psy-ab&amp;hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=best+college+values&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=best+college+values&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g4&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=3&amp;gs_upl=8472l9191l0l9624l6l4l0l2l2l0l185l562l0.4l6l0&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&amp;fp=cd966fbc5ee5cb60&amp;biw=1013&amp;bih=649\">best college values<\/a>&#8221; for the evidence.) In economists&#8217; parlance, colleges are economic substitutes. So even if it were true that tuition at a given college is hyperinflating\u00a0at the pace of journal prices, individual students can adjust accordingly. As the College Board says in their report on\u00a0\u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/trends.collegeboard.org\/college_pricing\">Trends in College Pricing 2011<\/a>\u201d:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Neither changes in average published prices nor changes in average net prices necessarily describe the circumstances facing individual students. There is considerable variation in prices across sectors and across states and regions as well as among institutions within these categories. College students in the United States have a wide variety of educational institutions from which to choose, and these come with many different price tags.<\/p>\n<p>Third, a journal article is a pure information good. What you buy is the content. Pure\u00a0information\u00a0goods include things like novels and music CDs. They tend to have high fixed costs and low marginal costs, leading to large economies of scale. But a college education is not a pure information good. Sure, you are paying in part to acquire some particular knowledge, say, by listening to a lecture. But far more important are the interpersonal processes that a student participates in: interacting with faculty, other instructional staff, librarians, other students, in their dormitories, labs, libraries, and classrooms, and so forth. It is through the person-to-person hands-on interactions that a college education develops knowledge, skills,\u00a0and character.<\/p>\n<p>This aspect of college education has high marginal costs. One would not expect it to exhibit the economies of scale of a pure information good. So even if it were true that\u00a0tuition is hyperinflating at the pace of journal prices, that would not take the journals off the hook; they should be able to operate with much higher economies of scale than a college by virtue of the type of good they are.<a name=\"ref1\" href=\"#fn1\"><\/a><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><em>Which makes it all the more surprising that the claims about college tuition hyperinflating at the rate of journals are, as it turns out, just plain false.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s look at what the average Harvard College student pays for his or her education. <!--more-->When we talk about journal prices hyperinflating, we&#8217;re not just talking about list prices but about the net prices that libraries actually pay for the journals. If list prices hyperinflate but publishers provide discounts that moderate the inflation, you can&#8217;t hold the list prices against them. But the hyperinflation in serials prices has been in net costs\u2014for instance, as recorded by the annual ARL serials price surveys.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly for colleges we need to look at net prices, not list prices. The list price of a college education, the <em>cost of attendance<\/em> (COA) is the published tuition and fees, room and board; the net price subtracts whatever financial aid the college provides. There is a substantial difference between the two, as this chart shows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/gross-vs-net1.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-1171\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/gross-vs-net1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/gross-vs-net1.png 1081w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/gross-vs-net1-244x300.png 244w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/gross-vs-net1-834x1024.png 834w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1081px) 100vw, 1081px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The green line, the average net COA (in green) has increased, surely, but not nearly as quickly as the list COA (in blue). And it is the net COA that we are concerned with.<\/p>\n<p>We also need to make sure that we are comparing costs appropriately over time. We should compare in inflation-adjusted dollars. Looking at the net COA normalized against the consumer price index (CPI-U, in 1996 dollars), things look quite different:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-infl-adj1.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-1172\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-infl-adj1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-infl-adj1.png 1052w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-infl-adj1-238x300.png 238w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-infl-adj1-812x1024.png 812w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1052px) 100vw, 1052px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Net Harvard COA has been basically flat for the last 15 years or so, with, in fact, a dip in the last few years.<\/p>\n<p>Now, we can place the inflation-adjusted net COA on the same chart as inflation-adjusted net serials expenditures to gauge the comparison between the two. (I normalize them to 1996 = 1 so that the changes over time can be compared.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-vs-serials2.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-1187\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-vs-serials2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-vs-serials2.png 519w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-vs-serials2-234x300.png 234w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 519px) 100vw, 519px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Is this unique to Harvard? Certainly there is a lot of variation in net COA among different groups of colleges. Public universities have been losing large amounts of their state subsidies over the last few years, leading to real net COA increases. But those tuition increases result from a subsidy being reduced; they aren&#8217;t generating windfall revenue increases to pay for journal price increases. Private four-year colleges and universities have not had huge increases in revenues from students. The College Board&#8217;s study shows that over the time period they looked at<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Average published tuition and fees at private nonprofit four-year colleges and universities are about $3,730 higher (in 2011 dollars) in 2011-12 than they were in 2006-07, but the average net tuition paid by full-time students in this sector <em>declined by $550 in inflation-adjusted dollars<\/em> over this five-year period. (College Board, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/trends.collegeboard.org\/college_pricing\">Trends in College Pricing 2011<\/a>\u201d. Emphasis added.)<\/p>\n<p>You can be the judge as to whether a tuition decrease of $100 per year in real dollars constitutes hyperinflation at journal-price levels.<\/p>\n<p>The hyperinflation in journal prices looks especially bad when we compare it against other pure information goods, say, music CDs. The information technology revolution has led to tremendous efficiencies in generating and distributing information goods. In the presence of competition, this leads in general to great efficiencies and price reductions, a phenomenon we see clearly in CD price history. Why hasn&#8217;t the journal publishing industry been able to generate similar efficiency gains over time? Shouldn&#8217;t journal prices be going <em>down<\/em>, not up?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-serials-cds1.png\"><br \/>\n<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-serials-cds2.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-1188\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-serials-cds2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-serials-cds2.png 513w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/files\/2012\/02\/net-coa-serials-cds2-232x300.png 232w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 513px) 100vw, 513px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">[<strong>Update May 15, 2012:<\/strong> NPR&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/money\/\">Planet Money podcast<\/a>\u00a0for May 11, 2012 featured a story\u00a0(&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/money\/2012\/05\/11\/152511771\/the-real-price-of-college\">The Real Price of College<\/a>&#8220;) on the divergence of list and net college prices \u00a0stating the same conclusion of stable net COA over the last decade. They go into great detail about why list prices are increasing while net prices remain roughly constant.]<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: left\">Data sources:<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Serials expenditure data are from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arl.org\/stats\/annualsurveys\/index.shtml\">ARL Annual Surveys<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Harvard COA and net COA data are courtesy of Harvard&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.provost.harvard.edu\/institutional_research\/\">Office of\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Research<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">CD prices are from the RIAA report &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.riaa.com\/newsitem.php?news_year_filter=&amp;resultpage=61&amp;id=4F9A7FD3-2800-B395-28D2-416B8BF83D02\">CDs are a better value than ever!<\/a>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><a href=\"ftp:\/\/ftp.bls.gov\/pub\/special.requests\/cpi\/cpiai.txt\">Consumer price index data<\/a> are from the US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a name=\"fn1\" href=\"#ref1\"><\/a><sup>[1]<\/sup>You may say that this aspect of college education is a waste of money. The Khan Academy is able to teach algebra at essentially zero marginal cost. This is true, and its tuition is not hyperinflating either. If students want that kind of education, that&#8217;s fine, but for better or worse that is not the type of education provided by institutions that have libraries that subscribe to journals, so is irrelevant to\u00a0this\u00a0argument.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c&#8230;the interpersonal processes that a student goes through&#8230;\u201d Harvard students (2008) by E&gt;mar via flickr. Used by permission (CC by-nc-nd) Is the pot calling the kettle black? Oh sure, journal prices are going up, but so is tuition. How can universities complain about journal price hyperinflation if tuition is hyperinflating too?\u00a0Why can&#8217;t universities use that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2110,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2780,68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libraries","category-scholarly-communication"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5pLfN-in","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2104,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2014\/06\/04\/how-universities-can-support-open-access-journal-publishing\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":0},"title":"How universities can support open-access journal publishing","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, June 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"To university administrators and librarians: ...enablement becomes transformation... \"Shelf of journals\" image from Flickr user University of Illinois Library. Used by permission. As a university administrator or librarian, you may see the future in open-access journal publishing and may be motivated to help bring that future about.1 I would urge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;libraries&quot;","block_context":{"text":"libraries","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/libraries\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1203,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2012\/03\/06\/an-efficient-journal\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":1},"title":"An efficient journal","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Tuesday, March 6, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cYou seem to believe in fairies.\u201d Photo of the Cottingley Fairies, 1917, by Elsie Wright via Wikipedia. Aficionados of open access should know about the Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), an open-access journal in my own research field of artificial intelligence, a subfield of computer science concerned with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;computer science&quot;","block_context":{"text":"computer science","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/computer-science\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1000,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2011\/11\/16\/how-should-funding-agencies-pay-open-access-fees\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":2},"title":"How should funding agencies pay open-access fees?","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, November 16, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c...a drop in the bucket.\u201dDrop I (2007) by Delox - Martin De\u00e1k via flickr. Used by permission (CC by-nc-nd) At the recent Berlin 9 conference, there was much talk about the role of funding agencies in open-access publication, both through funding-agency-operated journals like the new eLife journal\u00a0and through direct reimbursement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;open access&quot;","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1647,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2013\/01\/29\/why-open-access-is-better-for-scholarly-societies\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":3},"title":"Why open access is better for scholarly societies","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Tuesday, January 29, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"[This is a heavily edited transcript of a talk that I gave on January 3, 2013, at a panel on open access at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA, the main scholarly society for linguistics, and publisher of the journal Language), co-sponsored by the Modern\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;open access&quot;","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":56,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2009\/05\/27\/some-background-on-open-access\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":4},"title":"Some background on open access","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, May 27, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"I assume that readers of the open access discussions on this blog are familiar with the state of play in the area, but just in case, here's some background. Peter Suber defines open access in his A Very Brief Introduction to Open Access as follows: \"Open-access (OA) literature is digital,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;meta&quot;","block_context":{"text":"meta","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/meta\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1789,"url":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/2013\/07\/10\/ecumenical-open-access-and-the-finch-report-principles\/","url_meta":{"origin":1139,"position":5},"title":"Ecumenical open access and the Finch Report principles","author":"Stuart Shieber","date":"Wednesday, July 10, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"...myopic... \"myopic\" image by flickr user haglundc used by permission. I was invited by the British Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences to write a piece on last year's report \"Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications\" by the\u00a0Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;open access&quot;","block_context":{"text":"open access","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/category\/scholarly-communication\/open-access\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2110"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":38,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1346,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions\/1346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/pamphlet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}