{"id":3,"date":"2006-09-13T22:41:58","date_gmt":"2006-09-14T02:41:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/williams\/"},"modified":"2014-09-11T00:16:45","modified_gmt":"2014-09-11T04:16:45","slug":"williams","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/williams\/","title":{"rendered":"Williams"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Brief of Akhil Reed Amar and Arthur McEvoy as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Respondent<\/strong>, filed on Sept. 15, 2006, in <em>Philip Morris USA v. Williams<\/em>, No. 05-1256 (U.S. Supreme Court) (a case raising constitutional issues pertaining to the common-law tort remedy of exemplary or punitive damages), and related materials<strong>.<\/strong><strong>Copy of brief, <a title=\"Amar-McEvoy amicus brief\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/2006-09-15_PMvWilliams_Amar-McEvoy_amicus_brief.pdf\">here<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Materials from earlier U.S. Supreme Court cases cited in the brief: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Copy of 1996 <em>amicus<\/em> brief by Professors Amar and McEvoy, et. al., in <em>Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities<\/em>, 517 U.S. 1102 (1996), <a title=\"Gasperini amicus brief\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1996_amicus_brief_in_Gasperini.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>2. Copy of 1994 <em>amicus<\/em> brief by Professor McEvoy, et al., in <em>Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg<\/em>, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), <a title=\"McEvoy amicus brief in Oberg\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1994_historians_brief_in_Oberg.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>3.Copy of 1994 <em>amicus<\/em> brief by Dean Erwin Griswold, et al., in <em>Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg<\/em>, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), <a title=\"Griswold brief\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1994_Dean_Griswold_brief_in_Oberg.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>4. Copy of transcript of oral argument in <em>Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg<\/em>, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), held Apr. 20, 1994, <a title=\"Oberg oral argument\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1994-04-20_Honda_v_Oberg_oral_argument.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1830 article cited in brief<\/strong>: Theron Metcalf, <em>A Reading on Damages in Actions Ex Delicto<\/em>, 3 Am. Jurist &amp; Law Mag. 287 (1830), <a title=\"Metcalf\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1830_Theron_Metcalf_article.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Three editions of Theodore Sedgwick&#8217;s treatise on damages cited in brief<\/strong>, <em>A Treatise on the Measure of Damages:<\/em><\/p>\n<p>1st edition, 1847, Chapters 1, 18, 24, <a title=\"Sedgwick 1st ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Sedgwick_1st_ed_1847_Chaps_1_18_24.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>2nd edition, 1852, Chapters 1, 18, 26, <a title=\"Sedgwick 2nd ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Sedgwick_2d_ed_1852_Chaps_1_18_26.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>3rd edition, 1858 (last edition before his death), complete treatise, <a title=\"Sedgwick 3rd ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Sedgwick_3d_ed_1858_complete.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Simon Greenleaf&#8217;s discussion of damages in all 16 editions of his evidence treatise<\/strong>, <em>A Treatise on the Law of Evidence<\/em> (material appears in Vol. 2, sections 253 to 278, of each edition) (only some of the editions are cited in the brief):<\/p>\n<p>1st edition, 1846, <a title=\"Greenleaf 1st ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_1st_ed_1846_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n2nd edition, 1848, <a title=\"Greenelaf 2nd ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_2nd_ed_1848_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n3rd edition, 1850, <a title=\"Greenleaf 3rd ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_3rd_ed_1850_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n4th edition, 1852, <a title=\"Greenleaf 4th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_4th_ed_1852_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n5th edition, 1854, <a title=\"Greenleaf 5th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_5th_ed_1854_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n6th edition, 1856, <a title=\"Greenleaf 6th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_6th_ed_1856_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n7th edition, 1858, <a title=\"Greenleaf 7th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_7th_ed_1858_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n8th edition, 1859, <a title=\"Greenleaf 8th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_8th_ed_1859_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n9th edition, 1863, <a title=\"Greenleaf 9th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_9th_ed_1863_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n10th edition, 1868, <a title=\"Greenleaf 10th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_10th_ed_1868_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>(No update of this material for 11th or 12th editions; only Vol. 1 was updated)<\/p>\n<p>13th edition, 1876, <a title=\"Greenleaf 13th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_13th_ed_1876_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n14th edition, 1883, <a title=\"Greenleaf 14th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_14th_ed_1883_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n15th edition, 1892, <a title=\"Greenleaf 15th ed.\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_15th_ed_1892_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n16th edition, 1899, <a title=\"Greenleaf 16th ed\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/Greenleaf_16th_ed_1899_sects_253-278.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>18th-century English cases cited in brief:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. <em>Beardmore v. Carrington<\/em>, 95 Eng. Rep. 790 (K.B. 1764), <a title=\"Beardmore\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1764_Beardmore_v_Carrington.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n2. <em>Benson v. Frederick<\/em>, 97 Eng. Rep. 1130 (K.B. 1766), <a title=\"Benson\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1766_Benson_v_Frederick.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n3. <em>Bruce v. Rawlins<\/em>, 95 Eng. Rep. 934 (C.P. 1770), <a title=\"Bruce\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1770_Bruce_v_Rawlins.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n4. <em>Grey v. Grant<\/em>, 95 Eng. Rep. 794 (C.P. 1764), <a title=\"Grey\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1764_Grey_v_Grant.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n5. <em>Huckle v. Money<\/em>, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (C.P. 1763), <a title=\"Huckle\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1763_Huckle_v_Money.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n6. <em>Sharpe v. Brice<\/em>, 96 Eng. Rep. 557 (C.P. 1774), <a title=\"Sharpe\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1774_Sharpe_v_Brice.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n7. <em>Tullidge v. Wade<\/em>, 95 Eng. Rep. 909 (C.P. 1769), <a title=\"Tullidge\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1769_Tullidge_v_Wade.pdf\">here<\/a>.<br \/>\n8. <em>Wilkes v. Wood<\/em>, 98 Eng. Rep. 489 (C.P. 1763), <a title=\"Wilkes\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/onfile\/files\/2006\/09\/1763_Wilkes_v_Wood.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Site Meter --> <a href=\"http:\/\/s27.sitemeter.com\/stats.asp?site=s27onfile\" target=\"_top\"> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/s27.sitemeter.com\/meter.asp?site=s27onfile\" alt=\"Site Meter\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a> <!-- Copyright (c)2006 Site Meter --><\/p>\n<p><!-- Start of StatCounter Code --> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.statcounter.com\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/c18.statcounter.com\/counter.php?sc_project=1890513&amp;java=0&amp;security=bd928b87&amp;invisible=0\" alt=\"hit counter code\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a> <!-- End of StatCounter Code --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brief of Akhil Reed Amar and Arthur McEvoy as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, filed on Sept. 15, 2006, in Philip Morris USA v. Williams, No. 05-1256 (U.S. Supreme Court) (a case raising constitutional issues pertaining to the common-law &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/williams\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":456,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P4Jj4g-3","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/456"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":120,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3\/revisions\/120"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/onfile\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}