{"id":1176,"date":"2005-04-22T10:52:11","date_gmt":"2005-04-22T14:52:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/nateptest\/2005\/04\/22\/somehow-i-doubt-it\/"},"modified":"2005-04-22T10:52:11","modified_gmt":"2005-04-22T14:52:11","slug":"somehow-i-doubt-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/2005\/04\/22\/somehow-i-doubt-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Somehow I doubt it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a1000'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/04\/22\/national\/22gay.html?partner=rssnyt\">That Microsoft is afraid, I mean<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe Microsoft Corporation, at the forefront of corporate gay rights for<br \/>\ndecades, is coming under fire from gay rights groups, politicians and<br \/>\nits own employees for withdrawing its support for a state bill that<br \/>\nwould have barred discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>State Representative Ed Murray, an openly gay Democrat and a sponsor of<br \/>\nthe bill, said that in a conversation last month with Bradford L.<br \/>\nSmith, Microsoft&#8217;s senior vice president and general counsel, Mr. Smith<br \/>\nmade it clear to him that the company was under pressure from the<br \/>\nchurch and the pastor and that he was also concerned about the reaction<br \/>\nto company support of the bill among its Christian employees, the<br \/>\nlawmaker said.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Smith would not comment for this article.<\/p>\n<p>Representative<br \/>\nMurray said that in a recent conversation with Mr. Smith, Mr. Smith<br \/>\nsaid that the minister had demanded the company fire Microsoft<br \/>\nemployees who testified this year on behalf of the bill, but that Mr.<br \/>\nSmith had refused. According to Representative Murray, Mr. Smith said<br \/>\n&#8220;that while he did not do the many things that the minister had<br \/>\nrequested, including firing employees who had testified for the bill,<br \/>\nhe believed that Microsoft could not just respond to one group of<br \/>\nemployees, when there were other groups of employees who felt much<br \/>\ndifferent.\n  <\/p>\n<p>Dr. Hutcherson, who has become a leading national critic of same-sex<br \/>\nmarriage, said he believed he could have organized a widespread boycott<br \/>\nof Microsoft. He said he told the Microsoft executives, &#8220;If you don&#8217;t<br \/>\nthink the moral issue is not a big issue, just count the amount of<br \/>\nvotes that were cast on moral issues in the last election.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A lot of Christians would have joined me,&#8221; he said, &#8220;But it would have been a lot more people, too.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Um, no.<\/p>\n<p>First off, this Christianist is a bully.&nbsp; Like all bullies, he<br \/>\nhas an overinflated sense of his own power, and he&#8217;s going around<br \/>\nmaking demands and issuing threats.&nbsp; Let us repeat: only one in<br \/>\nfive voters said that &#8220;moral issues&#8221; were important in the last<br \/>\nelection.&nbsp; Eighty percent said they were not.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/wp-dyn\/A34783-2004Dec4?language=printer\">And the poll that everyone&#8217;s making claims upon was significantly flawed, and so its results should not be trusted<\/a>.&nbsp;<br \/>\nSo he also asked for those who testified in favor of the bill to be<br \/>\nfired.&nbsp; Granted, that would capture a lot of the LGBT employees,<br \/>\nbut it&#8217;s a request <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">to fire someone from their job because of the opinions that they hold and the thoughts that they think<\/span>.&nbsp; Such seems the essence of theocracy and of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/tg\/detail\/-\/0156701537\/qid=1114178409\/sr=8-1\/ref=pd_csp_1\/102-3288314-9202527?v=glance&amp;s=books&amp;n=507846\">totalitarianism<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p>Second, who does he think he&#8217;s threatening?&nbsp; This is MICROSOFT,<br \/>\nthe most powerful company in the world.&nbsp; He probably wrote<br \/>\neverything pertaining to this case on Word in a Windows<br \/>\nenvironment.&nbsp; They have 95 percent of the home market.&nbsp; And<br \/>\nApple tends to be similarly liberal, too, so defection is not an<br \/>\noption.&nbsp; And few people want to deal with Linux, especially with<br \/>\nits anti-hierarchical structure (which probably concerns the<br \/>\nChristianist bully).&nbsp; Even if people threaten Microsoft with<br \/>\naction, when it comes time to buy a computer, or a palm device, or a<br \/>\nhome media center, and so forth, will the resolve really hold up?&nbsp;<br \/>\nIf the choice is consume or not to consume, people in our society<br \/>\ngenerally consume.&nbsp; Sure, some won&#8217;t, but most will.\n<\/p>\n<p>Something else is going on here.&nbsp; Microsoft may have backed away a<br \/>\nbit because of this guy and his supporters, but even a bunch of<br \/>\nchurches spread throughout the country won&#8217;t break Microsoft&#8217;s hold on<br \/>\nyour (and my) desktop.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>That Microsoft is afraid, I mean. The Microsoft Corporation, at the forefront of corporate gay rights for decades, is coming under fire from gay rights groups, politicians and its own employees for withdrawing its support for a state bill that would have barred discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation&#8230;. State Representative Ed Murray, an [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":709,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politicks"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5G3PH-iY","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/709"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/natep\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}