{"id":1409,"date":"2010-11-05T07:10:32","date_gmt":"2010-11-05T12:10:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nesson\/?p=1409"},"modified":"2010-11-05T09:51:18","modified_gmt":"2010-11-05T14:51:18","slug":"good-piece-in-the-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/2010\/11\/05\/good-piece-in-the-register\/","title":{"rendered":"Good Piece in the Register"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2010\/11\/04\/jammie_thomas_third_time_unlucky\/\"><\/p>\n<h3>World&#8217;s dumbest file-sharer guilty for third time<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Everyone loses<\/h3>\n<p>By Andrew Orlowski <\/p>\n<p>Orlowski observes:<\/p>\n<p><big><strong><em>Copyright and the statutory damages framework are unchanged &#8211; as they were after the Tenenbaum verdict, in which Nesson had vowed to &#8220;put the record industry on trial.&#8221; Thomas-Rasset maintains her innocence in defiance of all reason &#8211; part of the reason for the original guilty verdict three years ago was that her peers felt she was insulting their intelligence, and wasting public money by bringing such a weak case to court. The plaintiffs will never see the damages, and don&#8217;t want it anyway. The defendant&#8217;s lawyers have been working <em>pro bono<\/em>, so there&#8217;s an opportunity cost for them, too.<\/strong><\/big><\/em><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/mediaberkman\/2010\/10\/27\/radio-berkman-166-an-innocent-infringer\/\"><br \/>\nwhy are we in it<\/p>\n<p>what are we fighting for<\/a><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>an addition to the Register piece &#8211; subsequent to the initial rejection of my amicus offering, Judge Davis accepted my <a href=\"http:\/\/beckermanlegal.com\/pdf\/?file=\/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law\/virgin_thomas_101101AmicusBrief.pdf\">amicus<\/a> brief, asked the riaa to <a href=\"http:\/\/beckermanlegal.com\/pdf\/?file=\/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law\/virgin_thomas_101102OpposingBrief.pdf\">respond<\/a>, to which, when they did, i <a href=\"http:\/\/beckermanlegal.com\/pdf\/?file=\/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law\/virgin_thomas_101103AmicusReplyBrief.pdf\">replied<\/a>. The issues are now finally coming clear. Four trials now demonstrate that the court&#8217;s misapplication of the copyright law predictably leads to wildly excessive unconstitutional verdicts. Something is obviously wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Orlowski concludes, <big><strong> <em>&#8220;Nobody has become richer, or wiser. And Thomas-Rasset insists it must drag on. \u00ae &#8220;<\/em><\/big><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>One can see that  Orlowski does not play poker. as bob seger sings in <em>face the promise<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1Jm1lkBo4Zk&amp;feature=related\">you won&#8217;t stop there<\/a>. game still on.<\/p>\n<p>:&lt;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>World&#8217;s dumbest file-sharer guilty for third time Everyone loses By Andrew Orlowski Orlowski observes: Copyright and the statutory damages framework are unchanged &#8211; as they were after the Tenenbaum verdict, in which Nesson had vowed to &#8220;put the record industry on trial.&#8221; Thomas-Rasset maintains her innocence in defiance of all reason &#8211; part of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":370,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[853,2176,387,30406],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lessig","category-poker","category-riaa","category-tenenbaum","p1","y2010","m11","d05","h02"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/370"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1409"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1422,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1409\/revisions\/1422"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}