{"id":7,"date":"2005-04-14T19:01:46","date_gmt":"2005-04-14T23:01:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/2005\/04\/14\/will-china-devalue-its-c"},"modified":"2005-04-14T19:01:46","modified_gmt":"2005-04-14T23:01:46","slug":"will-china-devalue-its-currency-april-14-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/2005\/04\/14\/will-china-devalue-its-currency-april-14-2005\/","title":{"rendered":"Will China Devalue Its Currency? April 14, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a22'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\">This morning&#8217;s <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/\">Financial Times<\/A> carries an interesting piece by Andrew Balls and Richard McCregor on China&#8217;s &#8220;dollar dilemma&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp; Should she revalue the renminbi (currently pegged at Rmb8.28 to the US dollar) for the first time in more than a decade?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; American manufacturers and labor unions say yes; the current peg costs companies sales and <A href=\"http:\/\/www.asianlabour.org\/archives\/002707.php\">unions<\/A>, &nbsp;jobs.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; And the US Congress, as impotent as ever in creating either &#8212; at least in America &#8212; has joined the pack.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\">Rumors of an impending turn in China&#8217;s exchange rate policy have been rife since the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.g8.utoronto.ca\/scholar\/kirton199903\/china4.htm\">Asian economic meltdown<\/A> during the late 1990s.&nbsp;&nbsp; Back then, the US current deficit, according to Balls and McCregor, &#8220;could be seen as a reflection of private capital flows, attracted by the [US&#8217;s] strong productivity growth&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp; This time, however, things are different.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\">Now, the deficit (estimated at nearly $700bn, or nearly 6 per cent of GDP) can largely be laid at the door of foreign state banks (mainly from Asia) buying US treasury bonds.&nbsp;&nbsp; China alone holds more than 40% of all foreign exchange reserves held by developing countries.&nbsp;&nbsp; In many ways, it is countries like China, by continually buying the US dollar in its weakened state (down nearly 20% since the Asian crisis of 1998), that have financed Bush&#8217;s war in Iraq and the substantial tax cuts of the past two years.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\">At the same time, the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.bjreview.com.cn\/200436\/World-200436(A).htm\">current trade imbalance<\/A> with China ballooned this week to $328bn &#8212; the largest ever &#8212; and there are rumblings in Congress that the current exchange rate regime is added support for China&#8217;s ruinous exports.&nbsp;&nbsp; This reflects the concern of the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.g7.utoronto.ca\/\">G7<\/A> that currency &#8220;flexibility&#8221; on the part of Asia is a necessary first step in &#8220;rebalancing&#8221; the world economy.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\">All this is part of a larger program program of reigning in the Chinese economic powerhouse.&nbsp;&nbsp; The Bush administration has enlisted Japan, especially, in this undertaking.&nbsp; The <A href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\">Wall Street Journal<\/A> this morning reports that Tokyo has begun allocating to Japanese companies the rights to drill for natural gas in waters claimed by China.&nbsp;&nbsp; This comes at a time of increased tension between the two Asian countries, due largely to Japan&#8217;s calculated insults to both China and the Koreas over the memory of its <A href=\"http:\/\/www.princeton.edu\/~nanking\/\">WWII atrocities<\/A> when it invaded and occupied both countries.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\">But Bush, agree observers, is playing a precarious game; he needs the Chinese as much or more than they&nbsp;need&nbsp;him.&nbsp; He recognizes that, while&nbsp;such grossly assymetrical trade relations cannot&nbsp;continue indefinitely,&nbsp;China has helped finance the growing <A href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/omb\/\">US budget deficit<\/A>.&nbsp;&nbsp; At the same time, this two-edged sword is challenging the US for&nbsp;supremacy in Asia.&nbsp;&nbsp; Bush is steering a middle course;seeking to pressure but not alienate completely the leaders in Beijing.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P>But, will Beijing take heed and revalue?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Not likely.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The impetus for such a move is absent.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<FONT size=\"2\">Chinese growth rates are right on target.&nbsp;&nbsp; Inflation is&nbsp;under control.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; And the huge trade surplus with the US is largely offset by<\/FONT>&nbsp;the substantial deficit&nbsp;China runs with the rest of Asia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Too, most polls suggest&nbsp;that Americans for the most part do not blame China&nbsp;for the decline of US manufacturing&nbsp;or&nbsp;the concomitant&nbsp;loss of well-paying jobs overseas, factors most often cited by Congressional critics of China&#8217;s monetary policy.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>In fact, the&nbsp;decline of American manufacturing has its antecedents&nbsp;in events long before 1978, when China began its Long March to economic supremacy in Asia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning&#8217;s Financial Times carries an interesting piece by Andrew Balls and Richard McCregor on China&#8217;s &#8220;dollar dilemma&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp; Should she revalue the renminbi (currently pegged at Rmb8.28 to the US dollar) for the first time in more than a decade?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; American manufacturers and labor unions say yes; the current peg costs companies sales and unions, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1120,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1428],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-marxisminternationstories"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1120"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/marxisminternational\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}