{"id":1412,"date":"2004-03-24T10:07:26","date_gmt":"2004-03-24T14:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nateptest\/2004\/03\/24\/faulty-leap-in-ryans-logic\/"},"modified":"2004-03-24T10:07:26","modified_gmt":"2004-03-24T14:07:26","slug":"faulty-leap-in-ryans-logic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/2004\/03\/24\/faulty-leap-in-ryans-logic\/","title":{"rendered":"Faulty leap in Ryan&#8217;s logic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a305'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sanskritboy.net\/archives\/2004\/03\/24\/i_am_an_antireligion_pig.html\">Ryan contends the following<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[F]or people without a deracinated, ecumenical God, religion actually <em>means something<\/em>, and scriptures should be taken literally.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let us play opposites here.&nbsp; For people who don&#8217;t have a<br \/>\nhyper-particularized God, can their religion actually mean<br \/>\nsomething?&nbsp; And if religion actually means something, must its<br \/>\nscriptures be taken literally?<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think either of his contentions bear up.&nbsp; By &#8220;mean<br \/>\nsomething&#8221;, Ryan has generally opined that for a religion to mean<br \/>\nsomething, it must spur its adherents to extreme acts, but acts of a<br \/>\nparticularly negative character.&nbsp; Ryan often talks about &#8220;strong<br \/>\nreligion,&#8221; but the ways in which it spurs its followers to act, in his<br \/>\ncitations, are generally destructive acts.&nbsp; My two beginnings of a<br \/>\ncounter-example are the following questions.<\/p>\n<p>First, can religion that &#8220;means something&#8221; &#8212; so-called &#8220;strong&#8221;<br \/>\nreligion &#8212; spur its adherents to acts, not of superhuman brutality,<br \/>\nbut acts of superhuman charity and love?&nbsp; (Yes, I opine.&nbsp; And<br \/>\nI can cite a couple of examples.)<\/p>\n<p>Second, why must an act require extreme (in time or in impact) action<br \/>\nto &#8220;mean something&#8221;?&nbsp; In other words, can there be meaning in<br \/>\nactions and attitudes that are not extreme?&nbsp; Why or why not?<\/p>\n<p>As for Ryan&#8217;s project of poking fun at people&#8217;s seriousness about God<br \/>\nand their images of Him\/Her, I&#8217;m all for it.&nbsp; If people are threatened<br \/>\nby it, they&#8217;re probably done exactly as Mark Twain said we do with<br \/>\nGod.&nbsp; &#8220;God created man in His own image, and man, being a<br \/>\ngentleman, returned the favor.&#8221;&nbsp; We&#8217;ve gotta kill our Buddha, as<br \/>\nit were, and humor provides one of the best ways to do that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ryan contends the following: [F]or people without a deracinated, ecumenical God, religion actually means something, and scriptures should be taken literally. Let us play opposites here.&nbsp; For people who don&#8217;t have a hyper-particularized God, can their religion actually mean something?&nbsp; And if religion actually means something, must its scriptures be taken literally? I don&#8217;t think [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":709,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rayleejun"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5G3PH-mM","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/709"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1412\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}