{"id":1382,"date":"2010-11-03T21:34:31","date_gmt":"2010-11-04T02:34:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nesson\/?p=1382"},"modified":"2010-11-04T15:51:24","modified_gmt":"2010-11-04T20:51:24","slug":"another-draconian-verdict-riaa-v-jammie-thomas-rasset","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/2010\/11\/03\/another-draconian-verdict-riaa-v-jammie-thomas-rasset\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Draconian JURY Verdict &#8212; Groundhog Day &#8212;  RIAA v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><big>What follows are the judge&#8217;s instructions to the jury. Read them and you will begin to understand why juries return the draconian awards the riaa is able consistently to achieve.<\/big><\/em> <\/p>\n<p>This is an action for copyright infringement.  A \u201ccopyright\u201d is the exclusive  right to copy.  A copyrighted work can be a literary work, musical work,  dramatic work, pantomime, choreographic work, pictorial work, graphic work,  sculptural work, motion picture, audiovisual work, sound recording,  architectural work, mask works fixed in semiconductor chip products, or a  computer program.  <\/p>\n<p>The owner of a copyright generally has the right to exclude any other  person from reproducing, preparing derivative works, distributing, performing,  displaying, or using the work covered by copyright for a specific period of time.   One who reproduces or distributes a copyrighted work during the term of the  copyright, infringes the copyright, unless licensed by the copyright owner.  In this case, a jury in an earlier trial determined that the plaintiffs are  copyright owners or licensees of exclusive rights under United States copyright  with respect to certain copyrighted sound recordings, which are listed on Trial  Exhibit 1 and Trial Exhibit 2, and that the defendant, Jammie Thomas\u2010Rasset,  infringed plaintiffs\u2019 copyrights in these works by using an online media  distribution system known as KaZaA to download the plaintiffs\u2019 copyrighted  recordings and to distribute the copyrighted recordings without the plaintiffs\u2019  authorization or a license.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWillful\u201d means that a defendant had knowledge that her actions  constituted copyright infringement or acted with reckless disregard of the  copyright holder\u2019s rights.  You are hereby instructed that a jury in a previous trial has already determined that the defendant\u2019s infringement of plaintiffs\u2019 copyrights was  willful.  In this case, there is no issue as to the defendant\u2019s liability for willful  copyright infringement. As a result, your sole responsibility is to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiffs for the defendant\u2019s willful infringement of the  plaintiffs\u2019 copyrights.  <\/p>\n<p>In this case, each plaintiff has elected to recover \u201cstatutory damages\u201d  instead of actual damages and profits.  A copyright holder may recover statutory  damages even if it did not submit evidence regarding actual damages.  <strong><em>Under the Copyright Act, each plaintiff is entitled to a sum of not less than  $750 or more than $30,000 per act of infringement (that is, per sound recording  downloaded or distributed without license).  Because the defendant\u2019s conduct  was willful, then each plaintiff is entitled to a sum of up to $150,000 per act of  infringement (that is, per sound recording downloaded or distributed without  license), as you consider just. <\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>In determining the just amount of statutory damages for an infringing defendant, you may consider the willfulness of the defendant\u2019s conduct, the defendant\u2019s innocence, the defendant\u2019s continuation of infringement after notice or knowledge of the copyright or in reckless disregard of the copyright, the effect of the defendant\u2019s prior or concurrent copyright infringement activity, whether profit or gain was established, harm to the plaintiff, the value of the copyright, <strong><em>the need to deter<\/strong><\/em> this defendant and <strong><em>other potential infringers<\/em><\/strong>, and any mitigating circumstances.    <\/p>\n<p><em><big>The jury did just what it was told. There was no fair trial. If this is the jury trial the Seventh Amendment guaranteed then the Constitution needs to be rewritten.<\/big><\/em> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nesson\/files\/2010\/11\/verdict-form.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nesson\/files\/2010\/11\/verdict-form-293x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"293\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/files\/2010\/11\/verdict-form-293x300.jpg 293w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/files\/2010\/11\/verdict-form.jpg 527w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 293px) 100vw, 293px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><big>24 times<\/big><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What follows are the judge&#8217;s instructions to the jury. Read them and you will begin to understand why juries return the draconian awards the riaa is able consistently to achieve. This is an action for copyright infringement. A \u201ccopyright\u201d is the exclusive right to copy. A copyrighted work can be a literary work, musical work, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":370,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[387,30406],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-riaa","category-tenenbaum","p1","y2010","m11","d03","h16"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/370"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1382"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1408,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1382\/revisions\/1408"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/nesson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}