{"id":317,"date":"2010-04-07T16:27:50","date_gmt":"2010-04-07T20:27:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/?p=317"},"modified":"2011-07-29T22:52:09","modified_gmt":"2011-07-30T02:52:09","slug":"network-neutrality-is-the-new-common-carriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/archives\/317","title":{"rendered":"Network Neutrality is the New Common Carriage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(Or: <strong>I&#8217;m feeling prescient today<\/strong>.)<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday&#8217;s DC circuit court decision ruled that the US FCC has no authority to impose network neutrality rules. \u00a0Comcast, you&#8217;ll remember, was doing <a href=\"http:\/\/torrentfreak.com\/comcast-throttles-bittorrent-traffic-seeding-impossible\/\">some hinky stuff<\/a> where they looked at what you were doing online&#8230; then if they didn&#8217;t like something that you wanted to send or receive over the Internet, they wouldn&#8217;t deliver those bits. \u00a0(They were preventing BitTorrent clients from seeding by sending false reset [RST] messages.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bittorrent.com\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-318\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/files\/2010\/04\/bittorrent-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/files\/2010\/04\/bittorrent-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/files\/2010\/04\/bittorrent.png 256w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bittorrent.com\/\"><\/a><em>[It has a &#8220;C&#8221; in it, but this is the logo Comcast doesn&#8217;t like.]<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This kind of pernicious discrimination in the delivery of Internet content has led to abuses like Canadian ISP Telus&#8217;s decision to <a href=\"http:\/\/boingboing.net\/2005\/07\/24\/phone-company-blocks.html\">block its users from looking the web site of its worker&#8217;s union during a labor dispute<\/a>. \u00a0It is crucial that the owners of our communication systems not get to decide what we can and can&#8217;t communicate about.<\/p>\n<p>Some version of network neutrality rules are a good idea, so you would think I&#8217;d be saddened by the court&#8217;s decision preventing the FCC from adopting them. \u00a0(The hyperbolically charming Huffington Post headline about this was &#8220;<strong>The Day the Internet Lost<\/strong>.&#8221;) \u00a0But I&#8217;m not sad. \u00a0Because it looks like this minor setback for network neutrality may turn out to be a big victory.<\/p>\n<p>The court&#8217;s ruling &#8212; on pretty arcane grounds &#8212; says that the FCC doesn&#8217;t have authority to make up network neutrality rules under the act granting it authority to regulate &#8220;information services.&#8221; \u00a0But <strong>there are other ways to handle Network Neutrality<\/strong>. \u00a0A chorus of voices (see this excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/telecom\/news\/2010\/04\/comcast-1-fcc-0-what-to-look-for-in-the-inevitable-rematch.ars\">Ars Technica analysis<\/a>) is now suggesting that the FCC should classify broadband Internet as a <strong>common carrier<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In the network neutrality <a href=\"http:\/\/hraunfoss.fcc.gov\/edocs_public\/attachmatch\/FCC-09-93A1.pdf\">Notice of Proposed Rulemaking<\/a>, the FCC noted that the network neutrality rules it was trying to set up look a lot like the nondiscrimination rules that already exist for common carriers in Title II of the Communications Act. \u00a0The act already says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>47 USC 202 (a) It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make <strong>unjust or unreasonable discrimination<\/strong> in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services&#8230; (c) Any carrier who knowingly violates the provisions of this section shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $6000 for each offense and $300 for each and every day of the continuance of the offense.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So information services can discriminate, but common carriers can&#8217;t. \u00a0Now the FCC will consider whether to classify broadband as a common carrier. \u00a0Sounds good to me. \u00a0In a journal article I wrote in 2007 I argued that <strong>these two debates<\/strong> (network neutrality \/ common carriage) <strong>are essentially the same<\/strong> debate. \u00a0It&#8217;s all in my title: \u00a0&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.communication.illinois.edu\/csandvig\/research\/Sandvig--Network_neutrality_is_the_new_common_carriage.pdf\">Network Neutrality is the New Common Carriage<\/a>.&#8221; \u00a0So I&#8217;m feeling prescient today.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>(N.B. The network neutrality debate has moved on since I wrote this article. \u00a0In this article I argue against &#8220;one rule&#8221; &#8212; a reference to Tim Wu&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.communication.illinois.edu\/csandvig\/research\/Sandvig--Network_neutrality_is_the_new_common_carriage.pdf\">flat model of network neutrality regulations<\/a>. \u00a0In fact I&#8217;m in favor of network neutrality I just don&#8217;t think Wu&#8217;s particular flat model will work well. \u00a0Indeed I characterize, as Wu does, the whole history of telecommunications as being effectively <strong>all about non-discrimination<\/strong> rules.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Or: I&#8217;m feeling prescient today.) Yesterday&#8217;s DC circuit court decision ruled that the US FCC has no authority to impose network neutrality rules. \u00a0Comcast, you&#8217;ll remember, was doing some hinky stuff where they looked at what you were doing online&#8230; then if they didn&#8217;t like something that you wanted to send or receive over the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2132,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1321],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4M7Bm-57","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2132"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":593,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317\/revisions\/593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/niftyc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}