{"id":1482,"date":"2004-07-28T20:37:22","date_gmt":"2004-07-29T00:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nateptest\/2004\/07\/28\/religion-and-the-democrats\/"},"modified":"2004-07-28T20:37:22","modified_gmt":"2004-07-29T00:37:22","slug":"religion-and-the-democrats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/2004\/07\/28\/religion-and-the-democrats\/","title":{"rendered":"Religion and the Democrats"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a435'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So I spent a decent amount of today at the &#8220;People of Faith&#8221; caucus<br \/>\nluncheon, talking with a number of delegates and party people about how<br \/>\nthe Democrats are attempting to make a renewed connection with faith<br \/>\ncommunities.<\/p>\n<p>The speakers outlined in a variety of ways how the Democratic party<br \/>\ncould try to make a connection with &#8220;communities of faith.&#8221;&nbsp; (N.B.<br \/>\n&#8220;Community&#8221; has got to be the most overused word in modern civic<br \/>\nculture discourse.&nbsp; It&#8217;s so overused as to have lost<br \/>\nmeaning.)&nbsp; Although the caucus luncheon was meant to include<br \/>\npeople of all the monotheistic faiths (well, at least Jews and Muslims<br \/>\nwere the only ones mentioned besides the obvious), the focus was<br \/>\noverwhelmingly upon the Christian side of the problem.&nbsp; At least<br \/>\nin our contemporary political discourse, the significant divide over<br \/>\nreligion occurs with the Christians.&nbsp; There&#8217;s the right and<br \/>\nthere&#8217;s the rest of us.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sojo.net\/index.cfm?action=about_us.display_staff&amp;staff=wallis\"><br \/>\nJim Wallis<\/a>, the editor of Sojourners magazine, noted in his speech, &#8220;We<br \/>\nneed to take back the idea that faith and God are a province of the<br \/>\nreligious right.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He continued, &#8220;The media is filled with stories of the divided<br \/>\nchurch.&nbsp; Others say that religion doesn&#8217;t have a place in<br \/>\npolitics.&nbsp; We think that it does.&nbsp; Some of us feel that our<br \/>\nvoice of faith has been stolen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sojourners.com\">Sojourners <\/a>is a magazine and an<br \/>\norganization dedicated &#8220;to proclaim and practice the<br \/>\nbiblical call to integrate spiritual renewal and social justice.&#8221;&nbsp;<br \/>\nWallis focused a lot on his comments on the poor in this country and<br \/>\nabroad, and that seems to be at the heart of much of what he&#8217;s worked<br \/>\non in his life.&nbsp; He also encouraged the people present to remember<br \/>\nthat the care of the environment, prejudice and discrimination, and war<br \/>\nare all issues that faith can inform, and not just in the way portrayed<br \/>\nby the right.&nbsp; &#8220;My evangelical tradition has been distorted such<br \/>\nthat it<br \/>\nseems the faith of Jesus has become pro-rich, pro-war,<br \/>\npro-American.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He finished, &#8220;&#8216;We are the ones we have been waiting for.'&#8221;&nbsp; The<br \/>\ncountry is terrified by fear; we need the healing of the nation that is<br \/>\ndeeper than politics.&nbsp; The most frequent words of Jesus are &#8216;Be<br \/>\nnot afraid.&#8217;&nbsp; if your political commitments are rooted in your<br \/>\nmoral values, in your faith, you need to let your values, your faith<br \/>\nshine through.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>More later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So I spent a decent amount of today at the &#8220;People of Faith&#8221; caucus luncheon, talking with a number of delegates and party people about how the Democrats are attempting to make a renewed connection with faith communities. The speakers outlined in a variety of ways how the Democratic party could try to make a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":709,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[661],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-deeencee"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5G3PH-nU","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/709"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1482\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}