{"id":1572,"date":"2004-10-20T11:25:23","date_gmt":"2004-10-20T15:25:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nateptest\/2004\/10\/20\/bushs-christianity-redux\/"},"modified":"2004-10-20T11:25:23","modified_gmt":"2004-10-20T15:25:23","slug":"bushs-christianity-redux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/2004\/10\/20\/bushs-christianity-redux\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush&#8217;s Christianity, redux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a611'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/web\/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;articleId=8790\">This piece, by Ayelish McGarvey<\/a>, perfectly explains why Bush&#8217;s faith proves so frustrating.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><font>This is a huge mistake, because when judged by<br \/>\nhis deeds, an entirely different picture emerges: Bush does not<br \/>\ndemonstrate a life of faith by his actions, and neither Methodists,<br \/>\nevangelicals, nor fundamentalists can rightly call him brother. In<br \/>\nfact, the available evidence raises serious questions about whether<br \/>\nBush is really a Christian at all. <\/font><\/p>\n<p><font>Ironically for a man who once<br \/>\nfamously named Jesus as his favorite political philosopher during a<br \/>\ncampaign debate, it is remarkably difficult to pinpoint a single<br \/>\ninstance wherein Christian teaching has won out over partisan politics<br \/>\nin the Bush White House. Though Bush easily weaves Christian language<br \/>\nand themes into his political communication, empty religious jargon is<br \/>\nno substitute for a bedrock faith. Even little children in Sunday<br \/>\nschool know that Jesus taught his disciples to live according to his<br \/>\ncommandments, not simply to talk about them a lot. In Bush&#x2019;s case,<br \/>\nfaith without works is not just dead faith &#8212; it&#x2019;s evangelical agitprop&#8230;.<br \/>\n<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font>Judging him on his record, George W. Bush&#x2019;s<br \/>\nspiritual transformation seems to have consisted of little more than<br \/>\nstaying on the wagon, with Jesus as a sort of talismanic Alcoholics<br \/>\nAnonymous counselor. Bush came to his faith through a small group<br \/>\nprogram created by Community Bible Study, which de-emphasizes sin and<br \/>\nresembles a sort of Jesus-centered therapy session. <\/font><font><br \/>\n  <\/font><\/p>\n<p><font>But sin is crucial to Christianity.<br \/>\nTo be born again, a seeker must painfully acknowledge his or her innate<br \/>\nsinfulness, and then turn away from it completely&#8230;.<br \/>\n<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>From what I know, McGarvey professes an<br \/>\nevangelical Christian faith, so he&#8217;s quite adequately positioned to<br \/>\nmake a criticism of the president on thiese grounds.&nbsp; Furthermore,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><font>Just who will boldly hold the president<br \/>\naccountable to Scripture? Sycophantic religious conservatives are<br \/>\nheavily invested in politics; they dare not rock the boat. Religious<br \/>\nliberals are cast aside as partisan. And as Amy Sullivan noted recently<br \/>\nin <i>The New Republic<\/i>, Bush does not regularly attend church &#8212;<br \/>\nhe doesn&#x2019;t even have a pastor or fellow congregants to keep him on the<br \/>\nstraight and narrow. <\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;e wondered about this for years.&nbsp; Bill Clinton, the anti-moral<br \/>\nexemplar of the Republican Party, at least went to church pretty<br \/>\nregularly, if not every week, then three of four weeks.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve heard the argument from a variety of people, including some of the<br \/>\nmembers of the Red Sox watching party I&#8217;m at, have noted that it&#8217;s hard<br \/>\nfor the President to go to church every Sunday, with all the security<br \/>\nrequirements and such.&nbsp; But one could certainly have a pastor in<br \/>\non a regular basis.&nbsp; And with the Bush family&#8217;s vaunted ties to<br \/>\nBilly Graham, it shouldn&#8217;t be hard to have your pick.<\/p>\n<p>On a more serious note, however, it&#8217;s a fairly serious thing that Bush<br \/>\nmakes so much of his faith but does not attend a regular service.&nbsp;<br \/>\nOne of the key commitments of Christianity is that the believer does<br \/>\nnot individually engage with God and the world; the community is a key<br \/>\naspect of the Christian experience.&nbsp; Even Protestant individualism<br \/>\nstill acknowledges the key role for the corporate body of believers;<br \/>\nwithout the Church, &#8220;one, holy, catholic, and apostolic&#8221; (a line of the<br \/>\ncreed that even evangelicals sunscibe to, if not in the same fashion as<br \/>\nthe Orthodox, Roman Catholics, and Anglicans), without the corporate<br \/>\nengagement with God, the believer cannot grow to his or her fullest<br \/>\nmeasure in the faith.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve heard quite a bit of late on Bush not being able to admit his<br \/>\nmistakes, about him not taking advice outside the small coterie of is<br \/>\n&#8220;war council&#8221;, about his stubbornness.&nbsp; And what we know about<br \/>\nGeorge Bush&#8217;s religious conviction, as evidenced by his unwillingness<br \/>\nto engage with his fellow believers (sic)* in the hard process of<br \/>\nrelating to God, demonstrates this further.&nbsp; Bush does not think<br \/>\nhe has any need to engage with other believers because I don&#8217;t think he<br \/>\nunderstands that God is greater than the flexible leanings of his own<br \/>\nconscience.&nbsp; He doesn&#8217;t understand that &#8220;conscience&#8221; can be wrong<br \/>\nand that the corporate body exists to ensure that conscience does not<br \/>\ngo off too far in the wrong direction.<\/p>\n<p>Which I guess shouldn&#8217;t be surprising.&nbsp; From what we know about<br \/>\nBush&#8217;s politics, it&#8217;s not surprising to see that the purportedly deeper<br \/>\nbeliefs of his life betray an amazing hubris &#8212; the very opposite of<br \/>\nwhat all faiths teach that true faith consists of.&nbsp; Humility, not<br \/>\nhubris, lies at the core of Christianity, which indicates that George<br \/>\nW. Bush lies quite far from the heart, soul, and core of the faith he<br \/>\nso vociferously claims.<\/p>\n<p>* A common trope in my evangelical youth was to tell people about their<br \/>\nfaith, &#8220;You are sincere in what you believe, but you&#8217;re sincerely<br \/>\nwrong.&#8221;&nbsp; I think GWB is sincere about what he thinks he believes,<br \/>\nbut I wonder if it&#8217;s orthodox Christian faith.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This piece, by Ayelish McGarvey, perfectly explains why Bush&#8217;s faith proves so frustrating. This is a huge mistake, because when judged by his deeds, an entirely different picture emerges: Bush does not demonstrate a life of faith by his actions, and neither Methodists, evangelicals, nor fundamentalists can rightly call him brother. In fact, the available [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":709,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rayleejun"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5G3PH-pm","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/709"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1572\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}