{"id":157,"date":"2008-07-24T16:13:51","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T21:13:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/2008\/07\/24\/telling-the-fcc-what-i-think\/"},"modified":"2008-07-25T15:41:59","modified_gmt":"2008-07-25T20:41:59","slug":"telling-the-fcc-what-i-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/2008\/07\/24\/telling-the-fcc-what-i-think\/","title":{"rendered":"Telling the FCC what I think"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/files\/2008\/07\/freespeechtakeitback.jpg\" align=\"left\" height=\"222\" width=\"143\" \/>Actually, my talented colleagues <a href=\"http:\/\/wendy.seltzer.org\/blog\/archives\/2008\/06\/25\/the-fcc-stumbles-into-internet-filtering.html\">Wendy Seltzer<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/afs.eecs.harvard.edu\/~goodell\/\">Geoff Goodell<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/cms.mit.edu\/people\/gradstudents.php#schultze\">Steve Schultze<\/a> did the very eloquent telling of the FCC that their proposal to give away spectrum to be used for &#8220;family-friendly&#8221; Internet, accomplished by network-level filtering of potentially harmful content, which I wrote about <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/2008\/06\/24\/1st-amendment-never-heard-of-it-says-fcc\/\">a few days ago<\/a>, is wrongheaded on many fronts:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; it mistakenly treats the Internet like a broadcaster, which denies the Internet&#8217;s essential nature as a space for creation, collaboration and innovation;<br \/>\n&#8212; it will stifle both competition and innovation in important areas;<br \/>\n&#8212; it is in conflict with the FCC&#8217;s own policies promoting openness and neutrality; and worst of all,<br \/>\n&#8212; it <strong>violates the First Amendment<\/strong> (oh that!), suppressing large amounts of speech<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the supershort version, if you have time to be really enraged about this (and you should!) you can read the whole comment on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fcc.gov\">FCC<\/a> website, in docket <a href=\"http:\/\/gullfoss2.fcc.gov\/prod\/ecfs\/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&amp;id_document=6520035326\">07-195<\/a>. And sign up for Berkman&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/getinvolved#mailinglists\">mailing lists<\/a>, where news will surely be posted as it appears.<\/p>\n<p>Update: My fellow fellow Harry Lewis has a lovely <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bitsbook.com\/2008\/07\/protesting-a-proposal-for-a-censored-internet\/trackback\/\">post<\/a> on the absurdity of the proposed rule.<\/p>\n<p>Image: Free Speech<br \/>\nUploaded on May 1, 2007<br \/>\nby <a href=\"http:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\/#\">mellowbox<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\" title=\"Click this link to find out details of the Creative Commons license associated with this image.\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/images\/public\/somerights20.gif\" alt=\"There is a Creative Commons license attached to this image.\" height=\"31\" width=\"88\" \/><\/a> <span class=\"ccIcn\"><a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/l.yimg.com\/g\/images\/cc_icon_attribution.gif\" alt=\"Attribution\" border=\"0\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/l.yimg.com\/g\/images\/cc_icon_sharealike.gif\" alt=\"Share Alike\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/FCC\">FCC<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/pornography\">pornography<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/censorship\">censorship<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Actually, my talented colleagues Wendy Seltzer, Geoff Goodell and Steve Schultze did the very eloquent telling of the FCC that their proposal to give away spectrum to be used for &#8220;family-friendly&#8221; Internet, accomplished by network-level filtering of potentially harmful content, which I wrote about a few days ago, is wrongheaded on many fronts: &#8212; it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1659,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2221,96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cappucino","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1659"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/mediarepublic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}